-
Mudryk back for Chelsea in friendly defeat to Juventus
-
Butterflies seek new habitats as climate changes: study
-
Alarm as explosive drone found near Ukrainian plane at German airport
-
'Deceitful' Infantino 'must go' says Luis Figo
-
Infantino and the failed deal affair -- What they said
-
ヌーシャ・オーベル:彼女はポツダムの抱える問題に対処できるのか?
-
누샤 오벨: 그녀가 포츠담의 문제들을 해결할 수 있을까?
-
努莎·奧貝爾:她能否應對波茨坦面臨的問題?
-
नूशा ऑबेल: क्या वह पॉट्सडैम की समस्याओं से निपटने के लिए तैयार हैं?
-
Нооша Аубель: Чи зможе вона впоратися з проблемами Потсдама?
-
Нооша Аубель: Сможет ли она справиться с проблемами Потсдама?
-
Noosha Aubel: Is she up to the task of tackling Potsdam’s problems?
-
Stocks mostly rise tracking earnings, US-Iran hopes
-
Alarm at German airport after drone found near Ukrainian plane, mid-air incident
-
Pakistan team reaches base camp with body of renowned climber killed in avalanche
-
Salah arrives in Turkey for Trabzonspor talks
-
Ceuta warns of 'unsustainable' situation for child migrants after influx
-
Embattled FIFA chief Infantino holds emergency talks with directors
-
SpaceX rocket stage believed to have slammed into Moon
-
Russian barrage on Kyiv kills 17 as Ukraine fails to down single missile
-
India monsoon floods, landslides kill more than 100 since July: officials
-
'Lost': Migrants despair after Britain expels them back to France
-
South Korea pro baseball league cancels games over heatwave
-
Cathay Pacific's profit soars 71% despite Iran war driving up fuel costs
-
Taiwan probes 17 China-funded firms over high-tech talent poaching
-
Russian barrage on Ukraine kills 15, wounds dozens more
-
Trump warns Iran to open Hormuz or get 'hit very hard'
-
South Korea police raid Starbucks HQ over 'Tank Day' fiasco
-
Factories shed workers in Bangladesh garment sector
-
Tech back in fashion as Asian markets extend rebound
-
North Korea warns of 'military options' over Japan rearmament
-
Total eclipse gives scientists chance to probe Sun's mysteries
-
Tiny light, big dream: Harvesting power from soil in Japan
-
What to know about the total solar eclipse on August 12
-
Trump admin to review 'closed' AI models before release: reports
-
'Like the end of the world': the eclipse chasers flocking to Spain
-
De Minaur fights past Duckworth in all-Aussie Montreal battle
-
Taiwan begins military drills as China pressure grows
-
High bills, cheap panels drive a Philippine solar surge
-
UK mansion where 'listeners' spied on Nazi generals becomes museum
-
Russian barrage on Ukraine kills 2, wounds dozens more
-
Sabalenka tops Uchijima in WTA Toronto opener
-
RE Royalties Announces Third Investment in Solaris Energy's Portfolio and Letter of Intent for Expanded Royalty Partnership for a Further US$62.7 Million
-
Alcaraz withdraws from Cincinnati Masters with wrist injury
-
Kgatlana strikes as South Africa reach WAFCON quarter-finals
-
SpaceX revenue jumps 92% in first earnings report, but shares slide
-
Pakistan close on series-levelling win against West Indies
-
US eyes Hormuz deal 'today or tomorrow' as ship sinks in Red Sea
-
Paramount CEO says politics fueling Warner Bros. merger battle
-
SpaceX revenue jumps 92% in first earnings report
US to remove warnings from menopause hormone therapy
The US health regulatory agency on Monday said it would direct manufacturers to remove a bold warning on many hormone therapies used to alleviate menopausal symptoms, saying the risks have been exaggerated.
Hormone Replacement Therapy can be taken to replace estrogen that the body stops producing during menopause -- the natural process that ends female reproductive years -- with the aim of alleviating symptoms that can be physically and mentally debilitating including hot flashes, brain fog, insomnia, night sweats, joint pain and bone loss.
It once was used routinely, but a major 2002 study that was aimed at exploring how the therapies could prevent chronic disease pointed to risks associated with specific HRT formulations.
Since then "black box warnings" -- the strongest warning the US Food and Drug Administration can require on prescription drugs -- have sounded alarm over increased HRT risks including of certain cancers, cardiovascular conditions and probable dementia.
Prescription and use of the therapies over recent decades plummeted.
But the matter remains one of debate, and critics have pointed to flaws with the early-2000s study, whose trials were halted as risks appeared: namely it focused on women who were on average a decade-post menopause and in their 60s, when cardiovascular risks increase regardless.
Today guidance generally indicates that newly menopausal or perimenopausal women -- broadly in their late 40s or 50s -- are potential candidates for treatment.
There also are newer, more localized or lower-dose forms of the therapies available.
"We're challenging outdated thinking and recommitting to evidence-based medicine that empowers rather than restricts," US health chief Robert F. Kennedy Jr said in introducing the measure.
- More nuance -
Many members of the medical community have urged revisiting the label, which they say can scare women for whom benefits may outweigh risks.
Others have voiced concern that changes shouldn't come without a transparent review process that convenes independent experts.
FDA head Marty Makary dismissed that notion in a Monday briefing, saying such committees are "bureaucratic, long, often conflicted and very expensive.
"People have felt demoralized in this field. We've made almost no progress in assessing the evidence for years."
FDA officials have emphasized the new label will provide for more nuanced discussion between patients and doctors in evaluating whether HRT can be right for individuals.
Typically women in a low-risk category have healthy vitals including weight and blood pressure as well as normal-range cholesterol levels, with no history or a lower risk of developing breast cancer. They are also within the first 10 years of beginning menopause.
The president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Steven Fleischman, commended the FDA's move, saying "the updated labels will better allow patients and clinicians to engage in a shared decision-making process."
Fleischman said in a statement the change would not shift the ACOG's guidance on estrogen therapy, but noted it was important to distinguish between systemic estrogen products -- including methods taken orally or via patches -- and low-dose vaginal estrogen.
"Like all medications, systemic estrogen products are not without risk, and their use should be based on an individualized conversation between patients and their clinicians," the health association said.
The FDA said it is not seeking to remove the boxed warning for endometrial cancer for systemic estrogen-alone products.
C.Cassis--PC