-
'Best day of my life': Raimund soars to German Olympic ski jump gold
-
US Justice Dept opens unredacted Epstein files to lawmakers
-
Epstein taints European governments and royalty, US corporate elite
-
Three missing employees of Canadian miner found dead in Mexico
-
Meta, Google face jury in landmark US addiction trial
-
Winter Olympics organisers investigate reports of damaged medals
-
Venezuela opposition figure freed, then rearrested after calling for elections
-
Japan's Murase clinches Olympic big air gold as Gasser is toppled
-
US athletes using Winter Olympics to express Trump criticism
-
Japan's Murase clinches Olympic big air gold
-
Pakistan to play India at T20 World Cup after boycott called off
-
Emergency measures hobble Cuba as fuel supplies dwindle under US pressure
-
UK king voices 'concern' as police probe ex-prince Andrew over Epstein
-
Spanish NGO says govt flouting own Franco memory law
-
What next for Vonn after painful end to Olympic dream?
-
Main trial begins in landmark US addiction case against Meta, YouTube
-
South Africa open T20 World Cup campaign with Canada thrashing
-
Epstein accomplice Maxwell seeks Trump clemency before testimony
-
Discord adopts facial recognition in child safety crackdown
-
Some striking NY nurses reach deal with employers
-
Emergency measures kick in as Cuban fuel supplies dwindle under US pressure
-
EU chief backs Made-in-Europe push for 'strategic' sectors
-
Machado ally 'kidnapped' after calling for Venezuela elections
-
Epstein affair triggers crisis of trust in Norway
-
AI chatbots give bad health advice, research finds
-
Iran steps up arrests while remaining positive on US talks
-
Frank issues rallying cry for 'desperate' Tottenham
-
South Africa pile up 213-4 against Canada in T20 World Cup
-
Brazil seeks to restore block of Rumble video app
-
Gu's hopes of Olympic triple gold dashed, Vonn still in hospital
-
Pressure mounts on UK's Starmer as Scottish Labour leader urges him to quit
-
Macron backs ripping up vines as French wine sales dive
-
Olympic freeski star Eileen Gu 'carrying weight of two countries'
-
Bank of France governor Francois Villeroy de Galhau to step down in June
-
Tokyo stocks strike record high after Japanese premier wins vote
-
'I need to improve', says Haaland after barren spell
-
Italian suspect questioned over Sarajevo 'weekend snipers' killings: reports
-
Von Allmen at the double as Nef seals Olympic team combined gold
-
Newlyweds, but rivals, as Olympic duo pursue skeleton dreams
-
Carrick sees 'a lot more to do' to earn Man Utd job
-
Olympic star Chloe Kim calls for 'compassion' after Trump attack on US teammate
-
'All the pressure' on Pakistan as USA out to inflict another T20 shock
-
Starmer vows to remain as UK PM amid Epstein fallout
-
Howe would 'step aside' if right for Newcastle
-
Sakamoto wants 'no regrets' as gold beckons in Olympic finale
-
What next for Vonn after painful end of Olympic dream?
-
Brain training reduces dementia risk by 25%, study finds
-
Gremaud ends Gu's hopes of Olympic treble in freeski slopestyle
-
Shiffrin and Johnson paired in Winter Olympics team combined
-
UK's Starmer scrambles to limit Epstein fallout as aides quit
ICJ sides with E.Guinea in spat with Gabon over oil-rich islands
The top United Nations court on Monday sided with Equatorial Guinea in a decades-long dispute with Gabon over three tiny islands in potentially oil-rich waters.
The two west African nations have been squabbling over the 30-hectare (74-acre) island of Mbanie and two smaller low-lying islets, Cocotiers and Conga, since the early 1970s.
The islands themselves are tiny and virtually uninhabited but lie in an area potentially rich in oil and gas.
The dispute dates all the way back to 1900, when then colonial powers France and Spain signed a treaty in Paris setting out the borders between the two countries.
But Gabon argued that a later treaty, the 1974 Bata Convention, then fixed the islands' sovereignty in their favour.
However, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Bata Convention "invoked by the Gabonese Republic is not a treaty having the force of law... and does not constitute a legal title."
It said that the legal title to the islands was held by Spain, which then passed to Equatorial Guinea upon independence in 1968.
Unlike most countries appearing before the ICJ in The Hague, which rules in disputes between states, Guinea and Equatorial Guinea agreed to ask judges for a ruling in an effort to find an amical solution.
The two countries asked the court to decide which legal texts are valid -- the Paris Treaty of 1900 or the Bata Convention of 1974.
In hearings in October, Equatorial Guinea argued that Gabon invaded the islands in 1972 and had occupied them illegally ever since.
Lawyers for the country rubbished the Bata Convention in the October hearings, saying Gabon suddenly produced the document in 2003, surprising everyone.
"No one had seen or heard of this supposed convention," Domingo Mba Esono, Vice-Minister of Mines and Hydrocarbons from Equatorial Guinea, told ICJ judges.
"Moreover, the document presented was not an original but was only an unauthenticated photocopy," said Esono.
Philippe Sands, a lawyer representing Equatorial Guinea, dismissed the Bata Convention as "scraps of paper".
"You are being asked to rule that a state can rely on a photocopy of a photocopy of a purported document, the original of which cannot be found and of which no mention was made or any reliance placed for three decades," said Sands.
Equatorial Guinea has been asking for an original copy of the Bata Convention since 2003, so far in vain.
- 'Badly managed' -
But Marie-Madeleine Mborantsuo, honorary president of Gabon's constitutional court, argued that the Bata Convention "resolves all sovereignty issues regarding the islands and border delimitation".
She admitted that "sadly, neither of the two parties can find the original document", noting it was drawn up in an era before computers and databases.
"Archives were badly managed because of a number of things -- unfavourable climate, a lack of trained personnel and lack of technology," said Mborantsuo.
The court ruled that neither country seemed to regard the Bata Convention as binding upon them, meaning the court did not consider it the correct title in force.
G.M.Castelo--PC