-
Grattan Institute Releases Blueprint to Target Specialists Over Excessive Fees
-
The Dilemma of Recording Live Music: Preserving Memories vs. Being Present
-
Arizona Science Center Hosts Girls in STEM Astro Adventures for Students
-
ANC’s Renewal Rhetoric Fades as Voters Reject Party in 2026 Local Elections
-
New Turkish Cafe, Japanese BBQ, and Korean Restaurants Open Across East Bay
-
Foreign Investors Return to Indian Markets After 10-Month Selloff
-
Knowle Move Four Points Clear at Top After Histon Victory
-
Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 Lead Canada’s Most Stolen Vehicles List for 2025
-
Physicians Urge Arizona to Ban Medical Gag Clauses and Enable Private Lawsuits
-
China Extends Tariff Suspension on US Imports to Stabilize Trade Ties
-
New Campaign Highlights Knowledge Gaps on Carbon Monoxide Safety Among Americans
-
JR East Launches 'teppay' to Integrate Suica Balance with Mobile Payments
ChatGPT bot passes US law school exam
A chatbot powered by reams of data from the internet has passed exams at a US law school after writing essays on topics ranging from constitutional law to taxation and torts.
ChatGPT from OpenAI, a US company that this week got a massive injection of cash from Microsoft, uses artificial intelligence (AI) to generate streams of text from simple prompts.
The results have been so good that educators have warned it could lead to widespread cheating and even signal the end of traditional classroom teaching methods.
Jonathan Choi, a professor at Minnesota University Law School, gave ChatGPT the same test faced by students, consisting of 95 multiple-choice questions and 12 essay questions.
In a white paper titled "ChatGPT goes to law school" published on Monday, he and his coauthors reported that the bot scored a C+ overall.
While this was enough for a pass, the bot was near the bottom of the class in most subjects and "bombed" at multiple-choice questions involving mathematics.
- 'Not a great student' -
"In writing essays, ChatGPT displayed a strong grasp of basic legal rules and had consistently solid organization and composition," the authors wrote.
But the bot "often struggled to spot issues when given an open-ended prompt, a core skill on law school exams".
Officials in New York and other jurisdictions have banned the use of ChatGPT in schools, but Choi suggested it could be a valuable teaching aide.
"Overall, ChatGPT wasn't a great law student acting alone," he wrote on Twitter.
"But we expect that collaborating with humans, language models like ChatGPT would be very useful to law students taking exams and to practicing lawyers."
And playing down the possibility of cheating, he wrote in reply to another Twitter user that two out of three markers had spotted the bot-written paper.
"(They) had a hunch and their hunch was right, because ChatGPT had perfect grammar and was somewhat repetitive," Choi wrote.
G.M.Castelo--PC