-
Somali referee denied World Cup 'proud' to oversee UEFA Super Cup
-
Oil prices jump as US-Iran deal hopes falter
-
French newspapers target Google over AI summaries
-
Newly crowned world's best pastry chef stays true to artisan roots
-
Ebola death toll in DR Congo outbreak rises to more than 2,000
-
Johnson signs for Everton in McNeil swap deal
-
PrimeXBT Launches MT5 Cent Account for Beginners and Risk-Conscious Traders
-
Syria sentences Bashar al-Assad to death in absentia over atrocities
-
British sprinter Hunt chasing three more golds after winning 100m
-
Hong Kong's tech index plans expansion with AI and robotics themes
-
Ethiopia's Tigray rebel authorities condemn army drone strikes
-
The Infantino saga -- What they said
-
Too hot to live? French buyers rethink housing choices after heatwaves
-
Economic losses from natural disasters fall to $100 bn in first half of 2026: Swiss Re
-
Ukraine says Russia fired N. Korean missiles in deadly attack
-
Colombia scrambles to find survivors as quake kills 132
-
Oil prices jump further as hopes for Hormuz deal fade
-
Singapore says AI-related demand lifting economy
-
Trump says would be 'terrible mistake' to oust embattled Infantino
-
Demeter Tactical Investments (ME) Limited bolsters governance with two board appointments
-
Charity races to raise millions to buy historic English estate
-
Russian barrage on Ukraine kills 9, wounds dozens
-
Hungary parliament to elect Orban-critic judge as president
-
Schools closed as Indonesia battles wildfires
-
Wallabies lock Amatosero given three-match ban for Japan red card
-
Swiatek dominates Shnaider to set up Toronto semi with Svitolina
-
Swiatek races into Toronto semis as Svitolina battles through
-
Oil prices rise further as hopes for Hormuz deal fade
-
'Big Four' bowlers back as ageing Australia begin gruelling run
-
One year after Putin-Trump summit, 'spirit of Anchorage' dissipated
-
AI's hunger for power sparks US private gas plant boom
-
Farage vs Count Binface: What to know about UK snap poll
-
Memphis AI data center fuels pollution fight in Black neighborhood
-
Torment of Afghan fathers as daughters deprived of education
-
Ceuta leader wants migrant detention centre after influx
-
Return of displaced Syrian Kurds to hometown suspended after violence
-
Colombia scrambles to find survivors as quake kills 111
-
Swiatek races past Shnaider into Toronto semi-finals
-
Rain postponements wreck Montreal Masters schedule
-
AI/ML Innovations' Subsidiary NeuralCloud Achieves ISO 13485:2016 (MDSAP) Certification
-
ePropelled to Increase Manufacturing Footprint with $60 Million in U.S. Government Funding to Strengthen U.S. Drone Propulsion Supply Chain
-
RollerAds Launches a Full-Cycle Ad Platform with Traffic, Offers, and Monetization in One Workspace
-
Power to Hydrogen Delivers First-of-a-Kind Industrial-Scale AEM Electrolyzer to the Port of Antwerp-Bruges
-
Meta pushes global AI vision amid race with OpenAI, Anthropic and China
-
Notts Forest owner Marinakis sues Palace over gun banner - reports
-
US judge ends graft case against India's Adani
-
Koech gets three-year ban, stripped of US 1,500m title
-
Anderson retires after 10 MLB seasons after 'too much pain'
-
Sensational Ingebrigtsen back with more European gold
-
Colombia in state of emergency as quake kills 111
UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance
Apple lost a UK lawsuit Thursday which accuses the US tech giant of abusing the dominant position of its App Store, with claimants seeking more than £1.5 billion ($2 billion) in damages.
The Competition Appeal Tribunal found that Apple shut out competition in the app distribution market and charged app developers "excessive and unfair" commissions.
Apple said it "strongly disagrees" with the ruling and intends to appeal.
The case was brought by King's College London academic Rachael Kent and the law firm Hausfeld & Co on behalf of millions of UK iPhone and iPad users.
Under UK law, in this type of class action, all potentially affected persons are included in the procedure by default, and may benefit from possible compensation, unless they voluntarily opt out.
In the trial, which opened in January, claimants argued that Apple users were overcharged by the company "due to its ban on rival app store platforms."
They said a 30-percent surcharge that the company "imposes" on apps purchased through Apple's App Store leads to consumers "paying more."
At the heart of the claimants' case was that Apple used the App Store to exclude competitors, forcing users to use its system and boosting profits in the process.
Apple, which had denounced the trial as "baseless", maintained that its App Store "faces vigorous competition from many other platforms."
J.V.Jacinto--PC