-
NZ boxer Parker promises ring return after doping ban 'lifted'
-
Reusser holds lead as Vollering wins in Tour de France hills
-
Disney profits top estimates on strength in theme park business
-
Argentina's Albornoz hit with four-game ban for 'intimidatory' referee abuse
-
LIV Golf CEO says funding secured to play beyond 2026
-
Guatemala volcano eruption eases off, but alert remains in place
-
Stocks stall tracking earnings, oil dips on Iran-Oman Hormuz move
-
Baby hippo descended from Escobar's herd rescued in Colombia
-
Tuipulotu to lead New Zealand in South African tour opener
-
Woman arrested after four men stabbed in central London
-
Leftist Democrat urges unity after victory in Michigan
-
Celtic boss O'Neill in hospital after 'small procedure'
-
Austria, Slovakia hit new temperature records
-
Israeli forces raid Palestinian refugee camp near Jerusalem
-
Where mountain lions roam, fewer deer in the headlights
-
Explosive drone found near Ukrainian plane at German airport
-
Alonso hails 'emotional' Mudryk return in 1-0 loss to Juventus
-
Leftist Democrat wins stunning primary victory in crucial Michigan
-
Embattled FIFA chief Infantino in emergency talks, suffers Figo blow
-
Inter Milan and AC Milan battle to 1-1 draw in Perth friendly
-
Mudryk back for Chelsea in friendly defeat to Juventus
-
Butterflies seek new habitats as climate changes: study
-
Alarm as explosive drone found near Ukrainian plane at German airport
-
'Deceitful' Infantino 'must go' says Luis Figo
-
Infantino and the failed deal affair -- What they said
-
ヌーシャ・オーベル:彼女はポツダムの抱える問題に対処できるのか?
-
नूशा ऑबेल: क्या वह पॉट्सडैम की समस्याओं से निपटने के लिए तैयार हैं?
-
누샤 오벨: 그녀가 포츠담의 문제들을 해결할 수 있을까?
-
努莎·奧貝爾:她能否應對波茨坦面臨的問題?
-
Нооша Аубель: Сможет ли она справиться с проблемами Потсдама?
-
Нооша Аубель: Чи зможе вона впоратися з проблемами Потсдама?
-
Noosha Aubel: Is she up to the task of tackling Potsdam’s problems?
-
Stocks mostly rise tracking earnings, US-Iran hopes
-
Alarm at German airport after drone found near Ukrainian plane, mid-air incident
-
Pakistan team reaches base camp with body of renowned climber killed in avalanche
-
Salah arrives in Turkey for Trabzonspor talks
-
Ceuta warns of 'unsustainable' situation for child migrants after influx
-
Embattled FIFA chief Infantino holds emergency talks with directors
-
SpaceX rocket stage believed to have slammed into Moon
-
Russian barrage on Kyiv kills 17 as Ukraine fails to down single missile
-
India monsoon floods, landslides kill more than 100 since July: officials
-
'Lost': Migrants despair after Britain expels them back to France
-
South Korea pro baseball league cancels games over heatwave
-
Cathay Pacific's profit soars 71% despite Iran war driving up fuel costs
-
Taiwan probes 17 China-funded firms over high-tech talent poaching
-
Russian barrage on Ukraine kills 15, wounds dozens more
-
Trump warns Iran to open Hormuz or get 'hit very hard'
-
South Korea police raid Starbucks HQ over 'Tank Day' fiasco
-
Factories shed workers in Bangladesh garment sector
-
Tech back in fashion as Asian markets extend rebound
US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors
The US Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a state law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors -– an issue at the heart of the American culture wars.
The court voted 6-3 to uphold a Tennessee law barring hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for those under the age of 18.
The six conservative justices on the top court rejected a challenge to the law while the three liberals dissented.
Two dozen Republican-led states have enacted laws restricting medical care for transgender youth, and the case will have repercussions for the prohibitions across the country.
"This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the majority opinion.
"The Court's role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' (of the law) but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees," Roberts said.
"It does not. Questions regarding the law's policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process."
The Supreme Court heard the case in December and the Justice Department of then-president Joe Biden joined opponents of the law, arguing that it violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause since it denies transgender minors access to medical treatments permitted to others.
Republican President Donald Trump has since taken office and he signed an executive order in January restricting gender transition procedures for people under the age of 19.
While there is no US-wide law against gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender youth, the Trump order ended any federal backing for such procedures.
Reacting to the ruling, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said it "sets a dangerous precedent for legislative interference in the practice of medicine."
"Gender-affirming care is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria and is backed by decades of peer-reviewed research, clinical experience, and scientific consensus," the AAP said.
"Denying patients access to this care not only undermines their health and safety, it robs them of basic human dignity."
- 'Must end' -
The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group, welcomed the ruling as a "huge win for children" and a "step toward ending dangerous experiments on kids."
During oral arguments in December, Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice told the court the law was designed to "protect minors from risky, unproven medical interventions" with "often irreversible and life-altering consequences."
Chase Strangio, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing three transgender adolescents, their parents, and a Memphis-based doctor, countered that the law has "taken away the only treatment that relieved years of suffering."
"What they've done is impose a blunderbuss ban, overriding the very careful judgment of parents who love and care for their children and the doctors who have recommended the treatment," said Strangio, the first openly transgender lawyer to argue before the court.
Trump, in his inauguration speech, said his government would henceforth only recognize two genders -- male and female -- and he issued his executive order a week later restricting gender transition procedures for minors.
"Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children," the executive order said. "This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation's history, and it must end."
Trump's order said it would now be US policy that it would "not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another."
The order bars funding for gender transition under the Medicaid health insurance program for poor families, the Medicare scheme used by retirees, and Defense Department health insurance that covers some two million children.
According to a study by UCLA's Williams Institute, an estimated 1.6 million people aged 13 and older in the United States identify as transgender.
P.Queiroz--PC