-
Pharma heavyweights clash over anti-obesity drug ads
-
EU cancels subsidy to Venice Biennale over Russia presence
-
Hungary raids Orban's Fidesz party servers in graft probe
-
Heavy rain dampens search for dozens missing in Afghanistan flood
-
General Motors lifts 2026 outlook despite hit from electric retreat
-
Argentina represented themselves in 'best possible way' at World Cup: Fernandez
-
Uproar in France over reintroduction of bee-harming pesticides
-
Philippines, China summon ambassadors over clash in disputed waters
-
Kuwaitis ration electricity as Iran hits power grid
-
'White elephant': Colombia's anti-corruption activist turned senator
-
Former Man Utd boss Ferguson salutes old rival Keegan
-
Stock markets, oil prices climb
-
UK PM Burnham's new cabinet to meet as he announces tax cut
-
South Africa's anti-migrant unrest sparks smalltown suspicion, fear
-
Former MotoGP champion Quartararo to make Honda switch
-
Tour de France hit by new wave of anti-doping tests
-
Oleksandr Syrsky, Ukraine's under-fire commander-in-chief
-
Afghans search for dozens missing after devastating flood
-
New UK govt tackles cost of living with energy tax cut
-
Novartis says buoyed by new treatments in second quarter
-
China summons Philippine ambassador over clash in disputed waters
-
Great Barrier Reef at risk of 'collapse', scientists warn
-
Panama, China renew maritime port agreement
-
India's 'Cockroach' movement vows to protest until education minister resigns
-
De Gaulle returns to unite the French -- at the cinema
-
South Korea president urges regulator action on leveraged stock funds
-
North Korea reaffirms support for Moscow over Ukraine
-
For Ukraine's drones, names are part of the battle
-
South China Sea rivalry looms over ASEAN meeting
-
Countries move to ban social media for children
-
Arrogance or pride? Argentina grapples with World Cup villain label
-
Asia stocks up as chip stocks recover, oil eases
-
Fires in Brazil's Amazon dropped to historic low in 2025
-
Desperate Rohingya risk deadly voyages as trafficking surges
-
French youth social media ban meets age check conundrum
-
French lawmakers expected to approve social media ban for under-15s
-
Lebanon's Aoun to meet Trump as pressure builds to disarm Hezbollah
-
'All these rashes': chickenpox surges in Gaza camps
-
Red Sox stretch streak to 14 after clinging on to beat Orioles 6-5
-
Australia's Cummins, Hazlewood, Lyon back for Bangladesh Test series
-
Wes Streeting named new UK defence minister
-
Rubio in Philippines as US condemns 'dangerous' China actions
-
Inside Indonesia's slave island: 'I want my children to be free'
-
Unnatural physique turns Evenepoel into a Tour de France contender
-
Thousands welcome home Argentina squad, without Messi, despite World Cup loss
-
'Sit down!' Australian politician berates dog on live TV
-
CHAR Tech Welcomes France's Regulatory Advance Opening Biogas Certificate Support to Pyrolysis
-
Trump orders new 50% tariff on many Canadian goods
-
Argentina squad returns, without Messi, after World Cup final loss
-
US accuses Cuba of sweeping spy campaign, aiding American left
Trump orders new 50% tariff on many Canadian goods
US President Donald Trump signed orders Monday to impose new 50-percent tariffs on many Canadian goods, claiming "discriminatory treatment" by Ottawa against American alcohol, automobile and dairy products.
The tariffs will take effect in 30 days and cover a range of items including wine, hockey sticks and cement, according to a White House fact sheet.
Trump, who saw many of his tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court earlier this year, tapped an untested legal provision for the new duties -- Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The latest duties will not apply to energy, potash and goods already impacted by sector-specific tariffs, the White House said.
Crucially, however, they will hit products covered under the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA).
While Trump has slapped sweeping duties on US trading partners since returning to the presidency last year, the orders have generally exempted goods entering his country under the North American free trade pact.
His latest actions threaten to further strain ties between Washington and Ottawa, and come just days after he threatened Canada with increased tariffs over wildfire smoke that drifted into the United States.
The White House, in announcing the new tariffs, said Canada was one of only two countries -- along with China -- to retaliate against Trump's sweeping tariffs last year.
It also took aim at the fact that most Canadian provinces have halted purchases of US alcohol, boycotting the products over Trump's tariff threats and repeated calls for annexation of Canada as America's "51st state."
"Canada has taken US alcohol products off Canadian shelves, given better market access to dairy products from the European Union, and has put a cap on US vehicle exports to Canada from companies reshoring to the United States," charged US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in a statement.
The tariff announcement aims to "hold Canada accountable for its retaliation and discrimination," he added.
- 'Litigation risk' -
Trump's move marks the first time that Section 338 has been used to impose tariffs, Scott Lincicome of the libertarian Cato Institute told AFP.
Many experts believe that the law has been superceded by other authorities, he said, arguing that Trump has "demonstrated a willingness to use and abuse any statute on the books."
Ryan Majerus, a former US trade official, told AFP that the law is "subject to a lot of litigation risk" and has never been tested.
"This is clearly designed to get some leverage over Canada," added Majerus, who is now a partner at law firm King & Spalding.
He noted that negotiations surrounding the USMCA were ongoing, and that the United States' talks with Mexico have proceeded at a much faster pace than those with Canada.
"This could be an effort to try to get them going," he said, pointing to the 30-day delay in the tariffs' implementation.
If the tariffs were to take effect as announced, however, Majerus expects that the removal of exemptions for USMCA imports would be highly negative to US supply chains and businesses.
X.Matos--PC