-
Stocks mostly rise tracking earnings, US-Iran hopes
-
Alarm at German airport after drone found near Ukrainian plane, mid-air incident
-
Pakistan team reaches base camp with body of renowned climber killed in avalanche
-
Salah arrives in Turkey for Trabzonspor talks
-
Ceuta warns of 'unsustainable' situation for child migrants after influx
-
Embattled FIFA chief Infantino holds emergency talks with directors
-
SpaceX rocket stage believed to have slammed into Moon
-
Russian barrage on Kyiv kills 17 as Ukraine fails to down single missile
-
India monsoon floods, landslides kill more than 100 since July: officials
-
'Lost': Migrants despair after Britain expels them back to France
-
South Korea pro baseball league cancels games over heatwave
-
Cathay Pacific's profit soars 71% despite Iran war driving up fuel costs
-
Taiwan probes 17 China-funded firms over high-tech talent poaching
-
Russian barrage on Ukraine kills 15, wounds dozens more
-
Trump warns Iran to open Hormuz or get 'hit very hard'
-
South Korea police raid Starbucks HQ over 'Tank Day' fiasco
-
Factories shed workers in Bangladesh garment sector
-
Tech back in fashion as Asian markets extend rebound
-
North Korea warns of 'military options' over Japan rearmament
-
Total eclipse gives scientists chance to probe Sun's mysteries
-
Tiny light, big dream: Harvesting power from soil in Japan
-
What to know about the total solar eclipse on August 12
-
Trump admin to review 'closed' AI models before release: reports
-
'Like the end of the world': the eclipse chasers flocking to Spain
-
De Minaur fights past Duckworth in all-Aussie Montreal battle
-
Taiwan begins military drills as China pressure grows
-
High bills, cheap panels drive a Philippine solar surge
-
UK mansion where 'listeners' spied on Nazi generals becomes museum
-
Russian barrage on Ukraine kills 2, wounds dozens more
-
Sabalenka tops Uchijima in WTA Toronto opener
-
RE Royalties Announces Third Investment in Solaris Energy's Portfolio and Letter of Intent for Expanded Royalty Partnership for a Further US$62.7 Million
-
Alcaraz withdraws from Cincinnati Masters with wrist injury
-
Kgatlana strikes as South Africa reach WAFCON quarter-finals
-
SpaceX revenue jumps 92% in first earnings report, but shares slide
-
Pakistan close on series-levelling win against West Indies
-
US eyes Hormuz deal 'today or tomorrow' as ship sinks in Red Sea
-
Paramount CEO says politics fueling Warner Bros. merger battle
-
SpaceX revenue jumps 92% in first earnings report
-
Trump's sale of access to Truth Social raises eyebrows
-
New commissioner Berg wants to take MLS to 'next level'
-
SpaceX rocket stage expected to slam into Moon
-
Colombian ex-guerrillas fear for future under hardline president
-
US hopeful Hormuz strait deal will be done 'today or tomorrow'
-
Tsitsipas comeback continues with Montreal first-round win
-
Michigan primary puts Democratic divide on the ballot
-
Swiatek fends off Bejlek to reach Toronto third round
-
South Africa captain Kolisi to make Test return in Argentina
-
Reusser romps to overall lead at Tour de France Femmes
-
Cuba's famed resilience comes at a growing mental cost
-
McDonald's reports slower US sales in 2nd quarter
UK court hears latest Prince Harry libel suit against newspaper
A libel lawsuit brought by Prince Harry against one of Britain's biggest newspaper groups had its first court date Thursday in the latest legal action taken by the US-based royal.
The Duke of Sussex is suing Associated Newspapers -- which publishes the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday and MailOnline -- over an article alleging he had sought to keep a request for British police protection under wraps.
The lawsuit relates to coverage in the Mail on Sunday and online of a separate court challenge he is pursuing against the UK government over his security arrangements when he is in Britain.
Harry, 37, and his wife Meghan Markle, 40, live in California after stepping down from royal duties in 2019, which caused them to lose their UK taxpayer-paid protection.
The prince's lawyer, Justin Rushbrooke, told the High Court in a written submission that the February article was "defamatory" because it suggested Harry had "lied" and "improperly and cynically" tried to manipulate public opinion over the issue.
Associated Newspapers' legal team is disputing that there was "any meaning defamatory" of him in its coverage.
In the legal claim against the government, the duke has appealed to the High Court for a review of the interior ministry's refusal to allow him to pay for police protection himself, arguing the decision means he cannot return home safely.
The government has dismissed the offer to pay for police protection as "irrelevant," writing to the court earlier this year that personal "security by the police is not available on a privately financed basis".
The cases come after the royal couple launched legal action in recent years against a number of publications, alleging invasion of privacy.
Markle won a long-running case against Associated Newspapers last year over the publication of a letter she wrote to her estranged father.
Judge Matthew Nicklin, who is hearing the new libel claim, will rule on a number of preliminary issues that he is considering following Thursday's hearing.
V.Fontes--PC