-
ECB holds interest rates as strong euro causes jitters
-
EU close to sealing trade deal with Australia
-
German Cup final to stay in Berlin until 2030
-
What does Iran want from talks with the US?
-
Taming the lion: Olympians take on Bormio's terrifying Stelvio piste
-
Wind turbine maker Vestas sees record revenue in 2025
-
Italy's Casse tops second Olympic downhill training
-
Anti-doping boss 'uncomfortable' with Valieva's coach at Olympics
-
Bitcoin under $70,000 for first time since Trump's election
-
'I am sorry,' embattled UK PM tells Epstein victims
-
England's Brook predicts record 300-plus scores at T20 World Cup
-
Ukraine, Russia swap prisoners, US says 'work remains' to end war
-
Wales' Rees-Zammit at full-back for Six Nations return against England
-
Sad horses and Draco Malfoy: China's unexpected Lunar New Year trends
-
Hong Kong students dissolve pro-democracy group under 'severe' pressure
-
Germany claws back 59 mn euros from Amazon over price controls
-
Germany claws back 70 mn euros from Amazon over price controls
-
VW and Stellantis urge help to keep carmaking in Europe
-
Stock markets drop amid tech concerns before rate calls
-
BBVA posts record profit after failed Sabadell takeover
-
UN human rights agency in 'survival mode': chief
-
Greenpeace slams fossil fuel sponsors for Winter Olympics
-
Greenpeace slams fossel fuel sponsors for Winter Olympics
-
Kinghorn, Van der Merwe dropped by Scotland for Six Nations opener
-
Russia says thwarted smuggling of giant meteorite to UK
-
Salt war heats up in ice-glazed Berlin
-
Liverpool in 'good place' for years to come, says Slot
-
Heathrow still Europe's busiest airport, but Istanbul gaining fast
-
Highest storm alert lifted in Spain, one woman missing
-
Shell profits climb despite falling oil prices
-
Pakistan will seek govt nod in potential India T20 finals clash
-
German factory orders rise at fastest rate in 2 years in December
-
Nigeria president deploys army after new massacre
-
Ukraine, Russia, US start second day of war talks
-
Nepal's youth lead the charge in the upcoming election
-
Sony hikes forecasts even as PlayStation falters
-
Rijksmuseum puts the spotlight on Roman poet's epic
-
Trump fuels EU push to cut cord with US tech
-
Fearless talent: Five young players to watch at the T20 World Cup
-
India favourites as T20 World Cup to begin after chaotic build-up
-
Voter swings raise midterm alarm bells for Trump's Republicans
-
Australia dodges call for arrest of visiting Israel president
-
Countries using internet blackouts to boost censorship: Proton
-
Top US news anchor pleads with kidnappers for mom's life
-
Thailand's pilot PM on course to keep top job
-
The coming end of ISS, symbol of an era of global cooperation
-
New crew set to launch for ISS after medical evacuation
-
Family affair: Thailand waning dynasty still election kingmaker
-
Japan's first woman PM tipped for thumping election win
-
Stocks in retreat as traders reconsider tech investment
UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance
Apple lost a UK lawsuit Thursday which accuses the US tech giant of abusing the dominant position of its App Store, with claimants seeking more than £1.5 billion ($2 billion) in damages.
The Competition Appeal Tribunal found that Apple shut out competition in the app distribution market and charged app developers "excessive and unfair" commissions.
Apple said it "strongly disagrees" with the ruling and intends to appeal.
The case was brought by King's College London academic Rachael Kent and the law firm Hausfeld & Co on behalf of millions of UK iPhone and iPad users.
Under UK law, in this type of class action, all potentially affected persons are included in the procedure by default, and may benefit from possible compensation, unless they voluntarily opt out.
In the trial, which opened in January, claimants argued that Apple users were overcharged by the company "due to its ban on rival app store platforms."
They said a 30-percent surcharge that the company "imposes" on apps purchased through Apple's App Store leads to consumers "paying more."
At the heart of the claimants' case was that Apple used the App Store to exclude competitors, forcing users to use its system and boosting profits in the process.
Apple, which had denounced the trial as "baseless", maintained that its App Store "faces vigorous competition from many other platforms."
J.V.Jacinto--PC