-
World Cup warning with Sweden star Isak 'getting stronger and stronger'
-
'Like China': Cubans welcome reforms but exiles remain skeptical
-
Tunisia coach says 'I am no wizard' after World Cup SOS call
-
USA down Australia to reach World Cup knockout rounds
-
USA beat Australia 2-0 to reach World Cup knockouts
-
Imperious Dupont guides record-breaking Toulouse to Top 14 final
-
Qatar-gifted Air Force One replacement unveiled
-
Venezuelan opposition figure heads to US after transition talks
-
Niemann fires 65 at US Open after upsetting two-shot penalty
-
Canada star Kone to miss rest of World Cup after surgery: team
-
Spain's Yamal says 'too soon' to play full match at World Cup
-
Confident Fitzpatrick makes a run at another US Open title
-
Neymar? He is working remotely at the World Cup, jokes Lula
-
England captain Stokes strikes for Durham as Test recall looms
-
Three-time Stanley Cup champion Toews retires
-
Clark wants to win back fans as well as US Open title
-
Japan wary of fired up and wounded Tunisia for World Cup landmark game
-
Clark leads as fellow major winners charge at US Open
-
'Like a fridge': France cave homes offer lucky few respite from heat
-
Ton-up Nicholls turns the screw for New Zealand against England
-
Hormuz ship traffic climbs after war deal: trackers
-
Sun shines on jockey Lee at Royal Ascot
-
Kane hails World Cup 'Wonderwall' singalong as England highlight
-
Sabalenka roars back to make Berlin WTA semis
-
Europe swelters as more heat records set to tumble
-
Narvaez takes Swiss Tour third stage after 100km breakaway
-
'There's no soul': Tony Leung weighs in on AI in filmmaking
-
Europe swelters as temperature records tumble
-
From Versailles to a Swiss mountain: a week of dizzying Iran diplomacy
-
French mountain lodges worry over strained water supply
-
Coach tells S. Korea to move on fast with World Cup knockouts in reach
-
Heatwave hits more than one in two people in France
-
Henry strikes as New Zealand strengthen grip against England
-
Zverev sets up Fritz semi at Halle Open
-
England captain Stokes in action for Durham as Test recall looms
-
Clark stumbles but still leads by two at US Open
-
Moutet fined over x-rated Queen's Club rant
-
Ogura pulls off stunner to top Czech MotoGP practices
-
Outrage in Italy after Trump says Meloni 'begged' for photo op
-
Turkey bars public World Cup screening over university entrance exam
-
From birds to fish, how extreme heat causes wildlife to suffer
-
Ebola spreading 'fast' in DR Congo, warns WHO
-
Trapped on Everest for days, Nepali survivor recounts escape
-
The Sun may not engulf Earth after all, scientists say
-
Clark leads by three as US Open second round begins
-
Russia signals slower rate cuts amid high Ukraine war spending
-
Fritz gets revenge on Shelton to reach Halle semis
-
Henry strikes as New Zealand lead England by 100 runs in 2nd Test
-
Heatwave hits more than half of France's population
-
Online threats, insults fuel S.Africa's anti-foreigner hate
US to remove warnings from menopause hormone therapy
The US health regulatory agency on Monday said it would direct manufacturers to remove a bold warning on many hormone therapies used to alleviate menopausal symptoms, saying the risks have been exaggerated.
Hormone Replacement Therapy can be taken to replace estrogen that the body stops producing during menopause -- the natural process that ends female reproductive years -- with the aim of alleviating symptoms that can be physically and mentally debilitating including hot flashes, brain fog, insomnia, night sweats, joint pain and bone loss.
It once was used routinely, but a major 2002 study that was aimed at exploring how the therapies could prevent chronic disease pointed to risks associated with specific HRT formulations.
Since then "black box warnings" -- the strongest warning the US Food and Drug Administration can require on prescription drugs -- have sounded alarm over increased HRT risks including of certain cancers, cardiovascular conditions and probable dementia.
Prescription and use of the therapies over recent decades plummeted.
But the matter remains one of debate, and critics have pointed to flaws with the early-2000s study, whose trials were halted as risks appeared: namely it focused on women who were on average a decade-post menopause and in their 60s, when cardiovascular risks increase regardless.
Today guidance generally indicates that newly menopausal or perimenopausal women -- broadly in their late 40s or 50s -- are potential candidates for treatment.
There also are newer, more localized or lower-dose forms of the therapies available.
"We're challenging outdated thinking and recommitting to evidence-based medicine that empowers rather than restricts," US health chief Robert F. Kennedy Jr said in introducing the measure.
- More nuance -
Many members of the medical community have urged revisiting the label, which they say can scare women for whom benefits may outweigh risks.
Others have voiced concern that changes shouldn't come without a transparent review process that convenes independent experts.
FDA head Marty Makary dismissed that notion in a Monday briefing, saying such committees are "bureaucratic, long, often conflicted and very expensive.
"People have felt demoralized in this field. We've made almost no progress in assessing the evidence for years."
FDA officials have emphasized the new label will provide for more nuanced discussion between patients and doctors in evaluating whether HRT can be right for individuals.
Typically women in a low-risk category have healthy vitals including weight and blood pressure as well as normal-range cholesterol levels, with no history or a lower risk of developing breast cancer. They are also within the first 10 years of beginning menopause.
The president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Steven Fleischman, commended the FDA's move, saying "the updated labels will better allow patients and clinicians to engage in a shared decision-making process."
Fleischman said in a statement the change would not shift the ACOG's guidance on estrogen therapy, but noted it was important to distinguish between systemic estrogen products -- including methods taken orally or via patches -- and low-dose vaginal estrogen.
"Like all medications, systemic estrogen products are not without risk, and their use should be based on an individualized conversation between patients and their clinicians," the health association said.
The FDA said it is not seeking to remove the boxed warning for endometrial cancer for systemic estrogen-alone products.
C.Cassis--PC