-
German Cup final to stay in Berlin until 2030
-
What does Iran want from talks with the US?
-
Taming the lion: Olympians take on Bormio's terrifying Stelvio piste
-
Wind turbine maker Vestas sees record revenue in 2025
-
Italy's Casse tops second Olympic downhill training
-
Anti-doping boss 'uncomfortable' with Valieva's coach at Olympics
-
Bitcoin under $70,000 for first time since Trump's election
-
'I am sorry,' embattled UK PM tells Epstein victims
-
England's Brook predicts record 300-plus scores at T20 World Cup
-
Ukraine, Russia swap prisoners, US says 'work remains' to end war
-
Wales' Rees-Zammit at full-back for Six Nations return against England
-
Sad horses and Draco Malfoy: China's unexpected Lunar New Year trends
-
Hong Kong students dissolve pro-democracy group under 'severe' pressure
-
Germany claws back 59 mn euros from Amazon over price controls
-
Germany claws back 70 mn euros from Amazon over price controls
-
VW and Stellantis urge help to keep carmaking in Europe
-
Stock markets drop amid tech concerns before rate calls
-
BBVA posts record profit after failed Sabadell takeover
-
UN human rights agency in 'survival mode': chief
-
Greenpeace slams fossil fuel sponsors for Winter Olympics
-
Greenpeace slams fossel fuel sponsors for Winter Olympics
-
Kinghorn, Van der Merwe dropped by Scotland for Six Nations opener
-
Russia says thwarted smuggling of giant meteorite to UK
-
Salt war heats up in ice-glazed Berlin
-
Liverpool in 'good place' for years to come, says Slot
-
Heathrow still Europe's busiest airport, but Istanbul gaining fast
-
Highest storm alert lifted in Spain, one woman missing
-
Shell profits climb despite falling oil prices
-
Pakistan will seek govt nod in potential India T20 finals clash
-
German factory orders rise at fastest rate in 2 years in December
-
Nigeria president deploys army after new massacre
-
Ukraine, Russia, US start second day of war talks
-
Nepal's youth lead the charge in the upcoming election
-
Sony hikes forecasts even as PlayStation falters
-
Rijksmuseum puts the spotlight on Roman poet's epic
-
Trump fuels EU push to cut cord with US tech
-
Fearless talent: Five young players to watch at the T20 World Cup
-
India favourites as T20 World Cup to begin after chaotic build-up
-
Voter swings raise midterm alarm bells for Trump's Republicans
-
Australia dodges call for arrest of visiting Israel president
-
Countries using internet blackouts to boost censorship: Proton
-
Top US news anchor pleads with kidnappers for mom's life
-
Thailand's pilot PM on course to keep top job
-
The coming end of ISS, symbol of an era of global cooperation
-
New crew set to launch for ISS after medical evacuation
-
Family affair: Thailand waning dynasty still election kingmaker
-
Japan's first woman PM tipped for thumping election win
-
Stocks in retreat as traders reconsider tech investment
-
LA officials call for Olympic chief to resign over Epstein file emails
-
Ukraine, Russia, US to start second day of war talks
Prince Harry takes on the press - under oath
Prince Harry's appearance at the High Court in London on Tuesday was a world away from the gentle questioning of a friendly interviewer on prime-time television.
Instead, King Charles III's younger son was up against lawyer Andrew Green, King's Counsel, a courteous but relentless inquisitor representing British tabloid publishers Mirror Group Newspapers.
Harry and his American wife Meghan have made much of speaking their truth about their struggles inside the royal family since they left for the United States in early 2020.
But in the witness box of court 15 of the Rolls Building, a modern annexe to the Gothic halls of the Royal Courts of Justice, the goal was hard facts to support his claim of illegal practices.
"I swear by almighty God that the evidence I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth," Harry swore on the Bible.
Harry's testimony is the first by a senior royal to be given in court since the 1890s. His lawyer, David Sherborne, was keen to ensure the court had the correct form of address.
He was first referred to as "Your Royal Highness" but Harry, dressed in a dark business suit, said he preferred "Prince Harry".
Then Green stepped up to cross-examine him on his written witness statement but not before apologising on behalf of MGN for one case of unlawful activity.
"MGN unreservedly apologises to you for that, it should never have happened and it will never happen again," he said.
The apology is the only one MGN has made. It disputes Harry's claim that its newspapers engaged in illegal information-gathering, including phone hacking, for stories about the prince.
- Details -
Green went over details, questioning Harry on the substance of his allegations that about 140 articles published by MGN titles between 1996 and 2010 contained information gleaned by unlawful methods.
Thirty-three articles have been selected for consideration at the trial.
Had Harry read them? How did he know the information was obtained illegally? he asked.
Harry wasn't sure as they dated back 20 years. Possibly, he said. Maybe, he added, as he explained how he was relentlessly targeted from a young age.
"I've experienced hostility from the press since I was born," he told the court.
It had made him paranoid and cost him close friends and relationships.
"Your circle starts to shrink," he said.
Green asked Harry to explain what he meant in his written testimony that some journalists had "blood on their hands".
"Some of the editors and journalists that are responsible for causing a lot of pain, upset and in some cases, speaking personally, death," he said, referring to his mother, Princess Diana.
She was killed in a 1997 car crash in Paris, while being pursued by paparazzi.
But Harry did not name any specific journalist, explaining that the phrase was aimed "more broadly towards the press".
Questioned about an article from 2002 that claimed he smoked cannabis, Harry took aim at his own family for cooperating with the newspaper.
Green suggested it was legitimately in the public interest, as Harry was the son of the future king and in the line of succession.
There was a difference "between public interest and what interests the public", the prince replied.
"Every element of it was distressing," he said.
A.F.Rosado--PC