-
Switch 2 sales boost Nintendo results but chip shortage looms
-
From rations to G20's doorstep: Poland savours economic 'miracle'
-
Russia resumes strikes on freezing Ukrainian capital
-
'Way too far': Latino Trump voters shocked by Minneapolis crackdown
-
England and Brook seek redemption at T20 World Cup
-
Coach Gambhir under pressure as India aim for back-to-back T20 triumphs
-
'Helmets off': NFL stars open up as Super Bowl circus begins
-
Japan coach Jones says 'fair' World Cup schedule helps small teams
-
Do not write Ireland off as a rugby force, says ex-prop Ross
-
Winter Olympics 2026: AFP guide to Alpine Skiing races
-
Winter Olympics to showcase Italian venues and global tensions
-
Buoyant England eager to end Franco-Irish grip on Six Nations
-
China to ban hidden car door handles in industry shift
-
Sengun leads Rockets past Pacers, Ball leads Hornets fightback
-
Waymo raises $16 bn to fuel global robotaxi expansion
-
Netflix to livestream BTS comeback concert in K-pop mega event
-
Rural India powers global AI models
-
Equities, metals, oil rebound after Asia-wide rout
-
Bencic, Svitolina make history as mothers inside tennis top 10
-
Italy's spread-out Olympics face transport challenge
-
Son of Norway crown princess stands trial for multiple rapes
-
Side hustle: Part-time refs take charge of Super Bowl
-
Paying for a selfie: Rome starts charging for Trevi Fountain
-
Faced with Trump, Pope Leo opts for indirect diplomacy
-
NFL chief expects Bad Bunny to unite Super Bowl audience
-
Australia's Hazlewood to miss start of T20 World Cup
-
Bill, Hillary Clinton to testify in US House Epstein probe
-
Cuba confirms 'communications' with US, but says no negotiations yet
-
From 'watch his ass' to White House talks for Trump and Petro
-
Trump says not 'ripping' down Kennedy Center -- much
-
Sunderland rout 'childish' Burnley
-
Musk merges xAI into SpaceX in bid to build space data centers
-
Former France striker Benzema switches Saudi clubs
-
Sunderland rout hapless Burnley
-
Costa Rican president-elect looks to Bukele for help against crime
-
Hosts Australia to open Rugby World Cup against Hong Kong
-
New York records 13 cold-related deaths since late January
-
In post-Maduro Venezuela, pro- and anti-government workers march for better pay
-
Romero slams 'disgraceful' Spurs squad depth
-
Trump says India, US strike trade deal
-
Cuban tourism in crisis; visitors repelled by fuel, power shortages
-
Liverpool set for Jacquet deal, Palace sign Strand Larsen on deadline day
-
FIFA president Infantino defends giving peace prize to Trump
-
Trump cuts India tariffs, says Modi will stop buying Russian oil
-
Borthwick backs Itoje to get 'big roar' off the bench against Wales
-
Twenty-one friends from Belgian village win €123mn jackpot
-
Mateta move to Milan scuppered by medical concerns: source
-
Late-January US snowstorm wasn't historically exceptional: NOAA
-
Punctuality at Germany's crisis-hit railway slumps
-
Halt to MSF work will be 'catastrophic' for people of Gaza: MSF chief
Austria set to vote on headscarf ban in schools
Austrian lawmakers on Thursday are expected to approve a law banning headscarves in schools for girls under 14, a move rights groups and experts say is discriminatory and could deepen societal division.
Austria's conservative-led government -- under pressure at a time when anti-immigration sentiment is running high -- proposed the ban earlier this year. They argue it is to protect girls "from oppression".
In 2019, when the country introduced a ban on headscarves in primary schools, the constitutional court struck it down, calling it unconstitutional and discriminatory. This time however, the government insists that its law is constitutional.
The law, if passed, would prevent girls younger than 14 from wearing headscarves that "cover the head in accordance with Islamic traditions" in all schools.
"When a girl... is told that she must hide her body... to protect herself from the gaze of men, it's not a religious ritual, but oppression," Integration Minister Claudia Plakolm said when presenting the bill.
The ban, which applies to "all forms" of the Islamic veil including hijabs and burqas, would take full effect with the start of the new school year in September, Plakolm said.
From February, an initial period would be launched during which the new rules would be explained to educators, parents and children with no penalties for breaking them.
But for repeated non-compliance, parents would face fines ranging from 150 to 800 euros ($175-930).
The government said that about 12,000 girls would be affected by the new law, basing its figures on a 2019 study that showed that approximately 3,000 girls aged below 14 wore a headscarf six years ago.
- 'Stigmatised' -
Rights organisations have criticised the bill, including Amnesty International Austria.
Amnesty said it "constitutes blatant discrimination against Muslim girls" and described it as an "expression of anti-Muslim racism".
Such measures risk "fuelling existing prejudices and stereotypes against Muslims", the group warned.
The draft law has also drawn criticism from the IGGOe, the body officially recognised as representing the country's Muslim communities.
It said the ban "jeopardises social cohesion", saying "instead of empowering children, they are stigmatised and marginalised".
Angelika Atzinger, managing director of the Amazone women's rights association, said a headscarf ban "sends girls the message that decisions are being made about their bodies and that this is legitimate".
Her comments appeared in a statement published by the anti-racism group SOS Mitmensch, which also opposes the proposed law.
Austria's anti-immigration, far-right Freedom Party (FPOe), which won last year's general election but failed to form a government, said the ban did not go far enough. They want it extended to all students, teachers and other staff.
The governing coalition said it was confident the revised ban would not be overturned a second time.
It argued that the law provides for such restrictions if the rights of a child, which are enshrined in the constitution, would otherwise be infringed upon.
But constitutional law expert Heinz Mayer has raised doubts that a ban can be constitutional, recalling the top court's ruling in 2020, which found that "one religion was being discriminated against".
It also ruled that "if the headscarf is a symbol of oppression", a ban puts children in "an uncomfortable situation", but not the people who impose it on them, he told AFP.
In France, authorities banned school children in 2004 from wearing "signs or outfits by which students ostensibly show a religious affiliation" -- such as headscarves, turbans or Jewish skullcaps -- on the basis of the country's secular laws, which are meant to guarantee neutrality in state institutions.
A.Seabra--PC