-
'Big-game' Bellingham shows his worth for England at World Cup
-
New Zealand's Henry rocks England in 2nd Test after Phillips century
-
Vance warns Israel against criticizing US-Iran deal
-
Iran's supreme leader says approved deal as US lifts ports blockade
-
Australian qualifier Hijikata shocks Lehecka at Queen's Club
-
AI-generated videos use Down syndrome to make sales
-
O'Brien's royal century reward for sacrificing all for racing
-
Spurs sign Dutch defender Van Hecke from Brighton
-
England great Botham slams Stokes for breaking curfew
-
Liverpool agree deal to sign Spain forward Munoz from Osasuna
-
Chivu extends Inter deal until 2028 after debut season double triumph
-
New Zealand's Henry rocks England after Phillips century
-
Ghana pushes for concrete slavery reparations
-
Wildcard Eala shocks Rybakina in Berlin
-
Robertson and Scotland eye World Cup history against Morocco
-
South Africa hold Czechs, keep World Cup knockout dream alive
-
Joyful New York celebrates Knicks with ticker-tape parade
-
Important or selfish? World Cup evidence mounts against Ronaldo
-
Europe risks 'total irrelevance' without sovereign tech: Cohere chief
-
Ex-presidents, stars, but no Trump, turn out for Obama Center
-
Vance defends Iran deal, eyes Swiss talks
-
US Olympic athlete Simpson shows 'improvement' after collasing on track
-
Wahi granted Canadian visa for Ivory Coast World Cup match after delay
-
Israel FM cuts contact with EU top diplomat over 'apartheid' remarks
-
US lifts Iran ports blockade as uncertainty clouds Swiss Iran talks
-
Brazilian police probe senator close to Lula
-
Brutal Shinnecock winds blow away US Open contenders
-
Leverkusen sign Portuguese talent Moreira from Lyon
-
AI-generated videos wield Down syndrome to make sales
-
Suspected jihadists stage deadly new attack on Niger airport
-
Man dies, trains and classes disrupted as heatwave hits France
-
Oil sinks on Mideast deal, but Fed outlook knocks equities
-
Neymar to miss Brazil's second World Cup game against Haiti
-
Dupont to start for Toulouse in Top 14 semi, Ramos out
-
O'Brien's historic 100th Royal Ascot winner has golden glow
-
Zverev wins all-German duel with Hanfmann to reach Halle quarters
-
Graft probe into Spanish ex-PM expanded to daughters
-
Iran war leaves Islamic republic intact and opponents divided
-
Gregoire wins Swiss tour 2nd stage as Pogacar extends lead
-
Galthie confirms Edwards to exit in France rugby coaching shake-up
-
What Real Madrid's new signings add to Mourinho's project
-
Knicks celebrate NBA win with huge New York parade
-
Foreign aid cuts push up migrant flows, IOM chief warns
-
Sana will become first Pakistani woman to play in The Hundred
-
Oil tankers pass Hormuz Strait after war deal: tracker
-
Cuba leader admits 'urgent changes' needed to overcome crisis
-
Labour rival eyes win in poll key to UK PM's fate
-
Haiti's World Cup return lifts community in New York
-
McIlroy grabs early lead at fog-hit US Open
-
Trump's Iran deal sparks anger among Republican hawks
Austria set to vote on headscarf ban in schools
Austrian lawmakers on Thursday are expected to approve a law banning headscarves in schools for girls under 14, a move rights groups and experts say is discriminatory and could deepen societal division.
Austria's conservative-led government -- under pressure at a time when anti-immigration sentiment is running high -- proposed the ban earlier this year. They argue it is to protect girls "from oppression".
In 2019, when the country introduced a ban on headscarves in primary schools, the constitutional court struck it down, calling it unconstitutional and discriminatory. This time however, the government insists that its law is constitutional.
The law, if passed, would prevent girls younger than 14 from wearing headscarves that "cover the head in accordance with Islamic traditions" in all schools.
"When a girl... is told that she must hide her body... to protect herself from the gaze of men, it's not a religious ritual, but oppression," Integration Minister Claudia Plakolm said when presenting the bill.
The ban, which applies to "all forms" of the Islamic veil including hijabs and burqas, would take full effect with the start of the new school year in September, Plakolm said.
From February, an initial period would be launched during which the new rules would be explained to educators, parents and children with no penalties for breaking them.
But for repeated non-compliance, parents would face fines ranging from 150 to 800 euros ($175-930).
The government said that about 12,000 girls would be affected by the new law, basing its figures on a 2019 study that showed that approximately 3,000 girls aged below 14 wore a headscarf six years ago.
- 'Stigmatised' -
Rights organisations have criticised the bill, including Amnesty International Austria.
Amnesty said it "constitutes blatant discrimination against Muslim girls" and described it as an "expression of anti-Muslim racism".
Such measures risk "fuelling existing prejudices and stereotypes against Muslims", the group warned.
The draft law has also drawn criticism from the IGGOe, the body officially recognised as representing the country's Muslim communities.
It said the ban "jeopardises social cohesion", saying "instead of empowering children, they are stigmatised and marginalised".
Angelika Atzinger, managing director of the Amazone women's rights association, said a headscarf ban "sends girls the message that decisions are being made about their bodies and that this is legitimate".
Her comments appeared in a statement published by the anti-racism group SOS Mitmensch, which also opposes the proposed law.
Austria's anti-immigration, far-right Freedom Party (FPOe), which won last year's general election but failed to form a government, said the ban did not go far enough. They want it extended to all students, teachers and other staff.
The governing coalition said it was confident the revised ban would not be overturned a second time.
It argued that the law provides for such restrictions if the rights of a child, which are enshrined in the constitution, would otherwise be infringed upon.
But constitutional law expert Heinz Mayer has raised doubts that a ban can be constitutional, recalling the top court's ruling in 2020, which found that "one religion was being discriminated against".
It also ruled that "if the headscarf is a symbol of oppression", a ban puts children in "an uncomfortable situation", but not the people who impose it on them, he told AFP.
In France, authorities banned school children in 2004 from wearing "signs or outfits by which students ostensibly show a religious affiliation" -- such as headscarves, turbans or Jewish skullcaps -- on the basis of the country's secular laws, which are meant to guarantee neutrality in state institutions.
A.Seabra--PC