-
Civilians lynched in Mali witch hunt after jihadist, rebel attacks
-
US targets Cuban military, mine in new sanctions
-
Marsh ton sets up Lucknow win in rain-hit IPL clash
-
Google faces new UK lawsuit over online display ads
-
Yankees outfielder Dominguez collides with wall making catch
-
NY to hire 500 addiction recovery mentors with opioid settlement cash
-
Trump says he would not pay $1,000 to watch US at World Cup
-
Dubois vows to take out 'trash' WBO heavyweight champion Wardley
-
France to ban CBD edibles: sources
-
Twin jihadist-claimed attacks kill more than 30 in Mali
-
US oil blockade on Cuba 'energy starvation': UN experts
-
Zelensky warns against attending Russia's parade as Moscow repeats threats
-
Millwall eye 'fairytale' in Championship play-offs
-
Hantavirus not like Covid: doctor treating patient in Netherlands
-
Covid flashbacks haunt Canary Islands as hantavirus ship nears
-
IOC lifts Olympic ban on Belarus but Russia 'still suspended'
-
IMF warns of 'inevitable' AI-powered threats to global financial system
-
Brighton boss Hurzeler agrees new three-year deal
-
WHO says now five confirmed cruise ship hantavirus cases
-
Spurs boss De Zerbi shrugs off criticism of win over weakened Villa
-
Sinner demands 'respect' from Grand Slams, Djokovic lends support in prize money row
-
Germany warns tax revenues to be hit by Iran war
-
Italy's tennis chief wants to break Grand Slam 'monopoly' with new major
-
IOC rules out 'crossover' sports at 2030 Winter Olympics
-
WHO warns of more hantavirus cases in 'limited' outbreak
-
Real Madrid's Valverde treated in hospital after Tchouameni clash: reports
-
Past hantavirus outbreak shows how Andes virus spreads
-
EU prosecutors probe alleged misuse of funds linked to France's Bardella
-
UK police officers probed over handling of Al-Fayed complaints
-
Paolini begins Italian Open title defence by battling past Jeanjean
-
Brazil must channel World Cup pressure into motivation: Luiz Henrique
-
AI use surges globally but rich-poor divide widens, Microsoft says
-
Carrick says strong finish matters more than his Man Utd future
-
IOC lifts Olympic ban on Belarus but Russia still barred
-
Sinner demands 'respect' from Grand Slams in prize money row
-
PSG set to wrap up Ligue 1 crown after reaching Champions League final
-
Struggling Chelsea have 'foundations for success': interim boss McFarlane
-
US underlines 'strong' Vatican ties after Rubio meets pope
-
Defence giant Rheinmetall makes offer for further shipyard
-
Royal and Ancient Golf Club names Claire Dowling as first woman captain in 272 years
-
Portugal's last circus elephant becomes pioneer for European exiles
-
Bruised Bayern 'already motivated' for next Champions League tilt
-
Mbappe, Mourinho, meltdown: Real Madrid face Clasico amid chaos
-
Ex-Germany defender Suele to retire aged 30
-
Royal and Ancient Golf Club names first woman captain after 272 years
-
Welsh singer Bonnie Tyler 'recuperating' after emergency surgery in Portugal
-
US awaits Iran response to latest deal offer
-
No tanks, no internet, simmering discontent: Putin to host nervous May 9 parade
-
Bangladesh and Pakistan renew rivalry in first Test
-
England captain Stokes '100 percent to bowl' on return to cricket
Deal or no deal: What's the state of Trump's tariffs?
US President Donald Trump's push to reimpose tariffs after his Supreme Court setback has raised questions about his trade deals and future plans, while fueling a rush for refunds.
Here is the state of play as Trump moves to rebuild his trade agenda:
- Where do his tariffs stand? -
Trump's new 10-percent tariff on imports took effect Tuesday and will last for 150 days. It is widely viewed as a bridge towards more lasting action.
This does not apply to sectors targeted by separate investigations such as steel, aluminum and autos, nor does it hit the swath of goods entering the United States under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
Trump has pledged to raise this tariff to 15 percent.
But US trade envoy Jamieson Greer maintained Wednesday on Fox Business that Washington seeks continuity in its trade policy.
"We have the 10-percent tariff. It'll go up to 15 for some, and then it may go higher for others," he said. "I think it will be in line with the types of tariffs we've been seeing."
A uniform tariff hike to 15 percent will strike partners like Britain, who faced a lower level previously.
- Why are countries not retaliating? -
US trading partners who have struck deals with Washington have so far been seeking clarity but avoided clashes over the new tariffs.
"A lot of the issue is the sector-specific exemptions that they got," said former US trade official Ryan Majerus, now a partner at King & Spalding.
The European Union, Japan and South Korea all struck deals that lowered US tariffs on their car exports, from 25 percent to 15 percent.
As sectoral tariffs were not affected by the high court ruling, Majerus told AFP that countries would be wary of giving up their gains.
If they violate their trade pacts, Washington could also further penalize them under well-established laws.
- What are Trump's plans? -
The Trump administration has signaled plans to reimpose more lasting tariffs -- citing national security concerns or unfair trading practices as a justification.
These are areas where Washington can have "very durable tariffs where necessary," Greer told Fox Business. "They've stood up to legal scrutiny in the past, and they will again."
Trump's existing sector-specific tariffs for example were imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, which allows the president to roll out levies over national security risks.
Another authority, Section 301 of the Trade Act, allows Washington to address unfair foreign trade practices. It was Trump's main instrument to target China in his first presidency.
Trump's future tariffs could cover industries like large-scale batteries, cast iron and iron fittings, plastic piping, industrial chemicals and power grid and telecom equipment, The Wall Street Journal reported. These would be issued under Section 232.
Besides these, trade lawyer Dave Townsend of Dorsey & Whitney expects to see "exceedingly broad" investigations under Section 301 that would allow Trump "to impose tariffs on many, if not most, countries."
"By the end of the year, we would be back pretty close to where we were last week," he said.
- Who gets refunds? -
Separately, US importers are battling for tariff refunds, an issue the Supreme Court ruling did not cover.
Greer maintained that "those claims are proceeding," adding that lower courts will deal with that.
"They'll tell us the time, place and manner of any type of refund," he said.
But there could be further complications.
"Firms are unlikely to pass on the benefit of these refunds to consumers," said Bernard Yaros of Oxford Economics. "Most of the tariff cost has already fed through to core consumer goods prices."
The mechanics and timing of returns are also unclear.
The refunds process to importers may not be messy. But purchasers of goods, if they are not importers themselves, could have to litigate further to get their money back, Townsend told AFP.
L.Carrico--PC