-
Rising Kenyan lakes push crocodiles closer to homes
-
Pacific islands alarmed by Trump-backed push for deep-sea mining
-
Istanbul cymbals: From Ottoman war tool to pulse of global music
-
Erratic rains dictate menu at three-star Michelin restaurant in Brazil
-
Myanmar ex-junta chief on first Thailand trip as civilian leader
-
Zverev, Auger-Aliassime and Medvedev exit Montreal Masters
-
Environmental disaster looms as tanker leaks off Oman
-
Google-parent Alphabet shakes up AI division
-
Embattled Infantino sees minnows Malawi reach WAFCON quarter-finals
-
FIFA back Infantino, apologise for World Cup privatisation plan
-
Seeds Rybakina, Pegula and Gauff advance at WTA Toronto event
-
Auger-Aliassime out of Montreal ATP event with injury
-
Zverev, Auger-Aliassime exit star-short Montreal Masters
-
Colombian baby hippo of Escobar stock dies after rescue
-
Embattled FIFA chief Infantino in emergency talks in Morocco
-
Preakness shifts 2027 dates to entice more Derby horses
-
Castaway SpaceX rocket stage crashed into Moon, scientists say
-
Guatemalan volcano eruption ends, locals return home
-
Dow edges to record as markets parse prospects for Hormuz deal
-
WHO chief urges stronger Ebola response in DR Congo visit
-
Salah arrives in Turkey to complete Trabzonspor move
-
Newcastle appoint Jaissle as new head coach after Howe exit
-
AFP journalist to be honored at International Press Freedom Awards
-
Swiss ski star Lara Gut-Behrami calls time on 18-year career
-
Turkish MPs back limited amnesty for Kurdish militants
-
US indicts leaders of Mexico's CJNG cartel, ups reward money
-
Noosha Aubel: Czy poradzi sobie z problemami Poczdamu?
-
Noosha Aubel: Klarar hon av Potsdams problem?
-
Noosha Aubel: Είναι σε θέση να αντιμετωπίσει τα προβλήματα του Πότσδαμ;
-
Noosha Aubel: Zvládne problémy Postupimi?
-
نوشا أوبيل: هل هي على مستوى التحديات التي تواجهها بوتسدام؟
-
Former England fly-half Burns retires from rugby union
-
Brazil hits new diplomatic lows with US and Argentina
-
Pakistan beat West Indies by eight wickets to level series
-
NZ boxer Parker promises ring return after doping ban 'lifted'
-
Reusser holds lead as Vollering wins in Tour de France hills
-
Disney profits top estimates on strength in theme park business
-
Argentina's Albornoz hit with four-game ban for 'intimidatory' referee abuse
-
LIV Golf CEO says funding secured to play beyond 2026
-
Guatemala volcano eruption eases off, but alert remains in place
-
Stocks stall tracking earnings, oil dips on Iran-Oman Hormuz move
-
Baby hippo descended from Escobar's herd rescued in Colombia
-
Tuipulotu to lead New Zealand in South African tour opener
-
Woman arrested after four men stabbed in central London
-
Leftist Democrat urges unity after victory in Michigan
-
Celtic boss O'Neill in hospital after 'small procedure'
-
Austria, Slovakia hit new temperature records
-
Israeli forces raid Palestinian refugee camp near Jerusalem
-
Where mountain lions roam, fewer deer in the headlights
-
Explosive drone found near Ukrainian plane at German airport
US tariff dispute: No winner
The trade conflict between the US and China, which began in 2018, has had a lasting impact on the global economy. Under the leadership of President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping, a bitter tariff dispute developed, characterised by reciprocal punitive tariffs and countermeasures. In April 2025, both countries agreed to a temporary reduction in tariffs: the US reduced its tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, while China reduced tariffs on US products from 125% to 10%. This 90-day agreement is seen as a step towards de-escalation, but a final resolution of the conflict remains elusive.
Origin and development
It all began in March 2018, when the US imposed tariffs on Chinese imports worth 50 billion dollars in order to reduce the trade deficit and protect domestic industries. China responded promptly with its own tariffs on US goods, triggering a spiral of escalation. Over the years, tariffs were imposed on goods worth hundreds of billions of dollars, ranging from technology products to agricultural goods and consumer goods. This conflict quickly became a central element of the geopolitical rivalry between the two superpowers.
The Phase One Agreement
A milestone was the ‘Phase One’ agreement in January 2020. China committed to purchasing an additional $200 billion worth of US goods over two years, including agricultural products and industrial goods. Improvements in intellectual property protection and a waiver of forced technology transfers were also agreed. However, implementation lagged behind: China did not fully meet its purchase commitments, which kept tensions high and prompted the US to consider new measures.
Current situation
The April 2025 agreement marks another attempt to defuse the conflict. Nevertheless, the situation remains fragile. China has intensified its trade relations with countries in Southeast Asia in order to reduce its dependence on the US market. At the same time, the US is threatening new tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, which could reignite the dispute. These developments make it clear that the tariff dispute goes far beyond pure trade policy and is deeply embedded in strategic considerations.
Economic impact
The economic consequences are being felt by both sides. In the US, higher import prices have weighed on consumers, while companies are struggling with higher costs and disrupted supply chains. China has seen its economic growth slow, but has shown resilience thanks to diversified trading partnerships. The conflict has not only damaged bilateral relations, but also reshaped the global economy as both countries seek to minimise their mutual dependence.
Conclusion: A stalemate with no winners
The tariff dispute between Trump and Xi Jinping has not produced a clear winner. Although the US was able to force some concessions, China has strengthened its strategic position through diversification and technological independence. Both countries are paying a high economic price, and the latest tariff reduction is merely a temporary truce. The conflict remains an open chapter in the rivalry between the US and China, with neither side gaining the upper hand.
NATO: Ukraine ‘at the top of the list!’
NATO: Ukraine ‘at the top of the list!’
Belarus: ICC investigates dictator Lukashenko
Terrorist state Iran attacks Israel with missiles
Lebanon: Is a new wave of refugees coming to the EU?
AI sparks Wall Street panic
EU misstep on mercosur Deal
Japan’s right‑turn triumph
Trump vs Intel: Chip endgame?
Tariffs roil U.S.–India ties
India defies U.S. tariffs