-
Oil prices jump, stocks waver after Trump's Iran claim
-
'A top person': Who is the US dealing with in Iran?
-
In Lebanon's Tyre, ancient site threatened by Israeli bombs
-
US-Israeli war on Iran is 'breach of international law': German president
-
Mbappe says injury is behind him, all systems go for World Cup
-
Supporters' group file lawsuit against 'excessive' World Cup ticket prices
-
Gas shortages push India's poor back to wood and coal
-
'Plundered': Senegal fishers feel sting of illegal, industrial vessels
-
Iran hits Israel with missiles after denying Trump talks
-
Stocks rise on Trump U-turn but unease sees oil bounce
-
Trans community alarmed as India moves to curb LGBTQ rights
-
Families' nightmare fight for justice in Austria child sex cases
-
Tiger Woods to return to action in TGL with Masters looming
-
Australia, EU agree sweeping new trade pact eight years in the works
-
Back to black: facing energy shock, Asia turns to coal
-
Iran fires new wave of missiles at Israel after denying Trump talks
-
Manila's jeepney drivers struggle as Mideast war sends diesel cost soaring
-
The contenders vying to be next Danish leader
-
India's historic haveli homes caught between revival and ruin
-
Denmark votes in close election, outgoing PM tipped to win
-
N. Korea's Kim vows 'irreversible' nuclear status, warns Seoul of 'merciless' response
-
Pressure on Italy as play-off hopefuls eye 2026 World Cup
-
Malinin and Sakamoto seek solace at figure skating worlds as Olympic champions absent
-
'Perfect Japan' posts spark Gen Z social media backlash
-
Asian stocks rise on Trump U-turn but unease sees oil bounce
-
Pistons halt Lakers streak while Spurs, Thunder win
-
Silence not an option, says Canadian Sikh activist after fresh threats
-
Rennie shakes up All Blacks backroom team as 2027 World Cup looms
-
Australia, EU agree to sweeping new trade pact after eight years
-
Too old? The 92-year-old US judge handling Maduro case
-
Australia, EU agree sweeping new trade pact
-
Sinner, Sabalenka march on in Miami as more seeds crash out
-
US social media addiction trial jury struggles for consensus
-
EU 'concerned' by reports Hungary leaked information to Russia
-
USPA Global and ESPN Expand Relationship with Chris Fowler for 2026 High-Goal Polo Championships
-
IXOPAY and Zip US Introduce Unified Trust Layer Framework to Help Merchants Reduce Risk in Agentic Commerce
-
EU chief meets Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Israel pounds south Beirut, says captured Hezbollah members
-
EU chief to meet Australian PM as trade talks enter 'last mile'
-
Champion Mensik, Medvedev dumped out of Miami Open
-
Jury at US social media addiction trial reports 'difficulty' in finding consensus
-
Stokes eager to lead England recovery after 'hardest period of captaincy'
-
Venezuela protesters demand end to 'hunger' level wages
-
Eight people arrested in Brazil for 'brutal' attack on capybara
-
Audi Q9 – how likely is it to become a reality?
-
Oil slides, stocks rebound on Trump's Iran remarks
-
On Iran, Trump executes his most spectacular U-turn yet
-
Trump announces 'very good' Iran talks denied by Tehran
-
Bill Cosby ordered to pay $19m over sex abuse claim
-
Dodgers eye 'threepeat' as new MLB season welcomes robot umpires
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.
The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.
Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.
But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.
They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.
"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.
His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.
Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.
- Mass surveillance? -
Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.
"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."
Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.
Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.
Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.
"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.
"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."
- Germany holds key -
A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.
Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.
The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.
What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:
-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.
-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.
Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.
V.Fontes--PC