-
CK Hutchison begins arbitration against Panama over annulled canal contract
-
UNESCO recognition inspires hope in Afghan artist's city
-
Ukraine, Russia, US negotiators gather in Abu Dhabi for war talks
-
WTO must 'reform or die': talks facilitator
-
Doctors hope UK archive can solve under-50s bowel cancer mystery
-
Stocks swing following latest AI-fuelled sell-off on Wall St
-
Demanding Dupont set to fire France in Ireland opener
-
Britain's ex-prince Andrew leaves Windsor home: BBC
-
Coach plots first South Africa World Cup win after Test triumph
-
Spin-heavy Pakistan hit form, but India boycott risks early T20 exit
-
Japan eyes Premier League parity by aligning calendar with Europe
-
Whack-a-mole: US academic fights to purge his AI deepfakes
-
Love in a time of war for journalist and activist in new documentary
-
'Unprecedented mass killing': NGOs battle to quantify Iran crackdown scale
-
Seahawks kid Cooper Kupp seeks new Super Bowl memories
-
Thousands of Venezuelans march to demand Maduro's release
-
AI, manipulated images falsely link some US politicians with Epstein
-
Move on, says Trump as Epstein files trigger probe into British politician
-
Arteta backs Arsenal to build on 'magical' place in League Cup final
-
Evil Empire to underdogs: Patriots eye 7th Super Bowl
-
UBS grilled on Capitol Hill over Nazi-era probe
-
Guardiola 'hurt' by suffering caused in global conflicts
-
Marseille do their work early to beat Rennes in French Cup
-
Trump signs spending bill ending US government shutdown
-
Arsenal sink Chelsea to reach League Cup final
-
Leverkusen sink St Pauli to book spot in German Cup semis
-
'We just need something positive' - Monks' peace walk across US draws large crowds
-
Milan close gap on Inter with 3-0 win over Bologna
-
No US immigration agents at Super Bowl: security chief
-
NASA Moon mission launch delayed to March after test
-
Spain to seek social media ban for under-16s
-
LIV Golf events to receive world ranking points: official
-
US House passes spending bill ending government shutdown
-
US jet downs Iran drone but talks still on course
-
UK police launching criminal probe into ex-envoy Mandelson
-
US-Iran talks 'still scheduled' after drone shot down: White House
-
Chomsky sympathized with Epstein over 'horrible' press treatment
-
French prosecutors stick to demand for five-year ban for Le Pen
-
Russia's economic growth slowed to 1% in 2025: Putin
-
Bethell spins England to 3-0 sweep over Sri Lanka in World Cup warm-up
-
Nagelsmann backs Ter Stegen for World Cup despite 'cruel' injury
-
Homage or propaganda? Carnival parade stars Brazil's Lula
-
EU must be 'less naive' in COP climate talks: French ministry
-
Colombia's Petro meets Trump after months of tensions
-
Air India inspects Boeing 787 fuel switches after grounding
-
US envoy evokes transition to 'democratic' Venezuela
-
Syria govt forces enter Qamishli under agreement with Kurds
-
WHO wants $1 bn for world's worst health crises in 2026
-
France summons Musk, raids X offices as deepfake backlash grows
-
Four out of every 10 cancer cases are preventable: WHO
Intel sees record EU fine reduced further
The EU General Court dealt a blow to the European Commission on Wednesday in reducing what was initially a record fine against US chipmaker Intel to 237 million euros ($276 million) -- a quarter of the original sum.
Brussels imposed an initial 1.06-billion-euro fine on the group in 2009, then a record amount, for abusing its dominant market position between 2002 and 2007 and attempting to drive its only serious competitor, AMD, out of the microprocessor market.
Intel has since engaged in lengthy legal proceedings to have the fine overturned.
In 2022, it won its case when the General Court, based in Luxembourg, partially invalidated the penalty and ordered the Commission to reassess the total fine.
In September 2023, Brussels set a new amount of 376 million euros.
But the US group again appealed.
In the new ruling published Wednesday, the court said it had "substantially upheld the 2023 decision", but reduced the fine to 237 million euros.
The court justified the move citing, firstly, the "relatively limited number of computers" affected by certain restrictions Intel imposed on computer manufacturers such as Acer and Lenovo to hinder AMD.
Secondly, it cited a 12-month interval between "some of the anti-competitive practices".
A.Seabra--PC