-
England, Portugal eye top spots as World Cup group stages wrap up
-
Injured Australian pair Leckie, Italiano out of World Cup
-
Farmers fear drought as Italy's longest river runs dry
-
Thousands expected as Vespa celebrates 80 years in Rome
-
Budapest Pride to push for equality after reversed ban
-
Pino, Williams injuries mar Spain's World Cup progress
-
World Cup fans get taste of American life -- at the mall
-
'Struggle continues' in Bolivia's Morales heartland
-
World Cup turns New York's Times Square into global fan hub
-
Bielsa accepts blame for World Cup exit, but says Uruguay deserved more
-
Lebanon, Israel and US sign trilateral framework pact
-
Uruguay crash out of World Cup as Spain avoid Argentina clash
-
Cape Verde extend World Cup fairytale to set up Argentina meeting
-
Swiss glaciers facing drastic loss from heatwave: expert
-
Messi to start dead-rubber World Cup group match on bench
-
Trump unveils new US passport -- with picture of himself
-
Hat-trick hero Dembele displays Ballon d'Or brilliance for France at World Cup
-
Maple Leafs make teen McKenna top pick in NHL Draft
-
Injured England defender James to miss Panama game at World Cup
-
California appeals court orders Weinstein resentencing for sex assault
-
Norway coach defends decision to leave out Haaland, Odegaard against France
-
Scheffler fires 60 to grab 36-hole PGA Travelers lead
-
Movie theaters are allies for streamers like us, Apple exec says
-
Austria's Rangnick shuts down conspiracy talk ahead of Algeria World Cup clash
-
DR Congo must take risks to keep World Cup 'dream alive', says Desabre
-
Should we fear an AI bubble bust?
-
Jangoo, Chase keep West Indies in touch against Sri Lanka
-
Dembele hat-trick as France swat Norway, Senegal stay alive
-
Gueye double keeps Senegal's World Cup hopes alive
-
Dembele hits hat-trick as France thrash second-string Norway at World Cup
-
US stocks recover from tech tremors as oil prices fall
-
Globalization isn't dead, just 'transformed,' says IMF chief economist
-
OpenAI restricts limited release of new model to US only
-
Israel and Lebanon hail Washington deal, rejected by Hezbollah
-
Scheffler fires 60 to grab early PGA Travelers lead
-
Usyk -- pugilist who kept Ukrainian spirits high in darkest days
-
Trump blasts 'godless' Democrats in incendiary speech to evangelicals
-
Orange wave: Dutch World Cup dream gathers pace
-
Venezuela earthquakes kill 920, tens of thousands missing
-
Swiss nuclear plant shut down due to heatwave
-
Hundred hero Duckett punishes New Zealand after Stokes sparks England revival
-
American businesswoman Michele Kang buys French club Lyon
-
South Korea coach bereft of answers with World Cup hopes on knife-edge
-
Lebanon, Israel, US sign trilateral framework agreement in Washington
-
Mistrial declared in deadly Los Angeles fire case
-
Antonelli scores 'double top' for Mercedes as Russell warns of McLaren threat
-
Verstappen wants to stay at Red Bull – in a fast car, says Mekies
-
Australia eye 'something special' after reaching World Cup last 32
-
Usyk says vacating heavyweight world title belts
-
Germany sees hottest temperature on record of 41.3C: weather service
Carbon capture: how does CO2 removal work?
With global temperatures still on the rise, even the most sceptical of scientists agree that carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is crucial to meet the Paris Agreement goal of capping global warming below two degrees Celsius.
A new global assessment published Thursday says limiting global warming at liveable levels will be impossible without massively scaling up CDR.
But even the most ardent promoters of carbon removal technology insist that slashing emissions remains the primary objective, even if the continued failure to do so has pushed CDR sharply higher on the climate agenda.
Methods range from conventional techniques like restoring or expanding CO2-absorbing forests and wetlands, to more novel technologies such as direct air capture.
Here AFP explains the essentials on CO2 removal:
- What is CO2 removal? -
There are basically two ways to extract CO2 from thin air.
One is to boost nature's capacity to absorb and stockpile carbon. Healing degraded forests, restoring mangroves, industrial-scale tree planting, boosting carbon uptake in rocks or the ocean -- all fall under the hotly debated category of "nature-based solutions".
The second way -- called direct air capture -- uses chemical processes to strip out CO2, then recycles it for industrial use or locks it away in porous rock formations, unused coal beds or saline aquifers.
A variation known as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, or BECCS, combines elements from both approaches.
Wood pellets or other biomass is converted into biofuels or burned to drive turbines that generate electricity. The CO2 emitted is roughly cancelled out by the CO2 absorbed during plant growth.
But when carbon dioxide in the power plant's exhaust is syphoned off and stored underground, the process becomes a net-negative technology.
- Do we really need it? -
Yes, for a couple of reasons.
Even if the world begins drawing down carbon pollution by three, four or five percent each year -- and that is a significant "if" -- some sectors like cement and steel production, long-haul aviation and agriculture are expected to maintain significant emission levels for decades.
The first-ever State of Carbon Dioxide report concluded that CDR must extract between 450 billion and 1.1 trillion tonnes of CO2 over the remainder of the 21st century -- the equivalent of 10 to 30 times annual CO2 emissions today.
And there is another reason.
The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) makes it alarmingly clear that the 1.5C threshold will be breached in the coming decades no matter how aggressively greenhouse gases are drawn down.
CO2 lingers in the atmosphere for centuries, which means that the only way to bring Earth's average surface temperature back under the wire by 2100 is to suck some of it out of the air.
- What's hot, what's not? -
BECCS was pencilled into IPCC climate models more than a decade ago as the theoretically cheapest form of negative emissions, but has barely developed since.
A peer-reviewed proposal in 2019 to draw down excess CO2 by planting a trillion trees sparked huge excitement in the media and among gas and oil companies that have made afforestation offsets a central to their efforts to align with Paris treaty goals.
But the idea was sharply criticised by experts, who pointed out that it would require converting twice the area of India into mono-culture tree farms.
"I don't see a BECCS boom," said Oliver Geden, a senior fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and an expert on CDR.
Also, planting trees to soak up CO2 is fine -- until the forests burn down in climate-enhanced wildfires.
Among all the carbon dioxide removal methods, direct air capture is among the least developed but the most talked about.
- How fast can we scale up? -
Direct air capture (DAC) is a large-scale industrial process that requires huge amounts of energy to run.
Existing technology is also a long way from making a dent in the problem.
The amount, for example, of CO2 potentially extracted from what will be the world's largest direct air capture plant (36,000 tonnes) -- being built in Iceland by Swiss company Climeworks -- is equivalent to 30 seconds' worth of current global emissions (about 40 billion tonnes).
But the trajectory of earlier technologies such as solar panels suggests that scaling the industry up to remove billions of tonnes per year is not out of reach.
"It's at the upper end of what we've seen before," University of Wisconsin–Madison professor Gregory Nemet. "It's a huge challenge, but it's not unprecedented."
Climeworks announced last week the world's first certified CO2 removal and storage on behalf of paying clients, including Microsoft and software service company Stripe.
M.A.Vaz--PC