-
Germany could miss climate goal in 2026 for first time: think tank
-
Duplantis needs A-game to fend off Karalis pressure
-
New flood risks impede Nepal, Tibet rescue
-
Architect Minenhle Makhanya Ordered to Repay R147 Million for Nkandla Upgrades
-
Kolbe back as Springboks change two for All Blacks Test
-
Iran says still open to diplomacy as war with US hits six months
-
Europe's monarchs, world leaders mourn Norway's King Harald
-
20,000 Salmon Return to Klamath River Following Dam Removal, Yet Recovery Faces Ongoing Challenges
-
Jamie Vardy channel to broadcast Bundesliga games
-
King Harald, 'symbol' of Norway, dead at 89
-
STARCARES Completes Basketball Court Revamp in the Philippines, Benefiting Nearly 20,000 People
-
Norway's new King Haakon, popular face of shaken monarchy
-
Norway's new Queen Mette-Marit, a fairytale beset by woe
-
Most stocks rise as attention turns to Warsh speech
-
Nepal orders rescuers to safety as overflow brings new flood risks
-
Japanese rugby U-turns on limits on naturalised players
-
Norway's King Harald V, unifying force who weathered family storms
-
Norway's King Harald dead at 89
-
Australia's McKeown vows to reclaim backstroke world records
-
Climate change hits trout and salmon in UK's prized chalk streams
-
Boston Legacy FC Delays White Stadium Debut to 2028
-
Škoda Octavia Marks 30 Years With Nearly 7.9 Million Units Produced
-
Cancer fears stalk Kosovo's coal heartland
-
Nepal seeking to reach survivors in tunnel as risk of new floods rises
-
Gladys Knight to Reduce Tour Schedule Amid Health Concerns
-
Anger in Austria over business park on former Nazi camp site
-
Galápagos Coral Fossils Reveal Global Warming Intensifies El Niño Cycles
-
In shadow of Premier League, Serie A flexes financial muscle
-
Springboks 'old guard' seek revenge over All Blacks
-
Tanker pays record $5.3 mn to transit Panama Canal: administrator
-
'Find your own room': Japan says can't handle added Asian Games numbers
-
Pilgrims seeking peace caught in deadly Nepal-Tibet floods
-
Fresh flood warnings for disaster-hit Nepal and Tibet, 1,400 still missing
-
China's help critical, but unlikely, for US to choke off Iran
-
Most Asian stocks advance as attention turns to Warsh speech
-
US court rules Pentagon ban of Anthropic unlawful
-
US mother's child murder trial puts spotlight on postpartum psychosis
-
In Zambia, a Shaolin Temple offers a softer face of China
-
'End of an era': Players lament decline of the disc at Gamescom
-
Messi's Inter Miami appoint new coach Gonzalez
-
Air traffic controllers left early before deadly NY crash: report
-
Clashes in Spain's Ceuta month after mass migrant influx
-
Golf media firm loses Callaway, PGA Tour deals over violent ad
-
Argentina names unchanged side for Australia Test
-
US to push economic pressure on Iran at G20 finance talks
-
Australia's Lee leads PGA Tour Championship
-
Kiss rotates Wallabies forwards for Argentina Test
-
US judge urged to rebuff restoring Trump name to Kennedy Center
-
Guns, drugs and car chases: GTA 6 preview lands on Netflix after leaks
-
Trump orders Lake Ontario to be renamed 'Lake America'
Study links major polluters to big climate damages bill
The economic cost of carbon emissions is far higher than previously estimated, said a new study Wednesday that links big polluters to tens of trillions of dollars in climate-related damages worldwide.
The study in the journal Nature measures how human-caused warming affects economic growth and assigns a share of global damages to specific emitters -- from major economies to oil giants.
The findings land as a growing wave of lawsuits seek to hold fossil fuel producers and other carbon-heavy businesses accountable for climate "loss and damage".
Claimants argue that large polluters are legally liable for their outsized contribution to climate change and its associated extreme weather events, particularly in poorer nations.
This study did not seek to answer the "legal and ethical" question of compensation, said Marshall Burke, a professor at Stanford University and the study's lead author.
"Our goal was first and foremost scientific, but we hope to contribute to the broader policy discussion of how to measure loss and damage and what to do about it," Burke told AFP.
It does offer "guidance" on the scale of potential costs and a framework "for estimating how specific emissions from specific emitters at specific points in time lead to damages" worldwide, he added.
They assessed the impact of rising temperatures on economic factors including labour productivity and agriculture, but also some associated climate-driven weather extremes.
US emissions between 1990 and 2020 were the largest source of estimated global damages at $10.2 trillion followed by China ($8.7 trillion) and the European Union ($6.4 trillion).
Emissions linked to Saudi oil giant Saudi Aramco between 1988 and 2015 resulted in $3 trillion in cumulative global economic damages by 2020, the study also said.
- Settling debts -
But the authors found the largest share of climate damages lies ahead.
"We were surprised not only by the overall magnitude of estimated damages, which are in the tens of trillions of dollars, but also by how much larger future damages from past emissions are than past damages from past emissions," Burke said.
One tonne of C02 emitted in 1990 caused about $180 in global damages by 2020, but was expected to inflict a further $1,840 through 2100 -- roughly 10 times more than the costs already incurred.
This is because CO2 has a long lifespan, lingering in the atmosphere where it contributes to warming for decades to come.
For this reason "settling debts for past damages will not settle debts for past emissions", the authors wrote.
Even under relatively conservative assumptions, the cost per tonne of carbon emitted is far higher than many government estimates.
The research also highlights how high-emitting activities such as air travel contribute to future damage. Taking a long-haul flight each year over a decade, for example, could generate around $25,000 in losses by 2100.
As emissions rise and poorer nations bear the brunt, wealthy countries and fossil fuel businesses are facing mounting scrutiny over their disproportionate role in driving climate damage.
Last year, a separate Nature study found extreme heat linked to emissions from 111 fossil fuel companies caused $28 trillion in global economic losses between 1991 and 2020.
Companies have long argued it is impossible to attribute harm from a global problem to any single emitter, and courts have been cautious about awarding compensation.
E.Ramalho--PC