-
Supporters' group file lawsuit against 'excessive' World Cup ticket prices
-
Gas shortages push India's poor back to wood and coal
-
'Plundered': Senegal fishers feel sting of illegal, industrial vessels
-
Iran hits Israel with missiles after denying Trump talks
-
Stocks rise on Trump U-turn but unease sees oil bounce
-
Trans community alarmed as India moves to curb LGBTQ rights
-
Families' nightmare fight for justice in Austria child sex cases
-
Tiger Woods to return to action in TGL with Masters looming
-
Australia, EU agree sweeping new trade pact eight years in the works
-
Back to black: facing energy shock, Asia turns to coal
-
Iran fires new wave of missiles at Israel after denying Trump talks
-
Manila's jeepney drivers struggle as Mideast war sends diesel cost soaring
-
The contenders vying to be next Danish leader
-
India's historic haveli homes caught between revival and ruin
-
Denmark votes in close election, outgoing PM tipped to win
-
N. Korea's Kim vows 'irreversible' nuclear status, warns Seoul of 'merciless' response
-
Pressure on Italy as play-off hopefuls eye 2026 World Cup
-
Malinin and Sakamoto seek solace at figure skating worlds as Olympic champions absent
-
'Perfect Japan' posts spark Gen Z social media backlash
-
Asian stocks rise on Trump U-turn but unease sees oil bounce
-
Pistons halt Lakers streak while Spurs, Thunder win
-
Silence not an option, says Canadian Sikh activist after fresh threats
-
Rennie shakes up All Blacks backroom team as 2027 World Cup looms
-
Australia, EU agree to sweeping new trade pact after eight years
-
Too old? The 92-year-old US judge handling Maduro case
-
Australia, EU agree sweeping new trade pact
-
Sinner, Sabalenka march on in Miami as more seeds crash out
-
US social media addiction trial jury struggles for consensus
-
EU 'concerned' by reports Hungary leaked information to Russia
-
IXOPAY and Zip US Introduce Unified Trust Layer Framework to Help Merchants Reduce Risk in Agentic Commerce
-
EU chief meets Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Israel pounds south Beirut, says captured Hezbollah members
-
EU chief to meet Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Champion Mensik, Medvedev dumped out of Miami Open
-
Jury at US social media addiction trial reports 'difficulty' in finding consensus
-
Stokes eager to lead England recovery after 'hardest period of captaincy'
-
Venezuela protesters demand end to 'hunger' level wages
-
Eight people arrested in Brazil for 'brutal' attack on capybara
-
Audi Q9 – how likely is it to become a reality?
-
Oil slides, stocks rebound on Trump's Iran remarks
-
On Iran, Trump executes his most spectacular U-turn yet
-
Trump announces 'very good' Iran talks denied by Tehran
-
Bill Cosby ordered to pay $19m over sex abuse claim
-
Dodgers eye 'threepeat' as new MLB season welcomes robot umpires
-
Dacia Striker: Stylish and sturdy?
-
Skoda Peaq: New all-electric seven-seater
-
Medvedev ousted by Cerundolo at Miami Open
-
Runway collision kills two pilots at New York airport
-
Bosnian truckers blocked EU freight terminals for a day over visa rules
-
Colombia military aircraft crashes with 125 aboard, many feared dead
US Supreme Court deals another blow to abortion providers
The conservative-leaning US Supreme Court dealt another blow on Thursday to opponents of a Texas law that bans most abortions after six weeks of pregnancy.
The court, in a 6-3 decision, rejected a request by abortion providers to have the case sent to a district judge who had previously moved to block the Texas law.
Instead, the case will remain with the conservative 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
The majority did not provide any comment on their decision but the three liberal justices on the nation's highest court penned a scathing dissent.
"Today, for the fourth time, this Court declines to protect pregnant Texans from egregious violations of their constitutional rights," Justice Sonia Sotomayor said.
"This case is a disaster for the rule of law and a grave disservice to women in Texas, who have a right to control their own bodies," Sotomayor said. "I will not stand by silently as a State continues to nullify this constitutional guarantee."
The Texas law, which went into force on September 1, bans abortion after six weeks, when a heartbeat in the womb can be detected but before many women even know they are pregnant.
It is the most restrictive abortion law passed in the United States since the procedure was guaranteed as a constitutional right nearly five decades ago.
Laws severely restricting abortion have been passed in multiple Republican-led states, but have been struck down by the courts for violating Roe v. Wade, which guaranteed a woman's right to an abortion until the fetus is viable outside the womb, typically around 22 to 24 weeks.
Texas Senate Bill 8 (SB8) differs from other efforts in that it attempts to insulate the state from claims of rights violations by giving members of the public the ability to sue doctors who perform abortions -- or anyone who helps facilitate them -- once a heartbeat in the womb is detected.
They can be rewarded with $10,000 for initiating civil suits that land in court, prompting criticism that the state is encouraging people to take the law into their own hands.
Many clinics in Texas -- fearful of potentially ruinous lawsuits -- have closed their doors.
- Mississippi case -
The Supreme Court has declined to rule on the constitutionality of the Texas law but indicated in another abortion case that it may be inclined to overturn Roe v. Wade.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on December 1 about a Mississippi law that would ban most abortions after 15 weeks, and the court's conservative wing -- which includes three justices nominated by Donald Trump -- appeared ready to uphold the law and perhaps even go further and overturn Roe.
The court is to render a decision in the Mississippi case by June.
Public opinion polls have found most Americans believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases.
But a segment of the population, particularly on the religious right, has never accepted the Roe v. Wade ruling and has campaigned to have it overturned.
A.Motta--PC