-
Freshways milk-price cut deepens pressure on UK dairy farms
-
India climbs green-transition ranking after first emissions decline in 25 years
-
Labour and National remain virtually tied as New Zealand vote count advances
-
Trump names Stephen Miller as White House chief of staff after midterm losses
-
The Good Daughter adapts Karin Slaughter thriller with Rose Byrne and Meghann Fahy
-
Restored Albanian tower houses anchor new rural tourism trail
-
Heavy-lift drone evacuates wounded Ukrainian soldier from frontline kill zone
-
Sonia Gandhi reflects on family tragedy and reluctant political career
-
Morrison says West Brom recovered after pressure from successive derby losses
-
Pope Leo begins three-country South American tour in Uruguay
-
Britain considers 2027 state visit for Ukraine’s Zelensky
-
Khawaja says entire Australia camp knew of 2018 ball-tampering plan
-
China and Gabon Elevate Ties to 'Shared Future' Amid State Visit
-
Portuguese Finance Minister to Review Socialist Budget Amendments
-
World Golf Awards 2026 to be Hosted at Egypt’s Madinaty Golf Club
-
Early Polar Vortex Disruption Creates Uncertain Winter Outlook for Pennsylvania
-
12 Billion Gallons of Raw Sewage Discharged into Chicago River Despite Deep Tunnel Infrastructure
-
Stadler Begins Testing First Hydrogen Narrow-Gauge Trains for Southern Italy
-
Edmund Richardson Wins Baillie Gifford Prize for 'Alexander' Biography
'Napoleon' movie too 'anti-French' for some in France
The French have had decidedly mixed early reactions to Ridley Scott's "Napoleon", which premiered in Paris this week, with one historian calling the movie "very anti-French".
The first reviews have been unanimous in their praise of the huge-scale battle scenes that punctuate the film, which is released worldwide from next Wednesday.
But some French critics and experts who saw early previews were less than impressed with the depiction of their most famous historical figure, played by "Joker" star Joaquin Phoenix.
Historian Patrice Gueniffey told Le Point magazine that Scott "clearly doesn't like Napoleon".
"We are treated to a caricature of an ambitious Corsican ogre, a sullen boor, who is also disgusting with his wife, Josephine," said Gueniffey, who also took issue with the "fanciful" statistics at the end of the film saying Napoleon was responsible for three million deaths.
Spoiler alert: the film concludes with Napoleon's defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, which Gueniffey took as proof of English-born Scott's "very anti-French and very pro-English" approach.
Others felt that was unfair.
"(Scott's) view of the man is not flattering, but nor does it ignore what made his greatness," wrote reviewer Jean-Philippe Gunet on X, formerly known as Twitter.
There have been grumbles about the historical accuracy of some details.
In a YouTube video, Emilie Robbe, a Bonaparte expert at France's Army Museum, argued that Napoleon never fired on the pyramids in Egypt, while British historian Dan Snow said Napoleon was not present at the execution of Marie-Antoinette, which opens the film.
Scott has responded bluntly to such fact-checking. "Get a life," he said in the pages of the New Yorker.
Some French critics were just a bit bored, however.
"Far from the expected epic biopic, 'Napoleon' proves too dull and didactic to live up to its subject," wrote Les Numeriques.
Popular TikTok reviewer Mehdi Omais said it felt "more like a Wikipedia page than something deeply explored."
A.Silveira--PC