-
Fit-again France captain Dupont partners Jalibert against Ireland
-
French summons Musk for 'voluntary interview' as authorities raid X offices
-
IOC chief Coventry calls for focus on sport, not politics
-
McNeil's partner hits out at 'brutal' football industry after Palace move collapses
-
Proud moment as Prendergast brothers picked to start for Ireland
-
Germany has highest share of older workers in EU
-
Teen swims four hours to save family lost at sea off Australia
-
Ethiopia denies Trump claim mega-dam was financed by US
-
Russia resumes strikes on freezing Ukrainian capital ahead of talks
-
Malaysian court acquits French man on drug charges
-
Switch 2 sales boost Nintendo results but chip shortage looms
-
From rations to G20's doorstep: Poland savours economic 'miracle'
-
Russia resumes strikes on freezing Ukrainian capital
-
'Way too far': Latino Trump voters shocked by Minneapolis crackdown
-
England and Brook seek redemption at T20 World Cup
-
Coach Gambhir under pressure as India aim for back-to-back T20 triumphs
-
'Helmets off': NFL stars open up as Super Bowl circus begins
-
Japan coach Jones says 'fair' World Cup schedule helps small teams
-
Do not write Ireland off as a rugby force, says ex-prop Ross
-
Winter Olympics 2026: AFP guide to Alpine Skiing races
-
Winter Olympics to showcase Italian venues and global tensions
-
Buoyant England eager to end Franco-Irish grip on Six Nations
-
China to ban hidden car door handles in industry shift
-
Sengun leads Rockets past Pacers, Ball leads Hornets fightback
-
Waymo raises $16 bn to fuel global robotaxi expansion
-
Netflix to livestream BTS comeback concert in K-pop mega event
-
Rural India powers global AI models
-
Equities, metals, oil rebound after Asia-wide rout
-
Bencic, Svitolina make history as mothers inside tennis top 10
-
Italy's spread-out Olympics face transport challenge
-
Son of Norway crown princess stands trial for multiple rapes
-
Side hustle: Part-time refs take charge of Super Bowl
-
Paying for a selfie: Rome starts charging for Trevi Fountain
-
Faced with Trump, Pope Leo opts for indirect diplomacy
-
NFL chief expects Bad Bunny to unite Super Bowl audience
-
Australia's Hazlewood to miss start of T20 World Cup
-
Bill, Hillary Clinton to testify in US House Epstein probe
-
Cuba confirms 'communications' with US, but says no negotiations yet
-
From 'watch his ass' to White House talks for Trump and Petro
-
Trump says not 'ripping' down Kennedy Center -- much
-
Sunderland rout 'childish' Burnley
-
Musk merges xAI into SpaceX in bid to build space data centers
-
Former France striker Benzema switches Saudi clubs
-
Sunderland rout hapless Burnley
-
Costa Rican president-elect looks to Bukele for help against crime
-
Hosts Australia to open Rugby World Cup against Hong Kong
-
New York records 13 cold-related deaths since late January
-
In post-Maduro Venezuela, pro- and anti-government workers march for better pay
-
Romero slams 'disgraceful' Spurs squad depth
-
Trump says India, US strike trade deal
Australia ban offers test on social media harm
Australia's under-16 social media ban will make the nation a real-life laboratory on how best to tackle the technology's impact on young people, experts say.
Those in favour of the world-first December 10 ban point to a growing mass of studies that suggest too much time online takes a toll on teen wellbeing.
But opponents argue there is not enough hard proof to warrant the new legislation, which could do more harm than good.
Adolescent brains are still developing into the early 20s, said psychologist Amy Orben, who leads a digital mental health programme at the University of Cambridge.
A "huge amount" of observational research, often based on surveys, has tracked a correlation between teen tech use and worse mental health, she told AFP.
But it is hard to draw firm conclusions, because phones are so ingrained into daily life, and young people may turn to social media because they are already suffering.
"With technology, because it's changing so fast, the evidence base will always be uncertain," Orben said.
"What could change the dial are experimental studies or evaluations of natural experiments. So evaluating the Australia ban is hugely important because it actually gives us a window on what might be happening."
- No 'smoking gun' -
To try and shed light on the cause-and-effect relationship, Australian researchers are recruiting 13- to 16-year-olds for a "Connected Minds Study" to assess how the ban affects their wellbeing.
A World Health Organization survey last year found that 11 percent of adolescents struggled to control their use of social media.
Other research has shown a link between excessive social media use and poor sleep, body image, school performance and emotional distress, such as a 2019 study of US schoolchildren in JAMA Psychiatry that found those who spent over three hours a day on social media could be at heightened risk for mental health problems.
So some experts argue the right time to act is now.
"I actually don't think this is a science issue. This is a values issue," said Christian Heim, an Australian psychiatrist and clinical director of mental health.
"We're talking about things like cyberbullying, the risk of suicide, accessing sites on anorexia nervosa and self-harm," he told AFP.
Evidence of a risk is growing, Heim said -- pointing to a 2018 study by neuroscientist Christian Montag that linked addiction to the Chinese messaging app WeChat to shrinking grey matter volume in part of the brain.
"We can't wait for stronger evidence," Heim said.
Scott Griffiths of the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences said a "smoking gun research study" was unlikely to emerge soon to prove the harms of social media.
But the ban was worth trying, he said.
"I'm hopeful that the major social media companies seeing this full-throated legislative action come into play will finally be motivated to more meaningfully protect the health and wellbeing of young people."
- 'Too blunt' -
More than three-quarters of Australian adults agreed with the new legislation before it passed, a poll indicated.
However, an open letter signed by more than 140 academics, campaigners and other experts cautioned that a ban would be "too blunt an instrument".
"People were saying: 'Well, kids are getting more anxious. There must be a reason -- let's ban social media'," argued one signatory, Axel Bruns, a digital media professor at Queensland University of Technology.
Children may simply have more reasons to be anxious, under pressure from pandemic-interrupted schooling and troubled by wars in Gaza and Ukraine, he told AFP.
And a ban might push some teens to more extreme, fringe sites, while preventing other marginalised young people from finding community.
Noelle Martin, an activist focused on image-based online abuse and deepfakes, feared the Australian ban would do little to help, given the country's history on enforcement of existing laws.
"I don't believe it will stop, prevent or do much to meaningfully combat this issue," Martin said.
In any case, the political decision has been taken in Australia.
"Social media is doing social harm to our children," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said this year.
"There is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it."
F.Moura--PC