-
Merz heads to Gulf as Germany looks to diversify trade ties
-
Selection process for future Olympic hosts set for reform
-
Serbian minister on trial over Trump-linked hotel plan
-
UK PM says Mandelson 'lied', regrets appointing him US envoy
-
Cochran-Siegle tops first Olympic downhill training
-
Gaza health officials say strikes kill 21 after Israel says shots wounded officer
-
Injured Vonn's Olympic bid is 'inspirational', ski stars say
-
Albania arrests 20 for toxic waste trafficking
-
US-Africa trade deal renewal only 'temporary breather'
-
Mir sets pace on Sepang day two, Yamaha absent
-
Xi, Putin hail 'stabilising' China-Russia alliance
-
GSK boosted by specialty drugs, end to Zantac fallout
-
UK's ex-prince leaves Windsor home amid Epstein storm: reports
-
Sky is the limit for Ireland fly-half Prendergast, says captain Doris
-
Feyi-Waboso reminds England great Robinson of himself
-
Starmer faces MPs as pressure grows over Mandelson scandal
-
HRW urges pushback against 'aggressive superpowers'
-
Russia demands Ukraine give in as UAE talks open
-
Gaza civil defence says 17 killed in strikes after Israel says shots wounded officer
-
France's Kante joins Fenerbahce after Erdogan 'support'
-
CK Hutchison launches arbitration over Panama Canal port ruling
-
Stocks mostly rise as traders ignore AI-fuelled sell-off on Wall St
-
Acclaimed Iraqi film explores Saddam Hussein's absurd birthday rituals
-
On rare earth supply, Trump for once seeks allies
-
Ukrainian chasing sumo greatness after meteoric rise
-
Draper to make long-awaited return in Davis Cup qualifier
-
Can Ilia Malinin fulfil his promise at the Winter Olympics?
-
CK Hutchison begins arbitration against Panama over annulled canal contract
-
UNESCO recognition inspires hope in Afghan artist's city
-
Ukraine, Russia, US negotiators gather in Abu Dhabi for war talks
-
WTO must 'reform or die': talks facilitator
-
Doctors hope UK archive can solve under-50s bowel cancer mystery
-
Stocks swing following latest AI-fuelled sell-off on Wall St
-
Demanding Dupont set to fire France in Ireland opener
-
Britain's ex-prince Andrew leaves Windsor home: BBC
-
Coach plots first South Africa World Cup win after Test triumph
-
Spin-heavy Pakistan hit form, but India boycott risks early T20 exit
-
Japan eyes Premier League parity by aligning calendar with Europe
-
Whack-a-mole: US academic fights to purge his AI deepfakes
-
Love in a time of war for journalist and activist in new documentary
-
'Unprecedented mass killing': NGOs battle to quantify Iran crackdown scale
-
Seahawks kid Cooper Kupp seeks new Super Bowl memories
-
Thousands of Venezuelans march to demand Maduro's release
-
AI, manipulated images falsely link some US politicians with Epstein
-
Move on, says Trump as Epstein files trigger probe into British politician
-
Axon Neuroscience's Immunotherapy Selected for a Landmark Combination-Therapy Alzheimer’s Clinical Trial in US, Supported by a USD 151 Million Grant
-
CHAR Technologies Licenses High-Temperature Pyrolysis Technology to GazoTech SAS for Entry Into European Markets
-
Arteta backs Arsenal to build on 'magical' place in League Cup final
-
Evil Empire to underdogs: Patriots eye 7th Super Bowl
-
UBS grilled on Capitol Hill over Nazi-era probe
Overshooting 1.5C risks 'irreversible' climate impact: study
Any breach of what climate scientists agree is the safer limit on global warming would result in "irreversible consequences" for the planet, said a major academic study published on Wednesday.
Even temporarily exceeding 1.5 degrees Celsius before bringing temperatures back down -- a scenario known as an "overshoot" -- could cause sea level rises and other disastrous repercussions that might last millenia.
This "does away with the notion that overshoot delivers a similar climate outcome" to a future where more was done earlier to curb global warming, said Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, who led the study co-authored by 30 scientists.
The findings, three years in the making, are urgent, as the goal of capping global temperature rises at 1.5C above pre-industrial levels is slipping out of reach.
Emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases must nearly halve by 2030 if the world is to reach 1.5C -- the more ambitious target enshrined in the 2015 Paris climate accord.
Currently however, they are still rising.
Some kind of overshoot of 1.5C is increasingly being seen as inevitable by scientists and policymakers.
This new study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature, cautions against "overconfidence" in such a scenario when the dangers are not fully appreciated.
An overshoot could trigger impacts that last hundreds if not thousands of years, or cross "tipping points" that prompt large and unrepairable changes in earth's climate system, the scientists warn.
It could mean the thawing of permafrost and peatlands, carbon-rich landscapes that would release huge volumes of planet-heating greenhouse gases if lost.
And sea levels could rise an additional 40 centimetres (16 inches) if 1.5C is exceeded for a century, the authors said, an existential difference for vulnerable low-level island nations.
"For most climate indicators, there are irreversible consequences due to the temporary exceedance of, for example, the 1.5 degree limit," said Schleussner from the Austria-based International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis.
"Even if you brought temperatures back down again, the world that we are looking at is not the same as if you didn't overshoot."
- Act now -
Taken together, the world's existing pledges for climate action would result in nearly 3C of warming by 2100, according to the UN.
To reach 1.5C, emissions must be at net zero by 2050, which means balancing the amount of carbon dioxide produced against the amount humanity can remove from the atmosphere via technology.
This process, known as carbon removal, would need to be massively scaled up to pull global temperatures back down in the event of an overshoot, something that is far from guaranteed.
"We cannot be confident that temperature decline after overshoot is achievable within the timescales expected today," the authors wrote.
Schleussner said their findings reinforced "the urgency of governments acting to reduce emissions now and not later down the line, to keep peak warming as low as possible".
"If you want to limit the climate risks in an effective manner, the race to net zero needs to be seen for what it is," he said.
S.Caetano--PC