-
Court case challenges New Zealand's 'magical thinking' climate plans
-
Iran war jolts China's well-oiled manufacturing hub
-
Oil sinks and stocks rally on peace hopes, Samsung tops $1 trillion
-
Infantino defends World Cup ticket prices
-
Pistons hold off Cavs to win series-opener
-
Rubio rising? Duel with Vance for 2028 heats up
-
Teen shooter kills two at Brazil school
-
US pauses Hormuz escorts in bid for deal, as threats continue
-
Judge orders German car-ramming suspect to psychiatric hospital
-
Fresh UAE attacks blamed on Iran draw new reality in the Gulf
-
Arsenal on cusp of history after reaching Champions League final
-
Trump says pausing Hormuz operation in push for Iran deal
-
Wembanyama accused of 'obvious' illegal blocking
-
Musk 'was going to hit me,' OpenAI executive says at trial
-
NFL star Diggs cleared of assaulting personal chef
-
Fans 'set the standards' at rocking Emirates: Arteta
-
Rubio warns against 'destabilizing' acts on Taiwan before Trump China visit
-
US declares Iran offensive over, warns force remains an option
-
Saka ends Arsenal's 20-year wait to reach Champions League final
-
Outgoing Costa Rica leader secures top post in new cabinet
-
Rubio plays down Trump attacks on pope before Vatican trip
-
LIV Golf boss sees hope for new sponsors beyond 2026
-
Mexican BTS fans go wild as concerts grow near
-
Europe's first commercial robotaxi service rolls out in Croatia
-
Russian strikes kill 21 in Ukraine
-
Suspected hantavirus cases to be evacuated from cruise ship
-
G7 trade ministers meet, not expected to discuss US tariff threat
-
Hollywood star Malkovich gets Croatian citizenship
-
Mickelson pulls out of PGA Championship for family issues
-
Wales rugby great Halfpenny to retire
-
Rahm says player concessions needed to save LIV Golf
-
Bowlers, Samson keep Chennai afloat in IPL playoff race
-
Rolling Stones announce July 10 release of new album 'Foreign Tongues'
-
France's Macron taps ex-aide to head central bank
-
PSG 'not here to defend' against Bayern, says Luis Enrique
-
Trump says he works out 'one minute a day' as he restores fitness award
-
Russia hits Ukraine with deadly strikes as Zelensky denounces Moscow's 'cynicism'
-
EU urges US to stick to tariff deal terms
-
Hantavirus on the Hondius: what we know
-
Rahm eligible for Ryder Cup after deal with European Tour
-
Stocks rise, oil falls as traders eye earnings, US-Iran ceasefire
-
Bayern's Kompany channels 'inner tranquility' before PSG showdown
-
Colombian mine explosion kills nine
-
Matthews latest England World Cup-winner out of Women's Six Nations
-
Race to find port for cruise ship battling deadly rodent virus
-
Celtic's O'Neill says Hearts' rise good for Scottish football
-
Ethiopia and Sudan accuse each other of attacks
-
Injured Mbappe faces backlash over Sardinia trip before Clasico
-
Vodafone to take full ownership of UK mobile operator
-
Stocks advance, oil falls as traders eye US-Iran ceasefire
Covid's origins reviewed: Lab leak or natural spillover?
Whether Covid-19 was unleashed by a laboratory mishap or spilled over from animals remains an enduring, fiercely contested mystery.
Here are the leading arguments that fuel both sides of this debate, as AFP reflects on the virus's impact five years after it reshaped the world.
- The case for lab leak -
Proponents of the lab-leak hypothesis highlight that the earliest known Covid-19 cases emerged in Wuhan, China -- home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), a major hub for coronavirus research -- located roughly 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) from the nearest bat populations carrying similar SARS-like viruses.
"Wuhan labs performed research that placed them on a trajectory to obtain SARS viruses having high pandemic potential," Richard Ebright, a microbiologist and professor at Rutgers University, told AFP.
"One year before the outbreak, Wuhan labs proposed research to obtain SARS viruses having even higher pandemic potential and features that match, in detail, the features of SARS CoV-2," he added.
This research proposal included engineering a structure called a "furin cleavage site," which increases viral growth and transmissibility but is absent in other SARS viruses.
Lab-leak advocates also cite concerns over biosafety standards at the Wuhan lab, where personnel reportedly only wore lab coats and gloves.
"There is sufficient evidence to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 entered humans through a research-related incident," Ebright concluded.
- The case for natural spillover -
On the other side, researchers like Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization at the University of Saskatchewan in Canada, argue that real-world "hard evidence" consistently points to a wholesale seafood market in Wuhan.
"We've actually been looking at an evidence base that is hard evidence. It's evidence that can be measured," she told AFP, including genomic, geographic and environmental sampling data.
She contends that the case for a lab origin, by contrast, is built on "what ifs" and speculation. That would include claims that proposals for research on ways to greatly increase virus transmissibility were publicly rejected but secretly carried out.
This perspective is supported by multiple studies, including one published in the prestigious journal Science that analyzed the geographic pattern of Covid-19 cases during December 2019. The study showed cases were tightly clustered around Wuhan's Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market.
Another study, which examined genomic data from the earliest cases, concluded that the virus likely did not circulate widely in humans before November 2019.
More recently, in September 2024, a study published in Cell identified raccoon dogs, palm civets, Amur hedgehogs, and bamboo rats at the market.
Notably, raccoon dogs, which are closely related to foxes, are known to carry and transmit viruses similar to SARS-CoV-2, suggesting they could have acted as intermediaries between bats and humans.
For Rasmussen, the appeal of the lab-leak theory reflects a desire for straightforward answers. If the blame lies with wayward scientists or China, she argues, people will believe in the possibility of straightforward fixes.
- Where things stand now -
One thing is certain: the lab-leak theory, once dismissed as a conspiracy theory, has gained mainstream traction. For now, the debate remains unresolved -- scientifically and politically.
Some US agencies, like the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Energy, support the lab-leak theory, albeit with varying levels of confidence, while most elements of the intelligence community lean toward natural origins.
Lab-leak proponents, such as Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at the Broad Institute and author of "Viral: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19," continue to advocate for the full declassification of intelligence data and an independent investigation in China beyond the 2021 World Health Organization probe.
"There are many aspects of the pandemic that have damaged public trust in science and health institutions," Chan told AFP. "The origin of the pandemic is one of these."
J.Pereira--PC