-
Indigenous Australians awarded major compensation in mining dispute
-
Bayer profit up but glyphosate sales struggle
-
New London museum woos younger visitors
-
Japan crisp packs to go colourless due to Iran war crunch
-
Mosquitoes: bloodsuckers and flower lovers
-
Russia, Ukraine end US-brokered truce with fresh attacks
-
Over 370 Afghan civilians killed in Pakistan conflict in three months: UN
-
Japan Olympic official sorry for 'utterly unacceptable' remarks
-
'Genuine urgency': China's underlying concerns at the Xi-Trump talks
-
Oil climbs on US-Iran deadlock, Seoul falls on calls for AI social tax
-
Bayer profit up on seed business but glyphosate sales struggle
-
James undecided on future after Lakers bow out of NBA playoffs
-
Japan baseball to punish dangerous swings after umpire hit
-
Israel takes the stage in semis of boycotted Eurovision
-
Even DJs don't escape junta's 'revolution' in Burkina Faso
-
Antarctic talks in Japan: key things to know
-
Thyssenkrupp cuts sales outlook on Mideast war
-
LeBron's Lakers eliminated from NBA playoffs as Thunder seal sweep
-
South Korea floats AI profit social tax as tech giants boom
-
'Big hug' or colder shoulder? Xi-Trump talks spotlight contrasting styles, expectations
-
New Zealand moves to halt lawsuits over climate damage
-
Emperor penguins in focus as Antarctic talks start in Japan
-
Why are some people mosquito magnets? Clues are emerging
-
What if we killed all mosquitoes?
-
US 'golden generation' raises World Cup hosts' expectations
-
Oil climbs but markets shrug off US-Iran deadlock
-
New Zealand boss Rennie calls up Henry to be All Blacks selector
-
Mitchell magic as Cavs down Pistons to level series
-
Dengue outpaces virus-blocking mosquitoes in Brazil
-
'Seeds of instability': Health disinfo targets Philippine leader
-
Vitamins over vaccines: misinformation entrenched amid Indonesia measles surge
-
Keir Starmer: British PM fighting for his political future
-
Epstein files on display at New York pop-up exhibit, all 3.5 million pages
-
Cannes Film Festival opens, grappling with AI and Hollywood
-
India's Dravid to co-own Dublin Guardians in European T20 league
-
Little respite in Ukraine as air strikes ring out during Russia truce
-
EU agrees long-stalled sanctions on Israeli settlers
-
Fraught marriage of Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera at heart of dreamy opera
-
Golfers ready for 'crazy' Aronimink greens at PGA
-
After backlash, Mexico cancels plan to cut school year for World Cup
-
Dubai Health and AGFA HealthCare Mark 20 Years of Collaboration Supporting Dubai's Healthcare System
-
MD-11, aircraft in fatal crash, cleared for US flight once more
-
England's sizzling Fitzpatricks seek major glory at PGA
-
Leeds draw leaves Spurs in relegation peril
-
Microsoft boss 'proud' of profit-making OpenAI investment
-
Indie series 'Everyone Is Doing Great' returns... on Netflix
-
EU to invite Taliban officials to Brussels for migrant return talks
-
Leeds draw leaves Spurs deep in relegation peril
-
Napoli's Champions League spot in balance after last-gasp Bologna defeat
-
Curacao World Cup preparations rocked as coach resigns
Amber Heard appealing verdict in Depp defamation trial
Actress Amber Heard is appealing the jury verdict in the multi-million dollar defamation case she lost to her former husband, "Pirates of the Caribbean" star Johnny Depp.
Lawyers for the 36-year-old Heard, who starred in the movie "Aquaman," filed a notice of appeal on Thursday with the Virginia Court of Appeals.
"We believe the court made errors that prevented a just and fair verdict consistent with the First Amendment," a spokesperson for Heard said in a reference to the constitutional amendment protecting free speech.
"We are therefore appealing the verdict," they said in a statement.
"While we realize today's filing will ignite the Twitter bonfires, there are steps we need to take to ensure both fairness and justice."
A Virginia jury in June awarded $10 million in damages to Depp after finding that a 2018 newspaper column penned by Heard was defamatory.
The 59-year-old Depp sued Heard over a Washington Post op-ed in which she did not name him, but described herself as a "public figure representing domestic abuse."
Heard, who counter-sued, was awarded $2 million.
The jury reached the verdict after an intense six-week trial riding on bitterly contested allegations of domestic abuse.
The case, live-streamed to millions, featured lurid and intimate details about the Hollywood celebrities' private lives.
Earlier this month, a judge rejected Heard's demand for a new trial -- sought on grounds that one of the seven jurors was not the man summoned for jury service but his son, in a case of mistaken identity.
Heard's lawyers had asked Penney Azcarate, the judge who presided over the trial, to set aside the jury verdict and declare a mistrial, but she denied the request.
L.E.Campos--PC