-
M23 militia says to pull out of key DR Congo city at US's request
-
Thousands of glaciers to melt each year by mid-century: study
-
China to impose anti-dumping duties on EU pork for five years
-
Nepal starts tiger census to track recovery
-
Economic losses from natural disasters down by a third in 2025: Swiss Re
-
Indonesians reeling from flood devastation plea for global help
-
Timeline: How the Bondi Beach mass shooting unfolded
-
On the campaign trail in a tug-of-war Myanmar town
-
Bondi Beach suspect visited Philippines on Indian passport
-
Kenyan girls still afflicted by genital mutilation years after ban
-
Djokovic to warm up for Australian Open in Adelaide
-
Man bailed for fire protest on track at Hong Kong's richest horse race
-
Men's ATP tennis to apply extreme heat rule from 2026
-
10-year-old girl, Holocaust survivors among Bondi Beach dead
-
Steelers edge towards NFL playoffs as Dolphins eliminated
-
Australian PM says 'Islamic State ideology' drove Bondi Beach gunmen
-
Canada plow-maker can't clear path through Trump tariffs
-
Bank of Japan expected to hike rates to 30-year high
-
Cunningham leads Pistons past Celtics
-
Stokes tells England to 'show a bit of dog' in must-win Adelaide Test
-
EU to unveil plan to tackle housing crisis
-
EU set to scrap 2035 combustion-engine ban in car industry boost
-
Australian PM visits Bondi Beach hero in hospital
-
'Easiest scam in the world': Musicians sound alarm over AI impersonators
-
'Waiting to die': the dirty business of recycling in Vietnam
-
Asian markets retreat ahead of US jobs as tech worries weigh
-
Famed Jerusalem stone still sells despite West Bank economic woes
-
Trump sues BBC for $10 billion over documentary speech edit
-
Chile follows Latin American neighbors in lurching right
-
Will OpenAI be the next tech giant or next Netscape?
-
Khawaja left out as Australia's Cummins, Lyon back for 3rd Ashes Test
-
Australia PM says 'Islamic State ideology' drove Bondi Beach shooters
-
Scheffler wins fourth straight PGA Tour Player of the Year
-
New APAC Partnership with Matter Brings Market Logic Software's Always-On Insights Solutions to Local Brand and Experience Leaders
-
Security beefed up for Ashes Test after Bondi shooting
-
Wembanyama blocking Knicks path in NBA Cup final
-
Amorim seeks clinical Man Utd after 'crazy' Bournemouth clash
-
Man Utd blow lead three times in 4-4 Bournemouth thriller
-
Stokes calls on England to 'show a bit of dog' in must-win Adelaide Test
-
Trump 'considering' push to reclassify marijuana as less dangerous
-
Chiefs coach Reid backing Mahomes recovery after knee injury
-
Trump says Ukraine deal close, Europe proposes peace force
-
French minister urges angry farmers to trust cow culls, vaccines
-
Angelina Jolie reveals mastectomy scars in Time France magazine
-
Paris Olympics, Paralympics 'net cost' drops to 2.8bn euros: think tank
-
Chile president-elect dials down right-wing rhetoric, vows unity
-
Five Rob Reiner films that rocked, romanced and riveted
-
Rob Reiner: Hollywood giant and political activist
-
Observers say Honduran election fair, but urge faster count
-
Europe proposes Ukraine peace force as Zelensky hails 'real progress' with US
US Supreme Court curtails power of individual judges to block Trump
A divided US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a major victory on Friday by curbing the power of lone federal judges to block executive actions.
In a 6-3 ruling stemming from Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, the court said nationwide injunctions issued by district court judges "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts."
The top court did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order seeking to end automatic citizenship for children born on American soil.
But the broader decision on the scope of judicial rulings removes a big roadblock to Trump's often highly controversial policy agenda and has far-reaching ramifications for the ability of the judiciary to rein in Trump or future American presidents.
Trump celebrated by telling reporters he had "a whole list" of policies he could now proceed on without opposition in the courts.
Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship is just one of a number of his moves that have been blocked by judges around the country -- both Democratic and Republican appointees – since he took office in January.
Courts have, for example, blocked or slowed down his hardline immigration crackdown, firing of federal employees, efforts to end diversity programs and punitive actions against law firms and universities.
Past presidents have also complained about national injunctions shackling their agenda, but such orders have sharply risen under Trump, who saw more in his first two months than Democrat Joe Biden did during his first three years in office.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee who authored the majority opinion joined by the other five conservative justices, said "the universal injunction was conspicuously nonexistent for most of our Nation's history."
"Federal courts do not exercise general oversight of the Executive Branch," Barrett wrote.
"When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too," she said.
The three liberal justices dissented with Justice Sonia Sotomayor saying "no right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates."
"The Court's decision is nothing less than an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution," Sotomayor said.
"The Executive Branch can now enforce policies that flout settled law and violate countless individuals' constitutional rights, and the federal courts will be hamstrung to stop its actions fully," she said.
- 'GIANT WIN' -
Trump, in a post on Truth Social, welcomed the ruling as a "GIANT WIN."
The case was ostensibly about Trump's executive order ending birthright citizenship, which was deemed unconstitutional by courts in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state.
But it actually focused on whether a single federal district court judge has the right to issue a nationwide block to a presidential decree with a universal injunction.
The issue has become a rallying cry for Trump and his Republican allies, who accuse the judiciary of impeding his agenda against the will of voters.
Steven Schwinn, a law professor at the University of Illinois Chicago, said the court's ruling "sharply undermines the power of federal courts to rein-in lawless actions by the government."
"The ruling will likely create a patchwork of birthright citizenship rights," Schwinn told AFP, where it is recognized in some locations for people who have successfully sued and not recognized for people who have not sued.
"This patchwork approach to individual rights is inconsistent with our history and tradition of federal rights in the United States and is inconsistent with the rule of law," he said.
The Trump administration had asked the Supreme Court to restrict the application of a district court's injunction solely to the parties who brought the case and the district where the judge presides.
Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship decrees that children born to parents in the United States illegally or on temporary visas would not automatically become citizens.
The three lower courts ruled that to be a violation of the 14th Amendment, which states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."
J.V.Jacinto--PC