-
Gobena and Jepchirchir power to Sydney Marathon victories
-
Hovland takes solo lead as McIlroy surges at Tour Championship
-
Iceland in suspense after close EU vote
-
Djokovic 'prepared' for US Open bid for history
-
Wallabies hold on for victory in Argentina
-
Atletico down Sevilla to go top of La Liga
-
Juve notch second straight win, Fiorentina's centenary party falls flat
-
US deports right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos
-
Rybakina eases injury fears ahead of US Open
-
Niger junta says it is back in control after soldiers' mutiny
-
Djokovic kicks off latest Grand Slam quest under US Open lights
-
Erasmus calls Rennie barbs over Springbok scrumming 'nonsense'
-
'Sorry' De Zerbi won't panic after Spurs shambles
-
Lawrence's fifty leaves Pakistan facing record chase to level England series
-
UN, Nepal warn of climate threat after deadly floods
-
Netanyahu condemns settler attack in flashpoint West Bank village
-
USTA boss says structure of new player council not yet set
-
Munoz saves Iraola in Liverpool draw, big-spending Spurs lose again
-
Tiny Elversberg stun Leverkusen on Bundesliga debut, Dortmund beat Hamburg
-
Newcastle condemn dismal Spurs to second successive defeat
-
Court orders JIPMER assessment of Durai Dayanidhi before money-laundering trial
-
James Cleverly leaves shadow cabinet to seek London mayoralty
-
Police appeal for footage after life-threatening Stratford assault
-
Baladi Map app turns Lebanon’s local problems into a public record
-
Family searches for Boston engineer missing after Nepal-Tibet floods
-
Thirty-seven Mumbai pilgrims return after Nepal flood disruption
-
Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library leaves global children’s reading legacy
-
Ankle ligament tear ends Neeraj Chopra’s 2026 season
-
BMC rejects negligence claims in three Rajawadi Hospital maternity cases
-
Chinchpoklicha Chintamani begins 2026 arrival procession in Parel
-
Chembur man held over alleged poisoning of woman’s soft drink
-
Cyberabad civic body demolishes 19 unauthorised structures
-
Andhra Pradesh Speaker seeks stronger sports quota and school facilities
-
About 50 Karnataka travellers return from Nepal as 24 remain missing
-
Kolkata police register new FIR against Mamata Banerjee over rally timing
-
French campaign sharpens as far right accuses left over civil disobedience calls
-
India and China have not named two new border meeting sites
-
Three Texas Tech softball players hurt in jet ski collision
-
Five college football games that could shape the 2026 season
-
Editorial questions Letitia James’ record as New York attorney general
-
New finds strengthen case for Bethsaida at Sea of Galilee site
-
Los Angeles triplets weigh 19.3 pounds in unusually heavy birth
-
Felony assaults on older New Yorkers rise sharply, police data show
-
Matt Leinart assesses Arch Manning and the leading names in college football
-
Tamil Nadu goalball team’s national silver highlights need for wider support
-
Tamil Nadu and NUS agree to expand postgraduate and research links
-
Chennai councillors unite across parties to demand ward development funds
-
Tambaram civic groups seek action on eight long-pending issues
-
Rural Tamil Nadu students present 64 technology projects at IIT-M research park
-
In London, son's agonising wait for news of parents missing in Nepal-Tibet floods
TotalEnergies faces ruling in Belgian farmer climate case
A Belgian judge will rule Wednesday in a closely watched case pitting French oil giant TotalEnergies against a farmer seeking compensation for damage to his farm caused by climate change.
Hugues Falys, a farmer from Belgium's western Hainaut region, was backed by environmental groups including Greenpeace in the David-versus-Goliath case they hope could prove a turning point in the climate fight.
Together they took TotalEnergies to court on the grounds the French group is Belgium's leading refiner and distributor of petroleum products, launching the country's first climate case brought against a multinational company.
The plaintiffs argue the firm can be held liable for global warming because of emissions generated when its products are burned -- a claim rejected by TotalEnergies which accuses pressure groups of "instrumentalising the judiciary."
The lawsuit was filed in 2024 before the Tournai business court in western Belgium, and argued over a series of hearings between November and January, with a verdict due at 2:00 pm (1300 GMT) on Wednesday.
"The judges have everything they need to make the right decision," Falys told AFP.
"But it won't be black and white, given the number of issues to be decided," added the farmer, who also serves as spokesman for an agricultural union.
Contacted by AFP, TotalEnergies declined to comment ahead of the ruling.
Falys is seeking 130,000 euros ($150,000) in damages for four extreme weather events that struck his farm between 2016 and 2020.
First a storm destroyed his strawberry and potato crops, then three periods of drought hurt fodder production, affecting cattle in turn.
But the farmer and his backers are also seeking much broader action from TotalEnergies on countering climate change -- notably for it to stop investing in new fossil-fuel projects.
- Frequent target -
The goals of the lawsuit are "reparation and transformation", said Belgium's human rights league (LDH), which is backing the complaint alongside Greenpeace and food‑rights organisation FIAN.
Making its case in court, the company called it "absurd" to single out a particular firm over the pace of the energy transition -- arguing that it accounts for less than two percent of the oil and gas sector.
"It's a bit easy to blame energy producers for pollution and warming," argued company lawyer Francoise Labrousse back in December, stressing the overarching role of governments in steering climate policy.
"TotalEnergies doesn't sell tractors, cars or boilers," Labrousse argued, describing the group's strategy to meet the EU's goal of carbon neutrality by 2050 as "ambitious and effective".
TotalEnergies is a frequent target of climate and human rights activists, along with other oil giants.
In 2021, Dutch courts issued a landmark ruling ordering Anglo‑Dutch giant Shell to cut its net carbon emissions, finding they contributed to global warming and its harmful effects.
But the judgement was overturned three years later, when an appeals court found that an NGO and individual citizens could not make such demands.
The case, known as "People vs. Shell", is now before the Dutch Supreme Court.
C.Cassis--PC