-
Trump renames AI "super intelligence," rejects international oversight
-
Moldova declares energy, water emergency
-
Trump rejects international regulation of AI
-
French Holocaust denier jailed for eight months
-
How is the EU approaching record fuel prices?
-
Oil prices slide, AI stock buzz fades
-
Sri Lanka's Colombage strikes on debut as England dismissed for 265 in first ODI
-
Trump threatens to 'annihilate' Iran in bombastic UN speech
-
Hurricane Polo strengthens to top category 5 off Mexico
-
Prada's skirts take centre stage as Milan Fashion Week begins
-
11 hurt as teen opens fire outside school in western Turkey
-
Quoin Pharmaceuticals Announces FDA Fast Track Designation for QRX003 for the Treatment of Peeling Skin Syndrome
-
UN chief says 'Big Oil' treats atmosphere as open sewer
-
Brazil's Flavio Bolsonaro turns scandal into poll gains
-
Tunisia says 2026 summer hottest on record
-
Republican senator seeks probe of Trump Jr Russian-funded wedding
-
England's Rashid out of Sri Lanka ODIs with hand injury
-
Memoir by Diana's brother goes on sale after rocking UK monarchy
-
Houthis accuse Saudi Arabia of deadly strikes as thousands flee
-
Newcomers South Korea face holders Italy in Davis Cup finals
-
Stocks climb as oil slides, AI buzz returns
-
Japan's Kojima sounds Marchand warning with Asian Games gold
-
India cricketers win in style as Afghan savours 'special' Games silver
-
England rugby star Pollock signs new Northampton deal
-
La Liga president hits out at Real Madrid refereeing 'conspiracy' claims
-
STARTRADER Expands Its Chinese Equity CFD Range with CXMT and Unitree Robotics
-
MEXC Launches “Real Stocks, Real Friends” with Rewards for Bringing Friends to Wall Street
-
MEXC Expands Opportunity Compass with Stock Trading Handbook to Help Crypto Users Build Investment Knowledge
-
Mbappe continues media push for Ballon d'Or recognition
-
England paceman Wood retires from international cricket
-
Stocks rise on AI buzz, oil prices cool
-
Magnificent Mandhana's 79 helps India to Asian Games cricket gold
-
India narrowly survive huge scare against minnows Japan
-
Marchand 'stressed' about racing Japanese rivals at LA Olympics
-
Missing F-35 fighter parts 'not sensitive', says Australia minister
-
Mobile boat clinics bring healthcare to India's remote islands
-
Cambodia showcases scams crackdown with global conference
-
Former India paceman Zaheer Khan named Chennai coach in IPL
-
Afghan cyclist who disguised herself as man wins Asian Games silver
-
Six-year-old Chinese girl sets world record with Rubik's Cube
-
Typhoon Dujuan leaves four dead in Japan, 45,000 houses without power
-
Swimming prodigy Yu, 13, says 'interviews way harder than racing'
-
G7 leaders condemn Houthi strikes on Saudi Arabia
-
Star coaches make their bows as Nations League returns
-
Google data centre sparks protests in Austria
-
Rams bounce back as Giants reel from Dart injury
-
Shin Ohashi: Junk food-loving teen and Japan's next big swimming hope
-
In Bangladesh, Pakistan's Jinnah photo stirs anger
-
Stocks rise on AI buzz, drop in oil prices
-
Two New Zealand naval ships transit Taiwan Strait
Biden's student debt relief plan challenged at Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a challenge to President Joe Biden's plan to erase nearly $400 billion of student debt, with all eyes on how far the conservative-dominated bench is willing to go to override the Democratic leader.
The court's ruling, expected before June 30, will decide whether millions of Americans will see up to $20,000 of debt disappear, but could also have implications for future presidential actions.
About 200 protesters gathered outside the court, carrying signs backing Biden's policy.
Lamar Brooks, 22, an African American student from Baltimore, said he already had $18,000 of debt and expected the sum to rocket as he hopes to study to become a psychiatrist.
"I could benefit, and also it will help other minorities as well," he told AFP, saying student debt was a "generational financial burden."
Relying on a Covid-related legal justification, Biden announced his student loan forgiveness plan last August, shortly before the crucial midterm elections.
"This relief is critical to over 40 million Americans as they recover from the economic crisis caused by the pandemic," he tweeted early Tuesday.
"We're confident it's legal. And we're fighting for it in court."
Republican-led states were quick to claim he had overreached his authority and an appellate court halted the measure in November.
Under the relief plan, $10,000 would be cut from all loans owed by people earning less than $125,000 per year. For students who went to university with need-based government assistance known as Pell grants, the relief would be $20,000.
In addition to the coalition of Republican states, two students have also filed suit arguing they were unjustly excluded from the program.
During his 2020 campaign, Biden pledged to act to address the massive amounts of debt US students take on to attend higher education -- the White House says nearly 43 million Americans hold $1.6 trillion in federal student loans.
- Wide range of outcomes -
In the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, then-president Donald Trump ordered a halt to all federal student loan repayments, citing a 2003 law permitting such actions during a "national emergency."
That pause has since been repeatedly renewed, and is currently set to expire in mid-2023.
The Biden administration argues the same law allows for blanket debt cancellation in response to a "once-in-a-century pandemic that starkly disrupted the Nation's economy and borrowers' ability to repay their loans."
Conservatives claim Biden has used the pandemic as a broad excuse to sidestep Congress.
That argument could prevail in the Supreme Court, which has already moved to overturn multiple Covid-related policies issued by the Democratic administration, including on vaccine mandates and a moratorium on evictions.
Biden's Justice Department contends that the Republican states have no legal standing to bring the case as they have "suffered no cognizable injury," and that the two students' challenge is overly broad.
For their part, Republicans are hoping that the panel's 6-3 conservative majority will issue a broad ruling to limit presidential authority, saying that on such important issues the US Constitution requires clear authorization from Congress.
The court used this "major questions doctrine" last June to restrict the powers of the Environmental Protection Agency in its fight against global warming.
If the court further strengthens the doctrine, the Biden administration may find itself unable to act on crucial issues at a time when Congress itself is paralyzed by partisan divisions.
J.Oliveira--PC