-
Search Underway for 'Dooars Rani' Tigress After Second Escape from Buxa Tiger Reserve
-
Best Pet Advent Calendars for Christmas 2026: Dog Treats and Cat Toys
-
IIM Indore Announces IPMAT 2027 Exam Date for April 24
-
Grattan Institute Releases Blueprint to Target Specialists Over Excessive Fees
-
The Dilemma of Recording Live Music: Preserving Memories vs. Being Present
-
Arizona Science Center Hosts Girls in STEM Astro Adventures for Students
-
ANC’s Renewal Rhetoric Fades as Voters Reject Party in 2026 Local Elections
-
New Turkish Cafe, Japanese BBQ, and Korean Restaurants Open Across East Bay
-
Foreign Investors Return to Indian Markets After 10-Month Selloff
-
Knowle Move Four Points Clear at Top After Histon Victory
-
Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 Lead Canada’s Most Stolen Vehicles List for 2025
-
Physicians Urge Arizona to Ban Medical Gag Clauses and Enable Private Lawsuits
-
China Extends Tariff Suspension on US Imports to Stabilize Trade Ties
Pigs notch animal cruelty win at US Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a California animal cruelty law that bans the sale in America's most-populous state of pork from pigs raised in confined conditions.
Justice Neil Gorsuch, in the 5-4 majority opinion, said "companies that choose to sell products in various states must normally comply with the laws of those various states."
Pork producers who brought the legal challenge against the California law were asking the nation's highest court to impose "constitutional restrictions on the ability of states to regulate goods sold within their borders," Gorsuch said.
"We decline that invitation," he said. "While the Constitution addresses many weighty issues, the type of pork chops California merchants may sell is not on that list."
Californians passed an animal welfare measure, Proposition 12, in a referendum in 2018 that bans the sale of pork from pigs raised in overly confined pens.
The pork industry went to court accusing California -- which produces little of the pork it consumes -- of restricting interstate commerce and claiming that the state's animal welfare standards would raise ham and bacon prices for consumers.
After being rejected by state courts, the pork producers turned to the Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case in October.
F.Cardoso--PC