-
Manchester United rallies past Roma as PSG dominates in Champions League
-
Qatar prime minister advances mediation through diplomatic calls
-
Qatar sees tentative opening for renewed regional diplomacy
-
Greenland parliament approves security agreement with United States
-
Qatar Tourism joins Pacific Asia Travel Association at London travel market
-
Qatar envoy meets incoming UN General Assembly president
-
Abdul El-Sayed Wins Michigan Senate Seat in Historic Election
-
Trump Signals Willingness to Work With Democrats After Midterm Defeat
-
Qatar media bodies discuss support for humanitarian initiatives
-
Galloway accuser could not foresee publishing-sector fallout, lawyer argues
-
No. 22 UCLA defeats No. 5 Arizona 84-75 despite Kharchenkov's 38 points
-
New York City Center revives In the Heights as a timely community story
-
Vessel operator seeks witnesses after Vancouver grounding
-
Godzilla Minus Zero shifts focus toward postwar human drama
-
US Air Force deploys F-16 fighters to remote Aleutian base for readiness drill
-
Mehbooba Mufti urges dialogue and renewed Central Asia links for Kashmir
-
Bezos grant helps Seattle nonprofit move thousands of families toward housing
-
Seacliff Healthcare Seeks Specialist GP in Thirroul
-
Shrini Srivastava joins crew of Varanasi-Delhi Vande Bharat Sleeper service
-
US stocks fall before midterm Election Day as technology shares weaken
-
Nearly Half of Australian Workers Overqualified, Survey Finds
-
BLS Polymers makes strong market debut at ₹248 per share
Can we shut down AI?
The debate over potential dangers posed by artificial intelligence has resurged in recent weeks, with researchers once again warning the technology could end humanity, and leaders of AI companies suggesting development needed to be slowed.
One of the co-founders of AI firm Anthropic told the BBC this week he believed kill switches may need to be made mandatory for AI.
But if an AI system goes rogue, is it even possible to shut it down?
- Is there a 'kill switch'? -
"From an AI cybersecurity perspective, the term 'kill switch' refers to the ability to interrupt the execution of an AI agent's action," Nicolas Papernot, a professor at the University of Toronto and a specialist in computer security and artificial intelligence, told AFP.
The person or organisation that deployed the AI agent -- an industry term for a bot that has the potential to operate autonomously -- can stop it by denying it access to the computing power it needs to run, Papernot said.
The situation becomes more complicated if the program has been allowed to act beyond its initial environment.
Papernot envisaged a scenario where AI could be used to spread a computer worm -- a type of self-replicating malware.
"In that case, we would have to simultaneously interrupt the action of all copies the worm made of itself -- device by device by device," he said.
- Can we really switch off an AI? -
Thierry Poibeau, an AI expert at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), said the image of a single button that would let us "switch off AI" is misleading.
"You can't really just cut off AI like that," he said.
"There are an enormous number of companies around the world, and all sorts of different software and services. There's no single person who controls AI as a whole."
But it is possible to shut down a specific system when you control the machines and services it depends on.
Hussein Abbass, a computer science professor at the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Canberra, wrote on LinkedIn that AI systems could be divided into three levels of complexity.
In the first, a centralised AI system entirely under the control of its operator, an emergency shutdown mechanism would be "theoretically and practically possible".
But in his other two "decentralised" scenarios, where AI programs have been given permissions to act on other software, files, machines or even systems, it would be much more difficult to stop everything.
- What are the risks of a kill switch? -
The more AI is integrated into everyday activities, the greater the risk that shutting it down will also paralyse legitimate uses.
Papernot said: "As AI is increasingly embedded in all of our institutions and businesses, and as we automate more and more aspects of daily life using AI, it will be harder to use compute power as a kill switch -- because that will mean all of those other legitimate functions will also grind to a stop."
Stopping an AI system could degrade services that businesses, public administrations, or healthcare institutions already depend on.
The costs and drawbacks of such a move would be "enormous", Papernot added.
And some leading public figures have warned against scaremongering about AI.
US President Donald Trump has dismissed existential fears about AI as a hoax, while Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has argued against calls to slow AI development, saying market incentives and legal liability are the best safeguards.
For Jean-Gabriel Ganascia, professor of computer science at Sorbonne University, the debate on the "kill switch" can feed into the idea misleading idea that AI's greatest risk is it developing a will of its own.
Instead, he said, the more concrete risk lies in our growing dependence on such systems.
L.E.Campos--PC