-
Wall Street stocks rise, greeting optimism over possible US-Iran deal
-
Jay-Z rape accuser says she made 'false accusations'
-
NFL players chief raises concerns over pitch for Maracana game
-
Senegal draw first match under Vieira and Nigeria survive scare
-
Daytime Russian attacks kill seven in Kyiv
-
Trump, Xi end summit long on pomp, but short on progress
-
Spotting AI writing: how reliable are the detectors?
-
Russia not preparing for conflict with Europe, Putin says
-
French youth await pope after AI 'paradise of machines' warning
-
Trump's photo of Xi greeting carries signs of AI
-
Man City found guilty of Premier League charges, set to appeal: reports
-
Six missing after building blast in historic Athens district
-
Embolo follows Xhaka out of Swiss squad over fake Covid documents
-
Millions in US northeast brace for powerful storm
-
Trump, Xi inspect founding documents of US democracy to close summit
-
Assefa seeks 'better than my best' at Berlin marathon
-
'Bottle Claus': Kipchoge's 'hero' helping runners chase Berlin marathon glory
-
US court refuses to overturn Pentagon ban on Anthropic
-
Olympic medallist Samba-Mayela handed provisional doping ban
-
Verstappen and Norris blame slow cars as Mercedes tops qualifying
-
First US trial against TikTok to open Monday
-
Crowds cheer pope in Paris after AI 'paradise of machines' warning
-
Palmer misses 'too many' England games, says Tuchel
-
Teen swimmer makes Games history as Thai, Chinese sprinters win gold
-
UN refugees chief warns conditions in W.Sahara 'deteriorating'
-
Man City found guilty of 114 Premier League charges - reports
-
Antonelli 'mad' about crash in Azerbaijan qualifying
-
Concerns over 'missing' UK explorer Ranulph Fiennes
-
'Perfect lap' gives Russell pole for Azerbaijan GP as Antonelli crashes out
-
Suspected Paris killer of Argentine rugby star begs forgiveness
-
UN Security Council condemns Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia
-
Oil prices fall on cautious hopes for US-Iran progress
-
China swimmer makes Asian Games history as Thai wins 100m sprint
-
Noskova, Muchova take Czech Republic into BJK Cup final
-
Top French literary prize drops best-selling novel over AI claims
-
Thai sprinter Puripol breaks own Asian Games record to win 100m gold
-
US 'must choose' whether to end war: Iran president
-
Russell takes pole for Azerbaijan GP, Antonelli crashes out
-
Pope warns against losing humanity in AI-driven 'paradise of machines'
-
Williams boss hails Chadwick as F1 inspiration for women
-
Pope warns against losing humanity in 'paradise of machines'
-
World No.1 Sinner delays return with China Open withdrawal
-
From FBI warning to literary acclaim: the Russian journalist who took on Putin
-
South Lebanon children return to school destroyed by Israel strike
-
China swimmer in Asian Games first as North Korea lifters reign
-
Jewish group urges Berlin far-left vote winners to tackle antisemitism
-
French literary prize removes novel from longlist after AI claims
-
European stock markets climb as oil prices drop
-
China's Zhang wins record seventh Asian Games swimming gold
-
Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll finally has her damages
UN court opinion due on occupied Palestinian land
The UN's top court will on Friday hand down its view on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories since 1967, amid growing international pressure over the war in Gaza.
Any opinion delivered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) would be non-binding, but it comes amid mounting concern over Israel's war against Hamas sparked by the group's brutal October 7 attacks.
A separate high-profile case brought before the court by South Africa alleges that Israel has committed genocidal acts during its Gaza offensive.
Judges will read their findings at 1300 GMT at the opulent Peace Palace in The Hague, the home of the ICJ.
The UN's General Assembly asked the ICJ in late 2022 to give an "advisory opinion" on the "legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem".
The ICJ held a week-long session in February to hear submissions from countries following the request -- supported by most countries within the Assembly.
Most speakers too during the hearings called on Israel to end its 57-year occupation. They warned a prolonged occupation posed an "extreme danger" to stability in the Middle East and beyond.
But the United States said Israel should not be legally obliged to withdraw without taking its "very real security needs" into account.
Israel did not take part in the oral hearings.
Instead, it submitted a written contribution in which it described the questions the court had been asked as "prejudicial" and "tendentious".
- 'Ongoing violation' -
The General Assembly has asked the ICJ to consider two questions.
Firstly, the court should examine the legal consequences of what the UN called "the ongoing violation by Israel of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination".
This relates to the "prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967" and "measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem".
In June 1967, Israel crushed some of its Arab neighbours in a six-day war, seizing the West Bank including east Jerusalem from Jordan, the Golan Heights from Syria, and the Gaza Strip and Sinai Peninsula from Egypt.
Israel then began to settle the 70,000 square kilometres (27,000 square miles) of seized Arab territory.
The UN later declared the occupation of Palestinian territory illegal, and Cairo regained Sinai under its 1979 peace deal with Israel.
The ICJ has also been asked to look into the consequences of what it described as Israel's "adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures".
Secondly, the ICJ should advise on how Israel's actions "affect the legal status of the occupation" and what are the consequences for the UN and other countries.
The ICJ rules in disputes between states. Normally, its judgements are binding although it has little means to enforce them.
In this case however, the opinion it issues will be non-binding, although most advisory opinions are in fact acted upon.
V.Fontes--PC