-
Maresca 'relaxed' about Chelsea's rough patch
-
France updates net-zero plan, with fossil fuel phaseout
-
Nowhere to pray as logs choke flood-hit Indonesian mosque
-
In Pakistan, 'Eternal Love' has no place on YouTube
-
England bowling great Anderson named as Lancashire captain
-
UK's King Charles to give personal TV message about cancer 'journey'
-
Fit-again Jesus can be Arsenal's number one striker, says Arteta
-
Spain's ruling Socialists face sex scandal fallout among women voters
-
EU 2035 combustion-engine ban review: what's at stake
-
Stocks rally in wake of Fed rate cut
-
Mohammed Ben Sulayem re-elected unopposed in contentious FIA election
-
Vonn claims sensational first ski World Cup win since 2018
-
French forces use tear gas to clear protesters protecting condemned cows
-
EU agrees recycled plastic targets for cars
-
UK health service hit by 'super flu' outbreak
-
Oscar-nominated #MeToo film finally screened in Japan
-
Off-field drama overshadowing Toulouse's Champions Cup tilt
-
Russian central bank says suing Euroclear over frozen assets
-
Afghan IOC member Asghari hopes Taliban dialogue spark u-turn over women's rights
-
Liverpool boss Slot to hold talks with unhappy Salah
-
Congo refugees recount death and chaos as war reignites
-
Messi to unveil 21-metre statue of himself on India 'GOAT' tour
-
Trump 'pardons' jailed US election denier
-
British porn star fined, faces imminent Bali deportation
-
Spain opens doors to descendants of Franco-era exiles
-
Indonesia floods were 'extinction level' for rare orangutans
-
Thai teacher finds 'peace amidst chaos' painting bunker murals
-
Escapism or exaltation? 'Narco-culture' games raise concern in Mexico
-
US slaps sanctions on Maduro relatives as Venezuela war fears build
-
Japan bear victim's watch shows last movements
-
South Korea exam chief quits over complaints of too-hard tests
-
Hong Kong media mogul Jimmy Lai verdict set for Monday
-
Women's rights seen as under threat as Chile heads to polls
-
Falcons edge reeling Buccaneers 29-28 in NFL
-
Son of MH370 flight victim seeks answers after 11 years
-
Mane v Mbemba: An AFCON cameo to relish in Morocco
-
Aubameyang faces familiar foes as Marseille seek title revival
-
French indie 'Clair Obscur' dominates Game Awards
-
Injury-hit Bucks down Celtics, Rockets edge Clippers
-
'Samurai Spirit': Ultra-nationalists see Japan tilting their way
-
Duffy takes 5-38 as NZ thrash West Indies for 1-0 Test series lead
-
Sax-playing pilot Anutin's short-lived Thai premiership
-
US, Japan defence chiefs say China harming regional peace
-
Federer to headline launch of 2026 Australian Open
-
Grieving families of Air India crash victims await answers
-
South Korea exam chief resigns after tests dubbed too hard
-
Asian markets track Wall St record after Fed cut
-
Duffy takes five as NZ thrash West Indies for 1-0 Test series lead
-
Laughing about science more important than ever: Ig Nobel founder
-
North Korea's Kim vows to root out 'evil', scolds lazy officials
EU 2035 combustion-engine ban review: what's at stake
The European Commission is expected to announce on Tuesday measures relaxing a 2035 ban on new petrol and diesel car sales.
While Europe's embattled auto industry and its backers have lobbied hard for Brussels to relax the ban, they are divided on exactly what measures to take.
- Why the 2035 target date? -
In 2023, despite the reluctance of Germany, the commission announced a ban on sales of new vehicles powered by internal combustion engines from 2035. Hybrids that use a combination of combustion engines and battery power are also included.
The ban is a key measure to help attain the EU's target of carbon neutrality by 2050.
The date is important as vehicles spend an average of 15 years on the road in the EU and thus would be expected to have largely stopped spewing planet-warming emissions by around 2050.
The 2023 announcement included a provision for a review in 2026 but, under pressure from carmakers and governments, the commission pushed forward announcing proposed adjustments to the end of 2025.
The proposals will go to the European Parliament for review.
- What adjustments are possible? -
For those against the ban, it's no longer just a question of shifting the 2035 date, but of relaxing certain provisions.
Carmakers would like to see continued sales authorised for hybrids with rechargeable batteries or those equipped with range extenders (small combustion engines which recharge the battery instead of powering the wheels).
Germany supports this option as do eastern European nations where German carmakers have set up factories.
The ACEA association of European carmakers doesn't criticise the goal of electrification, but it said "the 2035 CO2 targets for cars and vans are no longer realistic".
Another possible means to add some flexibility would be boosting the use of alternative fuels such as those derived from agricultural crops and waste products.
Italy supports this option.
But environmental groups are opposed to any massive turn to crop-based biofuels as it would likely boost the use of pesticides and aggravate soil depletion, and they are also sceptical about what emissions reductions can actually be achieved.
Moreover, as a majority of biofuels are imported, the EU wouldn't gain in autonomy, another objective of the shift to electric vehicles.
- Carmakers out of alignment? -
European carmakers -- BMW, Mercedes, Renault, Stellantis and VW -- are not always on the same page even if they all want the rules to be relaxed.
This is principally due to their varying progress in shifting to electric models.
The industry that has grown up around the electric car sector -- such as battery manufacturers, recharge stations and electricity companies -- wants to keep the 2035 target with no adjustments.
"Rolling back these objectives would undermine the EU’s energy sovereignty, industrial leadership, and climate credibility," said the UFE, a trade group for French electricity industry firms.
France, along with Spain and the Nordic countries, has long called for keeping to the trajectory to shift to electric vehicles in order to not harm firms that have made investments in the transition.
Paris has indicated it is open to some flexibility on the condition of local content being favoured, which pleases suppliers which have also come under intense pressure from cheaper Chinese competition.
- Is there a risk in backsliding? -
Yes, according to experts.
"What is considered a short-term advantage may not be one in the long term," said Jean-Philippe Hermine at the IDDRI think tank that focuses on the transition in the transport sector.
Bernard Jullien, an economist at the University of Bordeaux, said keeping several different technologies imposes extra costs for companies.
It can also create uncertainty for them if consumers adopt a wait-and-see attitude, he added.
"Between China and its electric vehicles and the oil that Saudi Arabia and the United States wants to sell us, is the right choice to stick with our old technology?" asked Diane Strauss, head of the French office of T&E, an advocacy group for clean transport and energy.
V.F.Barreira--PC