-
Venezuela's quake-hit La Guaira port 'operational': US military
-
Tech rebound lifts Dow to record, yen hits 40-year low against dollar
-
US Supreme Court rules on dragnet searches of cellphone location data
-
Madueke says he can be England's World Cup game-changer
-
South Korea fans target coach Hong with boos as World Cup squad returns
-
Switzerland returns famed Benin Bronzes to Nigeria
-
Vaughan calls for England change after Stokes bows out with defeat
-
Last-gasp Brazil down Japan to reach World Cup 16
-
Europe's deadly heatwave scorches east, Slovakia hits record
-
Spain confident despite World Cup injury setbacks, says Llorente
-
French Open champ Andreeva sails into Wimbledon second round
-
Martinelli scores in 95th minute to send Brazil into World Cup last 16
-
Shooter in custody dispute kills six at German family shelter
-
US races to reopen Venezuela port as quake deaths top 1,700
-
Latham hails 'old school' New Zealand after downing England
-
Serena set for much-anticipated Wimbledon return
-
US races to reopen Venezuela port for aid after twin quakes
-
Ex-NBA stars Malik Beasley, Ed Davis indicted in betting case
-
Paris funeral homes overwhelmed after record heatwave
-
France wary of Sweden side with 'nothing to lose' at World Cup
-
Pyjamas and bets: Brazil YouTube channel reshapes World Cup viewing
-
Bloodied but unbowed: Sinner avoids shock exit at start of Wimbledon title defence
-
Queueing, strawberries and all white: it must be Wimbledon
-
Top US court upholds $5mn Trump sex assault judgment
-
Stokes backs Brook '100 percent' to succeed him as England Test captain
-
Sinner survives scare to reach Wimbledon second round
-
Ebola outbreak in DR Congo spreads to fourth province
-
Six killed in German 'family tragedy' shooting: police
-
Czech Republic coach Koubek quits after World Cup flop
-
Osaka makes spectacular Wimbledon arrival in kimono-inspired dress
-
French parliament adopts bill to regulate fast fashion
-
Bolivia removes 15-year dollar peg in bid to revive economy
-
Supreme Court boosts Trump's power to fire officials, but protects Fed
-
Russia jails veteran who threatened Putin with mutiny
-
Three things we learned from the Austrian F1 Grand Prix
-
Five shot dead at German youth welfare site, two suspects arrested
-
Burnham pledges radical devolution of UK govt if PM
-
Polish businesses press Warsaw, Kyiv to end political rift
-
Tour de France 'ready to adapt' amid extreme heatwave
-
Hovland beats Scheffler in playoff for PGA Travelers title
-
New Zealand thrash England for series win as Stokes bows out
-
Man City hire Maresca to start new era after Guardiola
-
Trump says Iran meeting to take place in Qatar
-
Pegula slams Vondrousova's 'harsh' doping ban
-
Spain raises 2026 growth forecast despite Mideast war turmoil
-
Chavez-era housing complex in ruins after Venezuela quakes
-
Kenya-US rare earths deal challenged in court over secrecy
-
Sinner, Djokovic set to start Wimbledon title charge
-
Santner strikes as New Zealand eye England series win
-
Pakistan launches deadliest attack on Afghanistan in months
Clickbait or creativity? The art world wrestles with AI
Online tools that can create wonderful, absurd and sometimes horrifying images using artificial intelligence (AI) have exploded in popularity, sparking soul-searching over the nature of art.
Tech companies tout their inventions as a liberating force of art for all, but purists argue that the artist is still the central cog in the machine.
Art historian and AI expert Emily L. Spratt, whose forthcoming book tackles the ethics and regulation of AI art, told AFP that the art world has not yet found a response to the potentially transformative technology.
Are we all artists now?
Punch a few keywords into an AI art tool -- something like "Brad Pitt in a rowing boat in space in the style of Mondrian" -- and seconds later boldly coloured line drawings will emerge of the Hollywood star, paddling in the stars.
There are plenty of fans of tools like Midjourney, Stable Diffusion and DALL-E 2 who have proclaimed this as the democratisation of art.
But Spratt reckons such tools are more about "entertainment and clickbait" than art.
"It is a way to foster engagement with platforms, which is of course going to help these companies," she said.
"The idea that it is solely a tool of empowerment or that it will democratise the space is overly simplistic -- it's naive."
Rather, she sees the boundary between AI and other technology becoming blurred, pointing to the image manipulation programs already widely used.
"I see the future of AI as being part of the omnipresent background architecture for all digital image-making processes," she said.
"It will be hard to avoid it because it seeps into all of our digital interactions, often unbeknownst to us, especially when we create, edit, or search images."
Are there AI masterpieces?
Beyond the simple online tools that anyone can use, there are plenty of artists labouring over their own algorithms with bespoke datasets.
These works sell for tens of thousands, sometimes hundreds of thousands.
A standout practitioner, said Spratt, is German artist Mario Klingemann whose "Hyperdimensional Attraction Series, Bestiary" is a high point of the genre.
"It is a video of seemingly organic forms that morph from one physical entity to another and momentarily appear as recognisable animals," she said.
"Honestly, it's a bit unnerving but it works well as a commentary on the dividing lines between the material and immaterial and the limits of generative AI to replicate the natural world."
She said his art is constantly asking questions about AI as a medium, and more widely about the nature of creativity.
What does art world make of AI?
Until relatively recently, there was very little buzz around AI outside of video installations, largely because there was no bank of digital images with clear labels.
Without the source material, there could be no AI art as we know it today.
That changed a decade ago when several projects began to supply huge quantities of digital images, sparking an explosion in creativity.
A French collective called Obvious sold a work for more than $400,000 in 2018 after keenly embracing the idea that the AI "created" the work.
That sale became hugely controversial after it emerged that they had used an algorithm written by artist and programmer Robbie Barrat.
"The reason that the Obvious artwork sold, especially at that price, was largely because it was advertised as the first AI artwork to be offered at a major auction house," said Spratt.
"It was really the art market experimenting with the offering of an AI artwork in step with long-established approaches to the sale of fine art."
At that moment, she said, there was huge interest in bringing together the tech sector and the art world.
But the tech industry has since been hit by a dramatic economic slump and investment and interest have waned.
Major auction houses like Christie's and Sotheby's have since worked hard to create separate platforms for selling AI art.
"It's like they don't want to sully fine art with these new digital explorations," Spratt said.
And critics are yet to catch up with the field and really express what is good, bad or indifferent, she reckoned.
"Unfortunately, the AI art discourse is not there yet, but I think it is on its way, and it should come from the field of art history," she insisted.
E.Borba--PC