-
In Manchester, people say City scandal is 'shame for football'
-
Haze pushes Kuala Lumpur, Singapore into world's most polluted cities
-
Stocks lacklustre as inflation data weighs on sentiment
-
Dangote's $16bn Kenya refinery 'new chapter' for Africa
-
Israel-bound plane rerouted, pilots wounded in reported fight
-
Ireland coach Hallgrimsson confirms second Israel game will go ahead
-
Truth commission on Sweden's Sami people seeks redress
-
Swift concert attack plan convict fails to get Disney damages
-
Energy costs spark inflation surges in France, Italy
-
Ocon to leave Haas at end of F1 season
-
South Korea break China hearts to reach Asian Games football final
-
Indonesia razes poolside prison 'villas' where whisky, TVs seized
-
Eala storms into Asian Games semi-finals to thrill adoring fans
-
Japan court rules human voice is protected in TikTok AI case
-
Turkey freezes ex-minister's assets as fund crisis grows
-
French inflation jumps to 3% in September on energy costs
-
What we know about the North Korean POW dispute
-
South Korea score late to reach Asian Games football final
-
Most equities rise after oil price plunge, US data in focus
-
Tom Kim defies jet-lag, Kho cards ace as Asian Games golf begins
-
Polar oceans transformed as warming melts ice habitats: research
-
Thai teen rocker Nene aims to tour, write music... and return to school
-
Lost shark becomes viral star in South Korea
-
Ivory Coast clamps down on harmful illegal gold rush
-
Dangote to launch $16bn refinery in Kenya
-
Nagoya mayor says sorry for Asian Games 'inconveniences'
-
North Korean leader 'extremely obese': Seoul spy agency
-
G20 trade officials meet under shadow of tariffs, overcapacity
-
Yankees and pope-backed White Sox start MLB playoffs with wins
-
India's fat dog vote goes viral
-
Malaysia's ex-PM Mahathir in hospital for observation
-
Asian Games crowds in spotlight as 998 see hosts in 50,000 stadium
-
'No limits': Marathon world record holder Sawe chasing history
-
The eight stadiums for the 2027 Rugby World Cup
-
Countdown begins to biggest-ever Rugby World Cup
-
Thieves swipe drugs under nose of Fiji police, swap with flour
-
Bangladesh women lose ground after quota reform
-
South Korea demands North apologise for DMZ mine blasts
-
Vietnam admits 'differing opinions' on Hanoi development
-
In Nepal's flood zone, teachers mourn students who never returned
-
Stocks temper gains as oil pares heavy losses, US data in focus
-
US Supreme Court lifts limits on third-country deportations
-
New Zealand denies breaching climate commitments to EU
-
Antonelli eager to 're-establish order' as F1 returns to Malaysia
-
Albert becomes youngest US scorer in 4-2 win over Chile
-
Paw-fect candidate: Australia finds new koala rescue dog
-
Pirate island's plunging population shows Greece's demographic decline
-
One third of world population exposed to harmful air pollution: monitor
-
With elections ahead, Latvia's Russian-speakers reject Moscow's help
-
North Korea denies South's claim it was apparently behind DMZ mine blasts
US states prepare for battle over abortion pills
The anti-abortion movement in the United States has set its sights on a new target: doctors sending pills across state lines to help women end unwanted pregnancies.
Since the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn the federal protection of the right to an abortion, states like Texas and Louisiana have adopted tough anti-abortion laws.
Women seeking to end pregnancies, even victims of rape or incest, are now obliged to travel long distances or to seek the delivery of abortion pills from other jurisdictions.
And that measure is now under attack.
Texas and Louisiana are launching a legal case against a doctor in New York, a state which in turn has passed a "shield law" to protect its physicians from outside prosecutions.
"These are the first kind of cross-border fights that we've seen since Roe was overturned," said California legal scholar Mary Ziegler, referring to the 2022 Supreme Court decision.
"And those are just, I think in some ways, the tip of the iceberg. We're likely to see a lot more of these cross-border fights.
"From Texas or Louisiana's standpoint, they're saying: 'Why is this doctor mailing pills into our state?'" explained Ziegler, a professor at the law school at the University of California, Davis.
"And from New York's standpoint, they're saying: 'Our doctor wasn't doing anything wrong. Why are you trying to prosecute her?'"
- 'Chilling effect' -
In Texas, Attorney General Ken Paxton declared that "out-of-state doctors may not illegally and dangerously prescribe abortion-inducing drugs to Texas residents."
Margaret Carpenter, a New York doctor and a co-founder of the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, was ordered to stop sending pills to Texas and fined $100,000.
In Louisiana, she faces criminal charges and the state has demanded her extradition, to which New York Governor Kathy Hochul responded: "Not now, not ever."
Hochul said the state's shield law was designed to "anticipate this very situation."
According to #WeCount, an initiative that collates abortion statistics nationwide, 10 percent of abortions in the second quarter of 2024 were conducted under the protection of shield laws.
This accounts for approximately 10,000 women each month.
In Louisiana, this was the solution chosen by 60 percent of women -- about 2,500 -- to terminate pregnancies in the second half of 2023, #WeCount estimates.
Now, abortion rights activists fear that individual doctors will be targeted.
"The tactic of going after providers, patients and helpers through the courts is definitely something that we are going to see them try more of," Amy Friedrich-Karnik, of the Guttmacher Institute, told AFP.
"And I think the goal is both to, you know, scare those individuals... and there's a chilling effect from that," said Friedrich-Karnik, a policy director at the pro-abortion rights think tank.
The legal battles will be long, and the results are far from certain. Some cases may get to the Supreme Court, and it is not clear whether President Donald Trump's administration will attempt to intervene.
"This is a long-lasting debate, even if it goes to the Supreme Court," Ziegler said.
"Because then what would happen is the next case that comes along will be different enough that whatever the Supreme Court has to say about these cases won't give us the answer necessarily," she said.
"There's not... going to be one clean solution that the Supreme Court reaches that resolves this once and for all."
- Procedure rejected -
Meanwhile, the attorneys general of Idaho, Kansas and Missouri have demanded that the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) end prescriptions of the pill via online medical visits -- effectively restricting access nationwide.
A similar request was nevertheless rejected by the Supreme Court in 2024.
"There's uncertainty about what Trump is going to do. There's uncertainty about what power states have to project power outside of state lines. There's uncertainty about what the FDA is going to do," Ziegler said.
"Simply not knowing can impact patients and doctors. But that's the scenario right now -- there's a big question mark around a lot of it."
H.Portela--PC