-
Stocks move lower despite oil prices dropping
-
Brazil's patron saint pulled into latest election scrap
-
AI driving up innovation investment: UN
-
Football overload leaves players near 'breaking point', warns Tebas
-
UN Security Council extends Haiti mission by 6 months
-
Paris Eiffel Tower says chief to step down after uproar over removing women staff
-
Man Utd do not deserve medals if Man City stripped of titles: Rooney
-
Amaze Holdings (NYSE: AMZE) Executes Binding LOI to Acquire BullionFX | Alchemy, a Decentralized Gold-Backed Financial Ecosystem for Valued at US$155 Million
-
Vana Completes Expanded Staking as Part of the Vega Upgrade, Publishes Expanded VANA Token Economics
-
Clashes between French teens, police as school blockades intensify
-
Spain to cap gas price hikes, extend fuel discounts
-
Stocks move sideways despite oil moving lower
-
'We just need rain': Germany's Rhine river hits new low
-
African leaders to gather in Egypt for business summit
-
Yemen health system at 'breaking point': WHO
-
UK decides against charging foreign visitors for museums
-
Ireland undecided on second Israel match: coach
-
Dallaglio to sell England World Cup winners' medal
-
France's Le Pen defiant after top ally hit by antisemitism claims
-
Brazil come from behind to beat Australia 4-2 in friendly
-
Tom Cruise trades stunts for satire as toxic tycoon 'Digger'
-
Ruthless An retains Asian Games badminton crown as Kunlavut triumphs
-
MEXC Unveils "WE SEE YOU" Brand Visual Refresh, Putting People Behind Every Trade in Focus
-
Alonso to stay with F1 team Aston Martin in 2027
-
Thai capital cleans up after deadly floods
-
China badminton 'still strong' despite Asian Games slump
-
NATO, EU allies rally to Estonia after 'sabotage' blamed on Russia
-
'Exceptional' Turner painting shown in Rome before sale
-
Families demand justice for Cameroon's 'nightmare' wave of murdered women
-
European stocks climb as oil dips
-
Tebas says Man City should face 'most severe' sanctions if guilty of rule breaches
-
Spain aims to ban evictions until 2030 amid housing protests
-
Pochettino calls Man City success 'a period of deception'
-
Kunlavut first Thai man to win Asian Games badminton singles gold
-
Settler attack on West Bank village injures Israeli forces, drawing rare rebuke
-
French far right says antisemitism claims part of 'total war' to derail presidency bid
-
Mystery over UK airbase scare after reports no explosives found
-
'Gift from God': Rain brings relief from Indonesia toxic haze
-
Spanish govt races to adopt housing law under protest pressure
-
Ex-world snooker champion jailed for 7 years for child sex crimes
-
Estonia slams Russian 'sabotage' after arson attack on defence company
-
French teens clash with police as school blockades intensify
-
Slovenia sees surge in '.si' sites after Trump hypes 'super intelligence'
-
FIFA accuses UEFA of 'misinformation campaign' in bid for World Cup papers
-
'Like a dream' for An as Games organisers 'sorry' for latest mix-up
-
Myanmar airstrike toll hits 50 as families gather dead
-
Tokyo suffers longest streak of rainy days on record
-
STARTRADER Raises Lloyd's of London Client Fund Insurance to USD 30 Million in Aggregate
-
Indonesia charges train driver over crash that killed 16 women
-
North Korean DMZ landmine blasts 'violation of armistice': Seoul
America's passion for tariffs rarely pays off, economists warn
Long before Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" announcement, the United States had toyed with imposing high tariffs throughout its history, with inconclusive -- and sometimes catastrophic -- results.
"We have a 20th century president in a 21st century economy who wants to take us back to the 19th century," Dartmouth College economics professor Douglas Irwin posted on X.
The 19th century marked the golden age of tariffs in the United States, with an average rate regularly flirting with 50 percent.
The century extended a doctrine adopted since the country's founding, which advocated for the protection of the American economy as it underwent a period of industrialization.
"Careful studies of that period suggest that the tariffs did help protect domestic development of industry to some degree," said Keith Maskus, a professor at the University of Colorado.
"But the two more important factors were access to international labor, and capital... which was flowing in the United States during that period," he added.
Christopher Meissner, a professor at the University of California, Davis, told AFP that in addition to these factors, "the reason we had a thriving industrial sector in the United States was we had great access to natural resources."
These resources included coal, oil, iron ore, copper and timber -- all of which were crucial to industry.
"The industrial sector wouldn't have been much smaller if we had much lower tariffs," Meissner added.
Shortly after taking office in January, Trump said: "We were at our richest from 1870 to 1913."
The 78-year-old Republican often references former US president William McKinley, who was behind one of the country's most restrictive tariff laws, which passed in 1890.
These tariffs did not prevent imports from continuing to grow in the years that followed, although once customs duties were lowered in 1894, the amount of goods the US purchased abroad remained below previous peaks.
- Great Depression -
In 1929, Harvard professor George Roorbach wrote: "Since the end of the Civil War (1865), during which the United States has been under a protective system almost, if not quite, without interruption, our import trade has enormously expanded."
"Fluctuations that have occurred seem to be related chiefly to factors other than the ups and downs of tariff rates," he added.
A year later, the young nation tightened the screws with tariffs again, this time under Republican president Herbert Hoover.
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 is best remembered "for triggering a global trade war and deepening the Great Depression," according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
"What generated the depression... was a lot of complicated factors, but the tariff increase is one of them," said Maskus from the University of Colorado.
The end of the Second World War marked the start of a new era in trade, defined by the ratification in 1947 by 23 countries -- including the United States -- of the GATT free trade agreement.
The agreement created the conditions for the development of international trade by imposing more moderate customs duties.
The momentum was maintained by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the United States, Mexico and Canada, which took effect in 1994.
Alongside NAFTA, free trade in the United States was further expanded by the creation of the World Trade Organization in 1995, and a 2004 free trade agreement between the United States and several Central American countries.
During his first term in office, Donald Trump reopened the tariff ledger and decided on new measures against China, many of which were maintained under his successor, Joe Biden.
But despite these levies, the US trade deficit with China continued to grow until 2022, when China was hit by a brutal economic slowdown unrelated to the tariffs.
For Keith Maskus, the tariffs on Beijing did not do much to prevent the growth of imports from China.
E.Borba--PC