-
Ukraine, US to meet for third day, agree 'real progress' depends on Russia
-
Double wicket strike as New Zealand eye victory over West Indies
-
Peace medal and YMCA: Trump steals the show at World Cup draw
-
NBA legend Jordan in court as NASCAR anti-trust case begins
-
How coaches reacted to 2026 World Cup draw
-
Glasgow down Sale as Stomers win at Bayonne in Champions Cup
-
Trump takes aim at Europe in new security strategy
-
Witness in South Africa justice-system crimes probe shot dead
-
Tuchel urges England not to get carried away plotting route to World Cup glory
-
Russian ambassador slams EU frozen assets plan for Ukraine
-
2026 World Cup draw is kind to favorites as Trump takes limelight
-
WHO chief upbeat on missing piece of pandemic treaty
-
US vaccine panel upends hepatitis B advice in latest Trump-era shift
-
Ancelotti says Brazil have 'difficult' World Cup group with Morocco
-
Kriecmayr wins weather-disrupted Beaver Creek super-G
-
Ghostwriters, polo shirts, and the fall of a landmark pesticide study
-
Mixed day for global stocks as market digest huge Netflix deal
-
England boss Tuchel wary of 'surprise' in World Cup draw
-
10 university students die in Peru restaurant fire
-
'Sinners' tops Critics Choice nominations
-
Netflix's Warner Bros. acquisition sparks backlash
-
Frank Gehry: five key works
-
US Supreme Court to weigh Trump bid to end birthright citizenship
-
Frank Gehry, master architect with a flair for drama, dead at 96
-
'It doesn't make sense': Trump wants to rename American football
-
A day after peace accord signed, shelling forces DRC locals to flee
-
Draw for 2026 World Cup kind to favorites as Trump takes center stage
-
Netflix to buy Warner Bros. in deal of the decade
-
US sanctions equate us with drug traffickers: ICC dep. prosecutor
-
Migration and crime fears loom over Chile's presidential runoff
-
French officer charged after police fracture woman's skull
-
Fresh data show US consumers still strained by inflation
-
Eurovision reels from boycotts over Israel
-
Trump takes centre stage as 2026 World Cup draw takes place
-
Trump all smiles as he wins FIFA's new peace prize
-
US panel votes to end recommending all newborns receive hepatitis B vaccine
-
Title favourite Norris reflects on 'positive' Abu Dhabi practice
-
Stocks consolidate as US inflation worries undermine Fed rate hopes
-
Volcanic eruptions may have brought Black Death to Europe
-
Arsenal the ultimate test for in-form Villa, says Emery
-
Emotions high, hope alive after Nigerian school abduction
-
Another original Hermes Birkin bag sells for $2.86 mn
-
11 million flock to Notre-Dame in year since rising from devastating fire
-
Gymnast Nemour lifts lid on 'humiliation, tears' on way to Olympic gold
-
Lebanon president says country does not want war with Israel
-
France takes anti-drone measures after flight over nuclear sub base
-
Signing up to DR Congo peace is one thing, delivery another
-
'Amazing' figurines find in Egyptian tomb solves mystery
-
Palestinians say Israeli army killed man in occupied West Bank
-
McLaren will make 'practical' call on team orders in Abu Dhabi, says boss Brown
EU funding of NGOs 'too opaque', auditors find amid political storm
EU funding of non-governmental organisations is "too opaque", auditors found on Monday in a report set to further fan a heated political tussle over the financing of environmental groups.
The European Union awarded about 7.4 billion euros ($8 billion) to a plethora of NGOs between 2021 and 2023, but public information about who got the money and how it was used is patchy, the European Court of Auditors (ECA) said.
"EU funding for NGOs is too opaque and suffers from a lack of transparency," said Laima Andrikiene, the report's lead auditor. "We are not talking about peanuts here," she added, referring to the amounts involved.
Indications that the EU had earmarked some of the money it gave to environmental NGOs for use in lobbying European institutions sparked a political firestorm in Brussels earlier this year.
Right-wing lawmakers in the EU parliament have used reports that money given out under an environmental funding tool known as LIFE were tied to the lobbying of fellow lawmakers as fodder in a wider pushback against Brussels's green agenda.
Calls for a probe and a halt to the funding have met the resistance of left-wing parliamentarians.
The Socialists and Democrats group last week denounced an "outrageous assault" aimed at silencing civil society efforts to protect the environment.
"Greater transparency in how these funds are used is undoubtedly necessary. However, it is a mistake to point the finger at civil society in this debate," said Daniel Freund, a European lawmaker with the Greens.
In its report, the ECA said the commission did not clearly disclose the information it held on advocacy activities carried out by NGOs with EU money.
It lamented the lack of active checks to ensure that the funded groups were effectively independent NGOs and respected EU values -- as well as the absence of a "reliable overview" of just how much EU money is paid to NGOs.
In one case, one large research institute was categorised as an NGO although its governing body was composed solely of government representatives, it said.
Some of these shortcomings exposed the EU to "reputational risk", the ECA said.
"Transparency is key to ensuring credible participation by NGOs in EU policymaking," said Andrikiene.
As the lobbying controversy brewed last year, the commission reviewed its policies to ensure that grant agreements would not require recipients to lobby EU institutions.
In January, budget commissioner Piotr Serafin said the practice had been legal, but "inappropriate".
V.Fontes--PC