-
US Senate backs Trump on Iran war despite deadline lapse
-
Key urges 'world-class' bowler Robinson to make England recall count
-
From Black Death to Covid, ships have long hosted outbreaks
-
Furyk wants long-term US Ryder blueprint, maybe role for Tiger
-
McIlroy back on course on eve of PGA despite blister
-
Eulalio seizes control of drenched Giro d'Italia
-
New trial ordered for US lawyer convicted of murdering wife, son
-
Stocks rise ahead of US-China summit
-
US wholesale prices jump 6.0% year-on-year in April, highest since 2022
-
Nations drawing down oil stocks at record pace: IEA
-
Carrick on brink of permanent Man Utd job: reports
-
Strong US economy's resilience to shocks tested by Iran war
-
Italy cheers UK's Catherine on first foreign visit since cancer diagnosis
-
Keys says players will strike over Grand Slam pay if 'necessary'
-
Eurovision stage inspired by Viennese opera
-
Gunshots at Philippine Senate as lawmaker wanted by ICC holds out
-
Winning worth the wait for Young no matter the ball
-
The Chilean town living with the world's most polluting dump
-
Donald pleased to have Rahm back for Ryder three-peat bid
-
Stocks waver, oil steady ahead of US-China summit as Iran talks stall
-
War in Middle East: latest developments
-
No cadmium please: French want less toxin in their baguettes
-
Warsh set to take over a divided Fed facing Trump assaults
-
Shots heard at Philippine Senate as lawmaker wanted by ICC holds out
-
France locks down 1,700 on cruise ship after 90-year-old dies
-
After the hobbits, director Peter Jackson tackles 'Tintin'
-
Real Madrid win legal battle over Bernabeu concert noise
-
EU won't ban LGBTQ 'conversion therapy' but will push states to act
-
Revived Swiatek cruises past Pegula and into Italian Open semis
-
Shots heard at Philippine Senate as lawmaker wanted by ICC holds out: AFP
-
Vin Diesel drives 'Fast and Furious' tribute in Cannes
-
Heckler ejected from Eurovision after Israel song disruption
-
Australia's North savours 'tremendous honour' of England role
-
For hantavirus, experts aim to inform without igniting Covid panic
-
Japan rides box office boom into Cannes
-
Trump arrives in China for superpower summit with Xi
-
UK's Catherine on first official foreign trip since cancer diagnosis
-
British scientists among winners of top Spanish award
-
Mbappe can show 'commitment' to Real Madrid: Arbeloa
-
Chinese tech giant Alibaba posts profit drop amid AI drive
-
King Charles lays out Starmer's agenda as PM fights for survival
-
Japan suspend Eddie Jones for verbally abusing officials
-
England drop Crawley for 1st Test against New Zealand
-
Stocks rise ahead of US-China summit as Iran talks stall
-
One trip, one ticket: New EU rules aim to ease train travel
-
SoftBank profit quadruples to $32 bn on AI investments
-
Africa must drop 'victim mentality': mogul Tony Elumelu
-
'Ungovernable' Britain? Once-stable politics in freefall
-
China tech giant Tencent sees Q1 profit jump after AI bets
-
Nissan expects return to profit after huge loss
Climate impacts set to cut 2050 global GDP by nearly a fifth
Climate change caused by CO2 emissions already in the atmosphere will shrink global GDP in 2050 by about $38 trillion, or almost a fifth, no matter how aggressively humanity cuts carbon pollution, researchers said Wednesday.
But slashing greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible remains crucial to avoid even more devastating economic impacts after mid-century, they reported in the journal Nature.
Economic fallout from climate change, the study shows, could increase tens of trillions of dollars per year by 2100 if the planet were to warm significantly beyond two degrees Celsius above mid-19th century levels.
Earth's average surface temperature has already climbed 1.2C above that benchmark, enough to amplify heatwaves, droughts, flooding and tropical storms made more destructive by rising seas.
Annual investment needed to cap global warming below 2C -- the cornerstone goal of the 2015 Paris Agreement -- is a small fraction of the damages that would be avoided, the researchers found.
Staying under the 2C threshold "could limit average regional income loss to 20 percent compared to 60 percent" in a high-emissions scenario, lead author Max Kotz, an expert in complexity science at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), told AFP.
Economists disagree on how much should be spent to avoid climate damages. Some call for massive investment now, while others argue it would be more cost-effective to wait until societies are richer and technology more advanced.
- Poor countries hit hardest -
The new research sidesteps this debate, but its eye-watering estimate of economic impacts helps make the case for ambitious near-term action, the authors and other experts said.
"Our calculations are super relevant" to such cost-benefit analyses, said co-author Leonie Wenz, also a researcher at PIK.
They could also inform government strategies for adapting to climate impacts, risk assessments for business, and UN-led negotiations over compensation for developing nations that have barely contributed to global warming, she told AFP.
Mostly tropical nations -- many with economies already shrinking due to climate damages -- will be hit hardest, the study found.
"Countries least responsible for climate change are predicted to suffer income loss that is 60 percent greater than the higher-income countries and 40 percent greater than higher-emission countries," said senior PIK scientist Anders Levermann.
"They are also the ones with the least resources to adapt to its impacts."
Rich countries will not be spared either: Germany and the United States are forecast to see income shrivel by 11 percent by 2050, and France by 13 percent.
Projections are based on four decades of economic and climate data from 1,600 regions rather than country-level statistics, making it possible to include damages earlier studies ignored, such as extreme rainfall.
- A likely underestimate -
The researchers also looked at temperature fluctuations within each year rather than just averages, as well as the economic impact of extreme weather events beyond the year in which they occurred.
"By accounting for these additional climate variables, the damages are about 50 percent larger than if we were to only include changes in annual average temperatures," the basis of most prior estimates, said Wenz.
Wenz and her colleagues found that unavoidable damage would slash the global economy's GPD by 17 percent in 2050, compared to a scenario with no additional climate impacts after 2020.
Even so, the new calculations may be conservative.
"They are likely to be an underestimate of the costs of climate change impacts," Bob Ward, policy director of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment in London, commented to AFP ahead of the study's publication.
Damages linked to sea-level rise, stronger tropical cyclones, the destabilisation of ice sheets and the decline of major tropical forests are all excluded, he noted.
Climate economist Gernot Wagner, a professor at Columbia Business School in New York who was also not involved in the study, said the conclusion that "trillions in damages are all locked in doesn't mean that cutting carbon pollution doesn't pay."
In fact, he said, it shows that "the costs of acting are a fraction of the costs of unmitigated climate change".
Global GDP in 2022 was just over $100 trillion, according to the World Bank. The study projects that -- absent climate impacts after 2020 -- it would be double that in 2050.
E.Paulino--PC