-
Trans community alarmed as India moves to curb LGBTQ rights
-
Families' nightmare fight for justice in Austria child sex cases
-
Tiger Woods to return to action in TGL with Masters looming
-
Australia, EU agree sweeping new trade pact eight years in the works
-
Back to black: facing energy shock, Asia turns to coal
-
Iran fires new wave of missiles at Israel after denying Trump talks
-
Manila's jeepney drivers struggle as Mideast war sends diesel cost soaring
-
The contenders vying to be next Danish leader
-
India's historic haveli homes caught between revival and ruin
-
Denmark votes in close election, outgoing PM tipped to win
-
N. Korea's Kim vows 'irreversible' nuclear status, warns Seoul of 'merciless' response
-
Pressure on Italy as play-off hopefuls eye 2026 World Cup
-
Malinin and Sakamoto seek solace at figure skating worlds as Olympic champions absent
-
'Perfect Japan' posts spark Gen Z social media backlash
-
Asian stocks rise on Trump U-turn but unease sees oil bounce
-
Pistons halt Lakers streak while Spurs, Thunder win
-
Silence not an option, says Canadian Sikh activist after fresh threats
-
Rennie shakes up All Blacks backroom team as 2027 World Cup looms
-
Australia, EU agree to sweeping new trade pact after eight years
-
Too old? The 92-year-old US judge handling Maduro case
-
Australia, EU agree sweeping new trade pact
-
Sinner, Sabalenka march on in Miami as more seeds crash out
-
US social media addiction trial jury struggles for consensus
-
EU 'concerned' by reports Hungary leaked information to Russia
-
EU chief meets Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Israel pounds south Beirut, says captured Hezbollah members
-
EU chief to meet Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Champion Mensik, Medvedev dumped out of Miami Open
-
Jury at US social media addiction trial reports 'difficulty' in finding consensus
-
Stokes eager to lead England recovery after 'hardest period of captaincy'
-
Venezuela protesters demand end to 'hunger' level wages
-
Eight people arrested in Brazil for 'brutal' attack on capybara
-
Audi Q9 – how likely is it to become a reality?
-
Oil slides, stocks rebound on Trump's Iran remarks
-
On Iran, Trump executes his most spectacular U-turn yet
-
Trump announces 'very good' Iran talks denied by Tehran
-
Bill Cosby ordered to pay $19m over sex abuse claim
-
Dodgers eye 'threepeat' as new MLB season welcomes robot umpires
-
Dacia Striker: Stylish and sturdy?
-
Skoda Peaq: New all-electric seven-seater
-
Medvedev ousted by Cerundolo at Miami Open
-
Runway collision kills two pilots at New York airport
-
Bosnian truckers blocked EU freight terminals for a day over visa rules
-
Colombia military aircraft crashes with 125 aboard, many feared dead
-
Rip-offs at the petrol pump?
-
Shakira to wrap up world tour with Madrid residency
-
World gave Israel 'licence to torture Palestinians': UN expert
-
Colombia says 80 troops on crashed aircraft, many feared dead
-
France turns to 2027 race to succeed Macron
-
New Mercedes GLC electric
US Supreme Court to hear pivotal minority voting rights case
The US Supreme Court hears a case involving Black voters on Wednesday that could have lasting repercussions on whether Democrats or Republicans control the House of Representatives.
The case touching on the thorny issues of race and politics is a challenge to a congressional map adopted by the Louisiana state legislature creating a second Black majority district.
The conservative-dominated top court actually heard the case last term, but in an unusual move it decided not to issue a ruling and scheduled it for re-argument during the current session.
African-Americans tend to overwhelmingly vote Democratic and they make up one-third of the population of Louisiana, which has six congressional districts.
Following the 2020 census, Louisiana created a new congressional map that included only one Black majority district instead of the previous two.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and others filed suit claiming the new map diluted Black voting power and violated the Voting Rights Act, which was passed during the civil rights movement in 1965 to remedy historic racial discrimination.
The Louisiana legislature released a new map last year with two Black majority districts that was met with the legal challenge from a group of "non African-American" voters. It has now reached the Supreme Court, where conservatives hold a 6-3 majority.
The opponents of the redrawn map argue that using race to design congressional districts is racial gerrymandering prohibited by the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution.
"The stakes are incredibly high," said ACLU attorney Sophia Lin Lakin. "The outcome will not only determine the next steps for Louisiana's congressional map, but may also shape the future of redistricting cases nationwide."
Republicans currently hold a slim majority in the House and an increase or decrease in the number of Black majority districts could help tip the balance in the November 2026 midterm elections, when all 435 seats in the chamber will be up for grabs.
- 'One-party control' -
According to a report by two voting advocacy groups, Fair Fight Action and Black Voters Matter, a Supreme Court ruling striking down Voting Rights Act protections for minorities could lead to Republicans picking up an additional 19 seats in the House.
"It's enough to cement one-party control of the US House for at least a generation," they said.
The Louisiana voting case is being heard against a backdrop of redistricting moves in both Republican- and Democratic-ruled states.
Republican-led Texas is drawing new congressional district maps that are expected to flip up to five House seats from Democrats to Republicans.
Several mainly Latino or Black districts which Republican Donald Trump lost in the 2024 election in Texas were broken up to dilute support for Democrats.
Democratic leaders in California responded with a redistricting push to offset potential Republican gains in Texas, though it will first be put to a state-wide referendum.
S.Caetano--PC