-
Rare mountain gorilla twins born in DR Congo: park authorities
-
Ex-midwife enthroned as first female Archbishop of Canterbury
-
AC Schnitzer: When Iconic Tuners Fall Silent
-
Senegal lodge appeal to Court of Arbitration for Sport over AFCON final decision
-
South Africa seal T20 series win in New Zealand
-
Study links major polluters to big climate damages bill
-
Ex-Google chief Matt Brittin made new BBC director-general
-
Iran likely behind attacks sowing fear among Europe's Jews: experts
-
'Relieved' McGrath claims career first crystal globe in slalom
-
US ski star Shiffrin wins overall World Cup title for sixth time
-
Trump names tech titans to science advisory council
-
Mideast war sparks long queues at Kinshasa petrol stations
-
US TV star details 'agony' over mother's disappearance
-
Tehran receives US plan to end Mideast war, as Iran fires at US carrier
-
Aviation, tourism, agriculture... the economic sectors hit by the war
-
Iran fires at US carrier as backchannel diplomacy aims to end war
-
Salah's long goodbye brings curtain down on golden era for Liverpool
-
Monaco: city of vice and a few virtues
-
AI making cyber attacks costlier and more effective: Munich Re
-
Defying Israeli bombs, Lebanese hold out in southern city of Tyre
-
War-linked power crunch pushes Sri Lanka to four-day week
-
Hungary says will phase out gas deliveries to Ukraine
-
Oil prices tumble, stocks rally on Mideast peace hopes
-
Maybach: Between Glory and a Turning Point
-
German business morale falls as war puts recovery on ice: survey
-
Labubu maker Pop Mart's shares fall 23% despite surging earnings
-
ECB won't be 'paralysed' in face of energy shock: Lagarde
-
Iran hits targets across Middle East after Trump signals talks progress
-
McEvoy says best is to come after breaking long-standing swim record
-
Goat vs gecko: A tiny Caribbean island faces wildlife showdown
-
Japan PM asks IEA chief to prepare additional 'coordinated release' of oil
-
Hungary's hard-pressed LGBTQ people say Orban exit is only half battle
-
Belarus leader visits North Korea for first time
-
'No heavier burden': the decades-long search for Kosovo war missing
-
Exotic pet trade thrives in China despite welfare concerns
-
Iran fires missile salvo after Trump signals progress in talks
-
BTS concert drew 18.4 million viewers, says Netflix
-
OSCE's 'chaotic' Ukraine evacuation put staff at risk: leaked report
-
Top WTO official sounds fertiliser warning over Middle East war
-
France and Brazil weigh up World Cup prospects in glamour friendly
-
Italy hoping to end World Cup pain as play-offs loom
-
Dirty diapers born again in Japan recycling breakthrough
-
Verstappen's Japan GP win streak under threat as Mercedes dominate
-
Crude tumbles, stocks rally on hopes for Iran war de-escalation
-
Gauff outlasts Bencic to reach Miami semi-finals
-
'Hero' Australian dog who saved 100 koalas retires
-
Underdogs chase World Cup berths in Mexico playoff tournament
-
Pope heads to tiny Catholic Monaco
-
Meet the four astronauts set to voyage around the Moon
-
Artemis 2 Moon mission: a primer
Australia ban offers test on social media harm
Australia's under-16 social media ban will make the nation a real-life laboratory on how best to tackle the technology's impact on young people, experts say.
Those in favour of the world-first December 10 ban point to a growing mass of studies that suggest too much time online takes a toll on teen wellbeing.
But opponents argue there is not enough hard proof to warrant the new legislation, which could do more harm than good.
Adolescent brains are still developing into the early 20s, said psychologist Amy Orben, who leads a digital mental health programme at the University of Cambridge.
A "huge amount" of observational research, often based on surveys, has tracked a correlation between teen tech use and worse mental health, she told AFP.
But it is hard to draw firm conclusions, because phones are so ingrained into daily life, and young people may turn to social media because they are already suffering.
"With technology, because it's changing so fast, the evidence base will always be uncertain," Orben said.
"What could change the dial are experimental studies or evaluations of natural experiments. So evaluating the Australia ban is hugely important because it actually gives us a window on what might be happening."
- No 'smoking gun' -
To try and shed light on the cause-and-effect relationship, Australian researchers are recruiting 13- to 16-year-olds for a "Connected Minds Study" to assess how the ban affects their wellbeing.
A World Health Organization survey last year found that 11 percent of adolescents struggled to control their use of social media.
Other research has shown a link between excessive social media use and poor sleep, body image, school performance and emotional distress, such as a 2019 study of US schoolchildren in JAMA Psychiatry that found those who spent over three hours a day on social media could be at heightened risk for mental health problems.
So some experts argue the right time to act is now.
"I actually don't think this is a science issue. This is a values issue," said Christian Heim, an Australian psychiatrist and clinical director of mental health.
"We're talking about things like cyberbullying, the risk of suicide, accessing sites on anorexia nervosa and self-harm," he told AFP.
Evidence of a risk is growing, Heim said -- pointing to a 2018 study by neuroscientist Christian Montag that linked addiction to the Chinese messaging app WeChat to shrinking grey matter volume in part of the brain.
"We can't wait for stronger evidence," Heim said.
Scott Griffiths of the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said a "smoking gun research study" was unlikely to emerge soon to prove the harms of social media.
But the ban was worth trying, he said.
"I'm hopeful that the major social media companies seeing this full-throated legislative action come into play will finally be motivated to more meaningfully protect the health and wellbeing of young people."
- 'Too blunt' -
More than three-quarters of Australian adults agreed with the new legislation before it passed, a poll indicated.
However, an open letter signed by more than 140 academics, campaigners and other experts cautioned that a ban would be "too blunt an instrument".
"People were saying: 'Well, kids are getting more anxious. There must be a reason -- let's ban social media'," argued one signatory, Axel Bruns, a digital media professor at Queensland University of Technology.
Children may simply have more reasons to be anxious, under pressure from pandemic-interrupted schooling and troubled by wars in Gaza and Ukraine, he told AFP.
And a ban might push some teens to more extreme, fringe sites, while preventing other marginalised young people from finding community.
Noelle Martin, an activist focused on image-based online abuse and deepfakes, feared the Australian ban would do little to help, given the country's history on enforcement of existing laws.
"I don't believe it will stop, prevent or do much to meaningfully combat this issue," Martin said.
In any case, the political decision has been taken in Australia.
"Social media is doing social harm to our children," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this year.
"There is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it."
F.Moura--PC