-
Matthews latest England World Cup-winner out of Women's Six Nations
-
Race to find port for cruise ship battling deadly rodent virus
-
Celtic's O'Neill says Hearts' rise good for Scottish football
-
Ethiopia and Sudan accuse each other of attacks
-
Injured Mbappe faces backlash over Sardinia trip before Clasico
-
Vodafone to take full ownership of UK mobile operator
-
Stocks advance, oil falls as traders eye US-Iran ceasefire
-
Sabalenka ready to boycott Grand Slams over prize money
-
Boko Haram attack on Chad army base kills at least 24: military, local officials
-
US trade gap widens in March as AI spending boosts imports
-
US threatens 'devastating' response to any Iran attack on shipping
-
Murphy warns snooker hopefuls to 'work harder' to match Chinese stars
-
Race to find port for hantavirus-stricken cruise ship
-
Romanian pro-EU PM loses no-confidence motion
-
Edin Terzic to become Athletic Bilbao coach next season
-
Borthwick backed by RFU to take England to 2027 Rugby World Cup
-
EU hails 'leap forward' in ties with Russia's ally Armenia
-
German car-ramming suspect had mental health problems: reports
-
Pyongyang calling: North Korea shows off own-brand phones
-
Iran warns 'not even started' in Hormuz
-
World body in dark over allegations against China badminton chief
-
Asian stocks drop amid fears over US-Iran ceasefire
-
China fireworks factory explosion kills 26, injures 61
-
China hails 'our era' as Wu Yize's world snooker triumph goes viral
-
Ex-model accuses French scout of grooming her for Epstein
-
Timberwolves eclipse Spurs as Knicks rout Sixers
-
Taiwan leader says island has 'right to engage with the world'
-
Yoko says oh no to 'John Lemon' beer
-
Bayern's Kompany promises repeat fireworks in PSG Champions League semi
-
A coaching great? Luis Enrique has PSG on brink of another Champions League final
-
Top five moments from the Met Gala
-
Brunson leads Knicks in rout of Sixers
-
Retiring great Sophie Devine wants New Zealand back playing Tests
-
Ukraine pressures Russia as midnight ceasefire looms
-
Stocks sink amid fears over US-Iran ceasefire
-
G7 trade ministers set to meet but not discuss latest US tariff threat
-
Sherlock Holmes fans recreate fateful duel at Swiss falls
-
Premier League losses soar for clubs locked in 'arms race'
-
'Spreading like wildfire': Fiji grapples with soaring HIV cases
-
For Israel's Circassians, food and language sustain an ancient heritage
-
'Super El Nino' raises fears for Asia reeling from Middle East conflict
-
Trouble in paradise: Colombia tourist jewel plagued by violence
-
Death toll in Brazil small plane crash rises to three
-
Pulitzers honor damning coverage of Trump and his policies
-
Lawline Exits Beta and Launches Full AI Legal Platform for Businesses and Individuals
-
Digi Power X Signs AI Colocation Agreement with Leading AI Compute Company for 40 MW Data Center in Columbiana, Alabama
-
Camino Appointments Senior Management to Build and Operate the Puquios Copper Mine in Chile and for Corporate Development
-
LA fire suspect had grudge against wealthy: prosecutors
-
US-Iran ceasefire on brink as UAE reports attacks
-
Stars shine at Met Gala, fashion's biggest night
US to remove warnings from menopause hormone therapy
The US health regulatory agency on Monday said it would direct manufacturers to remove a bold warning on many hormone therapies used to alleviate menopausal symptoms, saying the risks have been exaggerated.
Hormone Replacement Therapy can be taken to replace estrogen that the body stops producing during menopause -- the natural process that ends female reproductive years -- with the aim of alleviating symptoms that can be physically and mentally debilitating including hot flashes, brain fog, insomnia, night sweats, joint pain and bone loss.
It once was used routinely, but a major 2002 study that was aimed at exploring how the therapies could prevent chronic disease pointed to risks associated with specific HRT formulations.
Since then "black box warnings" -- the strongest warning the US Food and Drug Administration can require on prescription drugs -- have sounded alarm over increased HRT risks including of certain cancers, cardiovascular conditions and probable dementia.
Prescription and use of the therapies over recent decades plummeted.
But the matter remains one of debate, and critics have pointed to flaws with the early-2000s study, whose trials were halted as risks appeared: namely it focused on women who were on average a decade-post menopause and in their 60s, when cardiovascular risks increase regardless.
Today guidance generally indicates that newly menopausal or perimenopausal women -- broadly in their late 40s or 50s -- are potential candidates for treatment.
There also are newer, more localized or lower-dose forms of the therapies available.
"We're challenging outdated thinking and recommitting to evidence-based medicine that empowers rather than restricts," US health chief Robert F. Kennedy Jr said in introducing the measure.
- More nuance -
Many members of the medical community have urged revisiting the label, which they say can scare women for whom benefits may outweigh risks.
Others have voiced concern that changes shouldn't come without a transparent review process that convenes independent experts.
FDA head Marty Makary dismissed that notion in a Monday briefing, saying such committees are "bureaucratic, long, often conflicted and very expensive.
"People have felt demoralized in this field. We've made almost no progress in assessing the evidence for years."
FDA officials have emphasized the new label will provide for more nuanced discussion between patients and doctors in evaluating whether HRT can be right for individuals.
Typically women in a low-risk category have healthy vitals including weight and blood pressure as well as normal-range cholesterol levels, with no history or a lower risk of developing breast cancer. They are also within the first 10 years of beginning menopause.
The president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Steven Fleischman, commended the FDA's move, saying "the updated labels will better allow patients and clinicians to engage in a shared decision-making process."
Fleischman said in a statement the change would not shift the ACOG's guidance on estrogen therapy, but noted it was important to distinguish between systemic estrogen products -- including methods taken orally or via patches -- and low-dose vaginal estrogen.
"Like all medications, systemic estrogen products are not without risk, and their use should be based on an individualized conversation between patients and their clinicians," the health association said.
The FDA said it is not seeking to remove the boxed warning for endometrial cancer for systemic estrogen-alone products.
C.Cassis--PC