-
Major earthquake rocks Panama, triggers tsunami warning
-
Brewers aim to take down two-time defending champion Dodgers in NLCS rematch
-
Indian jailed in France for leading sadist Nazi cult that tortured girls
-
Tsunami alert after major earthquake rocks Panama
-
'Iron Mike' Ditka hailed as 'gold standard' NFL legend
-
Outer bands of Hurricane Isaias lash US Gulf Coast
-
Flydubai co-pilot planned suicide attack on Tel Aviv airport: UAE prosecutor
-
Hope, Rutherford fire West Indies to record T20 chase of 250
-
Mike Ditka: Chicago Bears icon as player and coach
-
Farhan leads Pakistan to T20 win over Sri Lanka
-
Outrage over plan to livestream US military firing squad execution
-
Turkey sack coach Montella after Nations League woe
-
US sanctions: a 'test of resilience' for ICC
-
US announces sanctions on ICC, hours after Nobel award to former judge
-
NFL legend Mike Ditka dead at 86
-
Montenegro expels popular Russian war blogger wanted by US
-
Hurricane Isaias set to strike Gulf Coast late Friday
-
Rubio calls on all Venezuela opposition figures to join talks with govt
-
Trump forms panel to probe US Fed governor Lisa Cook
-
Australia struggle against South Africa quicks in first Test
-
Clashes in Durban as fresh anti-migrant riots erupt in South Africa
-
Stocks advance as Trump rules out pre-vote Iran attack
-
France students plan more protests, UN 'concerned' over violence
-
Australia struggle against South Africa's fast bowlers
-
De Zerbi calls on struggling Spurs to react in Man Utd clash
-
Massive debt puts France in a bind as investor doubts deepen
-
US sanctions on ICC: a 'test of resilience'
-
Arteta urges 'respect' for process after Man City financial verdict
-
Outrage over US military plan to livestream firing squad execution
-
'Human-authored' book labels gain ground amid AI scandals
-
Argentina snap up defence guru Edwards ahead of World Cup
-
Man City whistleblower Pinto to stay under police protection
-
BMW pulls car lease offer from German far-right politician
-
US leads fresh Ukraine peace push with Miami talks
-
Brazil election offers Jair Bolsonaro a shot at revenge
-
Verstappen continues resurgence with pole for Singapore sprint
-
Man Utd boss Carrick 'personally' affected by Man City verdict
-
Cuban ration book, symbol of the revolution, gathers dust
-
Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. Raises Fiscal 2026 Revenue Guidance 62% at Midpoint to $10–$11 Million and Reaffirms $400–$460 Million Fiscal 2027 Outlook
-
Stocks advance, oil retreats as Trump rules out pre-vote Iran attack
-
Red Bull's Verstappen takes pole position for Singapore GP sprint race
-
Man City case causing 'uncertainty' for whole Premier League, says Iraola
-
Chelsea star Palmer 'committed' to England insists Alonso
-
Talks with Iran can only succeed without threats, president says
-
OpenAI denies firing researchers over AI safety warnings
-
Home hope Zheng sets up Mertens clash in China Open semis
-
Turkey warns opposition, press over investment fund crisis
-
Lombardia promises gripping end to season in Pogacar absence
-
Hurricane Isaias now major storm as it heads to US Gulf Coast
-
Barca skipper Raphinha out against Getafe and Galatasaray
US Supreme Court to hear high-stakes Trump immunity claim
The US Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday on whether Donald Trump, as a former president, should be immune from criminal prosecution for acts he committed while in office.
The nine justices' ruling could have far-reaching implications for the extent of US executive power -- and Trump's own multiple legal issues as he seeks the White House again.
And while most constitutional law experts expect Trump to suffer a legal defeat, he may already have won a political victory.
By agreeing to take the case, the court delayed -- perhaps indefinitely -- the start of Trump's trial on charges of conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 election won by Democrat Joe Biden.
The question of whether an ex-president is immune from prosecution is an untested one in American jurisprudence because until Trump, a former White House occupant had never been charged with a crime.
"Famously, Richard Nixon engaged in criminal law-breaking," said James Sample, a constitutional law professor at Hofstra University.
"But because he resigned, and (Nixon's successor) Gerald Ford then pardoned him, we have never had to squarely address the notion of a criminal prosecution against a former president."
Special Counsel Jack Smith filed the election conspiracy case against the 77-year-old Trump in August and had been pushing hard for a March start date for the trial.
But Trump's lawyers filed a blizzard of motions seeking to postpone the case against the Republican presidential candidate, including the claim that a former president enjoys "absolute immunity" from prosecution.
Two lower courts flatly rejected that argument but the Supreme Court, which includes three justices nominated by Trump, agreed in late February to hear the case.
In one ruling, a lower court said Trump's immunity claim is "unsupported by precedent, history or the text and structure of the Constitution."
"We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter," the judges said.
- 'Jack Smith 1, Donald Trump 0' -
Sample and other legal scholars said the Supreme Court was unlikely to hold that a president enjoys blanket immunity from prosecution.
"I find it hard to believe that even this very, very conservative, very pro-Trump Supreme Court will be inclined to find in favor of an argument that says a president is completely immune, basically, no matter what he does.
"That would be a holding that would be subject to abuse by presidents of all parties.
"I think the scoreboard will read Jack Smith 1, Donald Trump 0," Sample said, adding "the election year calendar will be of greater consequence."
Steven Schwinn, a University of Illinois Chicago law professor, agreed.
"Even if the court hands Trump a decisive, unqualified defeat, the prosecution will have to scramble to get the trial before the (November) election," he said.
Randall Eliason, a former US attorney who teaches law at George Washington University, said the unique circumstances surrounding the case would justify a quick decision by the Supreme Court, although the justices may wait until the end of their current term in June to issue a ruling.
"We've never before had a situation where a defendant would potentially have the chance to cancel his own prosecution if he wins reelection," Eliason said.
"The people have a right to have these criminal charges tried, and if Trump is reelected, there's a chance they will never be tried."
Arguing for immunity, Trump has said that without it "a president will not be able to properly function, or make decisions, in the best interest of the United States of America."
Smith rebuffed that argument in a filing with the Supreme Court.
"The President's constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed does not entail a general right to violate them," he said.
Trump also faces 2020 election charges in Georgia and has been indicted in Florida for allegedly mishandling classified information after leaving the White House.
Opening arguments began at his trial in New York on Monday on state charges of falsifying business records by paying pre-2016 election "hush money" to a porn star.
H.Silva--PC