-
After pope's remark, White House defends praying for US troops
-
Powell probe leaves US Fed leadership change in limbo
-
Celine Dion announces comeback following health struggle
-
'Is it Kafka?' US judge baffled by new Pentagon press policy
-
Cubans ready for Russian oil but some say not enough
-
Teen Suryavanshi shines as Rajasthan hammer Chennai in IPL
-
Stock market winners and losers one month into US-Israel war on Iran
-
Hodgson says surprise return to management is only for short-term
-
What could Trump achieve by threatening Iran's Kharg Island?
-
India declares victory over Maoist insurgency
-
Germany's Merz pushes return of Syrians as he hosts leader Sharaa
-
G7 ministers pledge 'necessary measures' to ensure stable energy market
-
Cardiff City lose compensation case over Emiliano Sala death
-
Several French far-right mayors take down EU flags
-
Air Canada CEO to retire after row over English-only condolence message
-
Oil rises on Trump's Iran threats, stocks take cue on talks
-
Syrian leader pledges to work with Germany on migration, recovery
-
AI agent future is coming, OpenClaw creator tells AFP
-
Cardiff lose 122 mn euro compensation case over Emiliano Sala death
-
Tuchel defends Rice and Saka after England withdrawals
-
G7 ministers tackle economic fallout of Mideast war
-
Tottenham close in on De Zerbi as next boss - reports
-
Kenya's former NY marathon champion Korir gets 5-year doping ban
-
Lukaku says 'could never turn back on Napoli' after treatment row
-
Syrian leader visits Germany to talk war, recovery, refugees
-
Renault says developing ground-based military drone
-
Iran hangs two 'political prisoners' from banned opposition: activists
-
Russia expels UK diplomat on spying allegations
-
Premier League fans back call to scrap VAR
-
Italy hoping to scale World Cup 'Everest' ahead of Bosnia play-off showdown
-
Japan's cherry blossom season dazzles locals and tourists
-
EU ups mackerel quotas to match UK despite overfishing concerns
-
Crude rises, stocks drop as Houthi attacks escalate Iran war
-
Australian Rules player banned for wiping blood on face of opponent
-
Sheep culls put pressure on Greek feta cheese production
-
One man, his dog, and ChatGPT: Australia's AI vaccine saga
-
Israel PM restores access after Latin Patriarch blocked from Holy Sepulchre
-
Israel strikes Tehran as Trump says Iran deal may be reached 'soon'
-
Italy chase World Cup spot as Kosovo bid to make debut
-
Myanmar paves way for junta chief to become civilian president
-
'Long live the shah': Iranian diaspora back war at Washington rally
-
Taiwan opposition leader accepts Xi's invitation to visit China
-
French masonic lodge at heart of murky murder trial
-
US military building 'massive complex' beneath White House ballroom project: Trump
-
IPL captain takes pop at Cricket Australia over record-buy Green
-
G7 ministers set to tackle financial fallout of Mideast war
-
Premier League fans feel the pinch from ticket price hikes
-
Australia to halve fuel tax in response to Middle East war
-
Crude surges, stocks dive as Houthi attacks escalate Iran war
-
Air China resumes flights to North Korea after 6-year pause
Google to delete incognito search data to end privacy suit
Google has agreed to delete a vast trove of search data to settle a suit that it tracked millions of US users who thought they were browsing the internet privately.
If a proposed settlement filed Monday in San Francisco federal court is approved by a judge, Google must "delete and/or remediate billions of data records" linked to people using the Chrome browser's incognito mode, according to court documents.
"This settlement is an historic step in requiring dominant technology companies to be honest in their representations to users about how the companies collect and employ user data, and to delete and remediate data collected," lawyer David Boies said in the filing.
A hearing is slated for July 30 before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who is to decide whether to approve the deal that would let Google avoid a trial in the class-action suit.
The settlement calls for no cash damages to be paid but leaves an option for Chrome users who feel they were wronged to sue Google separately to get money.
The suit originally filed in June of 2020 sought at least $5 billion in damages.
"We are pleased to settle this lawsuit, which we always believed was meritless," Google spokesman Jorge Castaneda said in a statement.
"We are happy to delete old technical data that was never associated with an individual and was never used for any form of personalization."
The object of the lawsuit was the "Incognito Mode" in the Chrome browser that plaintiffs said gave users a false sense that what they were surfing online was not being tracked by the Silicon Valley tech firm.
But internal Google emails brought forward in the lawsuit demonstrated that users using incognito mode were being followed by the search and advertising behemoth for measuring web traffic and selling ads.
The lawsuit, filed in a California court, claimed Google's practices had infringed on users' privacy by intentionally deceiving them with the incognito option.
The original complaint alleged that Google had been given the "power to learn intimate details about individuals' lives, interests, and internet usage."
"Google has made itself an unaccountable trove of information so detailed and expansive that George Orwell could never have dreamed it," it added.
The settlement requires Google, for the next five years, to block third-party tracking "cookies" by default in Incognito Mode.
Third-party cookies are small files which are used to target advertising by tracking web navigation and are placed by visited sites and not by the browser itself.
- No cookies? -
Google earlier this year began limiting third-party cookies for some users of its Chrome browser, a first step towards eventually abandoning the files that have raised privacy concerns.
Google announced in January 2020 that it would begin eliminating third-party cookies within two years, but the start has been delayed several times amid opposition from web media publishers.
Cookies have recently been subject to greater regulation, including the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation introduced in 2016 as well as regulations in California.
A.Motta--PC