-
North Korea demands South show 'utmost respect' to restore relations
-
Tenzing Norgay's son says Himalayas sending climate warning
-
Saudi says three dead in airport attacks claimed by Houthis
-
On your bike! Bottas opts for two wheels to reach Singapore GP
-
'Mad dream': New showcase for African film opens in London
-
Alcaraz, Sinner, Osaka commit to Australian Open '1 Point Slam'
-
All Blacks coach Rennie says Wallabies exit 'part of the game'
-
Dodgers beat Braves to advance in MLB playoffs, Rays oust Yankees
-
The growing protests against India's poll body - and PM Modi
-
'A sun as black as my lungs': how corruption crucified a polluted Albania city
-
Stocks fall further as oil spike fans fresh inflation worries
-
The British historian helping the French rediscover de Gaulle
-
Bad COP, worse COP? EU tempers hopes for UN climate summit
-
Dodgers beat Braves to advance, Guardians survive in MLB playoffs
-
Rookie Henry named in Wallabies midfield to face All Blacks
-
Latin American, Caribbean women top Nobel literature buzz
-
Housing crisis set to dominate Spain's snap election
-
US says Fiji-based Chinese official paid bribes for Beijing
-
Gas, health care, utilities: high costs squeeze US midterm voters
-
After botched US execution, Christa Pike was nearly taken off life support
-
New Zealand Rugby seeks injunction over PNG Chiefs name
-
Guinea-Bissau junta urges military unit loyal to ex-president to disarm
-
Samsung expects 780% quarterly operating profit jump on AI boom
-
As species decline, green turtles offer glimmer of hope
-
Guardians survive with 9-3 win over White Sox
-
Brothers Scott and Beauden Barrett named to start for All Blacks
-
Saudi Arabia says 3 dead at airports after Houthis claim attacks
-
EU trade chief seeks to dial down China tensions
-
Stocks slide as oil sees volatile trading day over Iran war fears
-
'Never again Bolsonaro': thousands march ahead of Brazil election runoff
-
Microsoft pushes AI vision with new, expensive Surface laptop
-
After botched execution, US woman was nearly taken off life support before revival
-
Five children among 28 killed in Russian strikes on Ukraine
-
Searing AIDS drama 'Elsinore' opens London film festival
-
Odell Beckham Jr signs with Minnesota Vikings
-
Evicted pensioner who sparked Spain housing protests dies: tenant union
-
Saudi Arabia says three dead at airports after Houthis claim attacks
-
Golf star Rahm quitting LIV tour over 'unacceptable' terms
-
Trump plans to turn Florida golf course into presidential retreat
-
Thousands march fearing return of a Bolsonaro presidency in Brazil
-
WHO says cannot conduct full risk assessment on Russia plague reports
-
French PM denies police ordered to confront student protesters
-
After botched execution, US woman is awake and shackled to bed
-
Rubio touts US power, calls on Europe to emerge from 'slumber'
-
New Zealand fly-half Mo'unga ruled out of Australia Tests
-
Trump says 'we don't think' Russian plague is bio-weapon
-
Protests in major Turkish city after mayor defects to Erdogan party
-
Five children among 26 killed in Ukraine after Russian strikes
-
Climate change strips island's title of largest penguin colony: study
-
Man City should 'accept' punishment for rule breaches, says Lineker
Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump presidential immunity claim
The US Supreme Court agreed on Wednesday to hear Donald Trump's claim that as a former president he enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution, as the 2024 White House candidate faces dozens of state and federal charges.
The court scheduled arguments in the high-stakes case for the week of April 22 and said Trump's trial on charges of conspiring to overturn the 2020 election would remain on hold for now.
Trump had been scheduled to go on trial for election interference on March 4 but the proceedings have been frozen as his presidential immunity claim wound its way through the courts.
The Supreme Court said it would address the question of "whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office."
It will be among the most consequential election law cases to reach the court since it halted the Florida vote recount in 2000 with Republican George W. Bush narrowly leading Democrat Al Gore.
A three-judge appeals court panel ruled earlier this month that the 77-year-old Trump has no immunity from prosecution as a former president.
Trump's claim to be immune from criminal liability for actions he took while in the White House is "unsupported by precedent, history or the text and structure of the Constitution," the judges said in a unanimous opinion.
"We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter," they said.
The ruling was a major legal setback for Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination and the first ex-president to be criminally indicted.
The appeals court put the immunity ruling on hold to give Trump the opportunity to appeal to the Supreme Court.
Special Counsel Jack Smith filed the election conspiracy case against Trump in August and had been pushing hard for the March start date for his trial.
Lawyers for the former president have sought repeatedly to delay the trial until after the November election, when Trump could potentially have all of the federal cases against him dropped if he wins the White House again.
- Colorado case -
Trump also faces 2020 election interference charges in Georgia, and has been indicted in Florida for allegedly mishandling classified information.
He was impeached twice by the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives while in office -- once for inciting an insurrection -- but acquitted both times by the Senate.
The immunity case is one of two election-related cases before the Supreme Court.
The Colorado Supreme Court barred Trump in December from appearing on the Republican presidential primary ballot in the state because of his role in the January 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol by his supporters.
Trump appealed the Colorado ruling and the conservative-majority Supreme Court heard arguments in the case in early February.
Both conservative and liberal justices expressed concern during arguments about having individual states decide which candidates can be on the presidential ballot this November.
A.F.Rosado--PC